Fredrik Lundh a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Klein Stéphane wrote:
Resume :
1. first question : why PIL package in "pypi" don't work ?
Because Fred Lundh have his package distributions unfortunate names that
setuptools doesn't like...
It used to support this
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Etienne Desautels wrote:
> Do you know when you will release the final version ? It looks like your not
> really far from releasing.
The release should have been cut ages ago, but last-second bug reports
pushed it into my vacation. And when you don't make a prop
Sorry for posting in to parts.
On 09-09-28, at 07:22, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Etienne Desautels
wrote:
3. Converting from TIFF CMYK to RGB shift the colors dramatically.
This is a bug in 1.1.6 and earlier (well, strictly speaking, it's a
old bug in Photoshop
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Etienne Desautels wrote:
>>> 3. Converting from TIFF CMYK to RGB shift the colors dramatically.
>>
>> This is a bug in 1.1.6 and earlier (well, strictly speaking, it's a
>> old bug in Photoshop, but I guess we're not really in a position to
>> make them change the
On 09-09-28, at 07:22, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Etienne Desautels
wrote:
So after experimenting, I see 3 problems:
1. Resize with ANTIALIAS from a large JPEG to a small thumbnail
give poor
image quality.
This should work fine in 1.1.6; no time to look at yo
Ah, sneaky. I'm pretty sure the current binary distribution was built
when 2.6 was new, and I didn't really expect them to tweak
build-related issues in an incremental release :)
I'll push out a new build asap; will ping the list when it's available.
Thanks!
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, K
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Klein Stéphane wrote:
>>
>> Resume :
>> 1. first question : why PIL package in "pypi" don't work ?
>
> Because Fred Lundh have his package distributions unfortunate names that
> setuptools doesn't like...
It used to support this, but no long
The fix was applied to the main Python distribution (2.6.2 has it for
sure, 2.6.0/2.6.1 does not). Any extension built with 2.6.2 or higher
should be fine, as it will not get an embedded manifest.
So just rebuild with Python Windows version 2.6.2. I see in the PIL
source tree that it uses a setu
Fredrik Lundh writes:
>Did you solve this? The problem can be that the resulting module is
>squirreled away somewhere where the test cannot find it. What happens
>if you just fire up a Python interpreter and type:
>
>import _imaging
>_imaging.__file__
>
>If the former gives an ImportErro
It tries to tell you that PIL's _imaging.so module was built without
JPEG support, which means that the setup.py script couldn't find or
set up the libjpeg library.
If setup claims that it did find libjpeg, make sure you don't have
multiple _imaging.so modules around (the selftest in 1.1.6 can
som
Might be that Python's picking up some other module named "Image".
Make sure that Image.__file__ (the location of the source for the
image) is what you expect it to be in your different environments.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Herb Verbesey
wrote:
> The following codes works fine when run
Make sense, but I'm not sure I can figure out what they actually ended
up doing about it from that thread. Anyone who can summarize and/or
provide a patch?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Farshid Lashkari wrote:
> Hello,
> I've encountered an issue with distributing a Python 2.6 and PIL based
The quality setting is used to create a quantization table which is
then used by the compression algorithm. There's no pre-defined
mapping between quality and the contents of the quantization table for
JPEG (different implementations do different things), but some
applications attempt to guess by
From: qiaohl
Is there any function in PIL to get the value of JPEG quality(1-100)? I
know there are functions to set this value, But I found no function to get
this value of an existing JPEG file.
You can't get the quality value, because it's not stored anywhere in the
file.
I found a Micro
Hi,all
Is there any function in PIL to get the value of JPEG quality(1-100)? I know
there are functions to set this value, But I found no function to get this
value of an existing JPEG file.
Thanks!
2009-09-28
qiaohl
___
Image-SIG maillist
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Etienne Desautels wrote:
> So after experimenting, I see 3 problems:
> 1. Resize with ANTIALIAS from a large JPEG to a small thumbnail give poor
> image quality.
This should work fine in 1.1.6; no time to look at your tests right
now, but I'll do that asap.
> 2.
16 matches
Mail list logo