Matthias Baas wrote:
Christopher Barker wrote:
Ha! I haven't had a look at selftest.py before. That script requires an
inplace build which I didn't do. Instead, I was pointing PYTHONPATH
inside the build directory
yup -- that will confuse things.
But when I link
against the static lib, the te
Christopher Barker wrote:
>> *** PIL CORE support not installed
>
> That sure doesn't look good!
>
>> *** TKINTER support not installed
>> --- JPEG support ok
>> --- ZLIB (PNG/ZIP) support ok
>> *** FREETYPE2 support not installed
>> *** LITTLECMS support not installed
>
> neither do those.
Ha!
Chris,
Thanks so much for the suggestion!
I ran the otool command and noted that the _imaging.so is linked to the
wrong (newer) libjpeg:
simon@/Users/simon/: otool -L PIL/_imaging.so
PIL/_imaging.so:
/opt/local/lib/libjpeg.8.dylib (compatibility version 9.0.0, current
version 9.1.0)
Christopher Barker wrote:
> great -- are any of them running 10.4?
>
> I have little time, but here is the short version:
>
> The goal is to get a PIL binary that is statically linked to all of its
> dependencies, and those dependencies are all universal (32 bit PPC and
> Intel) and linked agains
Hi!
I will not reply to any further messages you send me off the list!
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 21:40 +0300, Валери Милев wrote:
> with .convert("L") and array=asarray(i) works! Thaks for the Tip!!
> That is very strange because the values are the same like im my
> method. The only difreance I not
Matthias Baas wrote:
Christopher Barker wrote:
great -- are any of them running 10.4?
I have little time, but here is the short version:
The goal is to get a PIL binary that is statically linked to all of its
dependencies, and those dependencies are all universal (32 bit PPC and
Intel) and lin
Simon Mosk-Aoyama wrote:
I've seemingly re-built libjpeg correctly from source and
have re-built PIL to point at this newly built libjpeg, but it's still
failing.
It sure looks like you've done the right thing...
Does anyone else have any idea how to solve this?
NO, but something that m
Hi!
Please don't post off the list.
I am under the impression that you are preparing the array in the wrong
way: not only you need to have a 480x640 matrix for 640x480 image, but
it also have to be transposed correctly.
Also, if you need luminance only why wouldn't you just use the grayscale
mo
Hi Валери!
Check this thread out for the explanation and my later postings for the
cut and paste solution:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/image-sig/2010-April/006213.html
--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev
___
Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@pyt
