Anupam Jain wrote:
Spread awareness? Start a free music based channel of our own? :)
Just wondering , Is it ok to buy cd`s and start a music based channel :)
nah i don`t think so
Btw any pointer on resource of free music.
-- Anupam
___
ilugd
On 7/12/07, Gaurav Mishra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering , Is it ok to buy cd`s and start a music based channel :)
nah i don`t think so
Btw any pointer on resource of free music.
Jamendo - http://www.jamendo.com/en/
Regards, Pratik
___
Btw any pointer on resource of free music.
Jamendo - http://www.jamendo.com/en/
search-engine at creativecommons.org
telefantastic stuff
:-)
niyam
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
Spread awareness? Start a free music based channel
of our own? :)
Not a bad idea though
regards
VK
Engineers normally have problem with every solution. If not they have a
solution in search of a problem.
Disclaimer
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
On 7/12/07, vivek khurana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spread awareness? Start a free music based channel
of our own? :)
Not a bad idea though
gotcha! here's the exasperating thing:
even *if* i publish my music under a copyleft and/or free license, or
just give it away royalty-free,
the
apple has probably done 'a hostile takeover' of the CUPS project, by
'buying' the author.
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1249882244;fp;16;fpid;1
the community thinks this is to safeguard apple from issues with gpl3,
as apple's printing-engine relies on CUPS. maybe, maybe not.
IANAL FWIW
On Thursday 12 July 2007 11:28 pm, Linux Lingam wrote:
can we expect several more of such similar 'hostile' take-overs of
GPL-ed software where a lead-programmer essentially has the right to
revoke the GPL license for whatever motivations?
It's not possible for anyone to
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 23:28 +0530, Linux Lingam wrote:
apple has probably done 'a hostile takeover' of the CUPS project, by
'buying' the author.
[...]
could this have an impact on our GPL-ed ability to 'print-to-pdf' using CUPS?
[...]
Bah. Repeat four words after me, boys and girls:
F O R K
On 7/12/07, Linux Lingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apple has probably done 'a hostile takeover' of the CUPS project, by
'buying' the author.
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1249882244;fp;16;fpid;1
the community thinks this is to safeguard apple from issues with gpl3,
as apple's
apple has probably done 'a hostile takeover' of the CUPS project, by
'buying' the author.
...
the community thinks this is to safeguard apple from issues with gpl3,
as apple's printing-engine relies on CUPS. maybe, maybe not.
http://www.cups.org/documentation.php/license.html
--
hi! all,
A firefox event is taking place in Mumbai on 21st
July 2007. More details on
http://www.mehtanirav.com/2007/06/29/join-hands-with-firefox/
regards
VK
Engineers normally have problem with every solution. If not they have a
solution in search of a problem.
Disclaimer
The facts
gotcha! here's the exasperating thing:
even *if* i publish my music under a copyleft and/or
free license, or
just give it away royalty-free,
the RIAA *will* collect royalties for *all* music
broadcast or shared
on the web.
so as an artist you could just give up and collect
your money
On Thursday 12 July 2007 23:02, Linux Lingam wrote:
[snip]
gotcha! here's the exasperating thing:
even *if* i publish my music under a copyleft and/or free license, or
just give it away royalty-free,
the RIAA *will* collect royalties for *all* music broadcast or shared
on the web.
so as an
On 13-Jul-07, at 9:41 AM, Raj Mathur wrote:
GPL-ed software where a lead-programmer essentially has the right to
revoke the GPL license for whatever motivations?
Note that there's a difference between ``lead programmer'' and ``only
programmer''. If Foo is the only programmer of a project,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 July 2007 23:28, Linux Lingam wrote:
[snip]
can we expect several more of such similar 'hostile' take-overs of
GPL-ed software where a lead-programmer essentially has the right to
revoke the GPL license for whatever motivations?
change the license. Alternatively, she can go back to the pristine
source which she originally single-handedly created and re-license
that, but she loses all the innovation that the community made, and the
community product remains under GPL anyway.
Won't it be complex? Once a part of the
--- Linux Lingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apple has probably done 'a hostile takeover' of the
CUPS project, by
'buying' the author.
apple also bought the GPL-ed software similarly,
that was the
precursor to 'shake' its video-compositing app.
can we expect several more of such similar
17 matches
Mail list logo
