coordination number N cannot be refined in this simple system
(12), is that right? In fact I just want to get the N through the fitting
of EXAFS because of the partial occupancy.
Thank you very much
Fuxiang Zhang
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit
e pure Ni but you may want to consider both fcc and bcc
> structure for making the model because the alloy may end up to be either
> that or that, especially if it is a nanoalloy.
>
> Anayoly
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Tablet
>
>
> ---- Origi
d a little difference
in the R and deltr. Which results should I believe, or something wrong I am
using the program because I cannot generate different R for Ni-Ni and Ni-Fe
pairs with the same data set.
Many thanks for your suggestions and helps.
Fuxiang Zhang
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Sc
Thank you all for the help.
Fuxiang
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Matt Newville
wrote:
> Fuxiang,
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Fuxiang Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi, Scott,
>>
>> In fact, I have a series of single crystal Ni-Fe alloys (Fm-3m) with
>>
value of Kmax;
3. How to make refinement equation for multi-scattering paths?
Such as in NiFe alloys (simple fcc structure), the path [Ni-FM-3m] Fe1.1
Ni1.4 Fe1.1., I use 0.67*Efe+0.33*Eni for DeltaE0, and
0.67*ssFe1+0.33*ssNi4 for sigma2, is that right?
Many thanks
Fuxiang Zhang
Thank you all for the answers.
The Kmax effect on the shape of magnitude of FTs of one of my samples may
come from the low signal/noise ratio.
I still not sure if there's any physical meaning of DeltaE0, Does it relate
to the shift of absorption edge?
Fuxiang
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Scott
Hi, All
I have a problem about E0. It seems that E0 has great effect on the R(x)
and the fitting. Can anyone explain how Athena automatically find the E0
value from an EXAFS spectrum.
Sometimes the value is not at the peak of derivative of u(E), shall it be
corrected manually?
Thanks
Fuxiang
selection of k range in Fourier transformation Parameters seems to
have some effect on the fitting results, how to select the range in
order to get reasonable results.
Many thanks
Fuxiang Zhang
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
) are within
> reason for what one
> would expect from sums of atomic radii.
>
> Hope this helps get you pointed in the right direction as you refine your
> model.
>
> cheers,
> Robert
>
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2017 10:57 AM, Fuxiang Zhang wrote:
>
> Dear All,
&
/003414.html
>
> Looking at your chi(k), it seems usable, charitably, up to about 8 A-1,
> not to 12 A-1 as your
> window suggests you have used. Claims of being able to resolve small
> splittings
> with this data will be viewed with skepticism.
>
> -R.
>
> On 4/18/20
10 matches
Mail list logo