OK. Now I get it. Why use 50eV? Since lifetime and other broadening is not
taken into acocunt in any of these tables, why not use a very small number?
mam
On 9/24/2015 11:07 AM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
On 09/24/2015 01:43 PM, Matthew Marcus wrote:
See the attached ppt for the demo. I th
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Marcus wrote:
> OK, at least we've come to convergence about what 'edge jump' means in
> this context.
>
> Do you think the Elam value for (mu(+)-mu(-))_L3/(mu(+)-mu(-))_L2 is
> correct?
>
Well, I don't really know. "Around 2" seems somewh
On 09/24/2015 01:43 PM, Matthew Marcus wrote:
See the attached ppt for the demo. I think this gives the whole
repeat-by and interpretation. Am I just missing something? That would
not be totally surprising.
The algorithms in Hephaestus are pretty dim-witted and tuned (such as
they are) to g
OK, at least we've come to convergence about what 'edge jump' means in this
context.
Do you think the Elam value for (mu(+)-mu(-))_L3/(mu(+)-mu(-))_L2 is correct?
mam
On 9/24/2015 10:36 AM, Matt Newville wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Marcus mailto:mamar.
On 09/24/2015 12:47 PM, Matthew Marcus wrote:
What about that seeming inconsistency between the values H. gives for
the thickness needed for unit edge step and the cm^2/gm values reported?
That seems to be a bug indpependent of
the tables used.
I don't know what you're referring to, but I am
jana padeznik gomilsek
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:02:08 -0700
From: Matthew Marcusmailto:mamar...@lbl.gov>>
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffitmailto:ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>>
Subject: [Ifeffit] Problem with Hephaestus at Ca L-
.html#tab2).
I would doubt the Chantler's L3+.1 number, all other numbers look ok - this is
what you
can get.
jana padeznik gomilsek
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:02:08 -0700
From: Matthew Marcus
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Subject: [Ifeffit] Problem with Hephaestus at Ca L-e
3 Sep 2015 18:02:08 -0700
From: Matthew Marcus
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Subject: [Ifeffit] Problem with Hephaestus at Ca L-edges
Message-ID:<56034b90.70...@lbl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I wanted to work out the edge-jump ratio between the L3 and L2
I wanted to work out the edge-jump ratio between the L3 and L2 edges of Ca
using Hephaestus. I ran into two problems:
1. The ratio implied by what it says for the unit-edge-step thickness does
not agree with that derived by computing the absorption (cm^2/gm) above and
below each edge and
