RE: [IMail Forum] Way OT: Imaging software

2006-06-22 Thread maillists
John, We use snapshot.exe from http://www.drivesnapshot.com. No bells and whistles, butsimple, reliable and flexible. Reasonably priced, as well.Single EXE, no install needed,GUI or commandline operated, can create differential disk images. Cost isapprox. US$120 per server, which is 10%from

Re: [IMail Forum] Way OT: Imaging software

2006-06-22 Thread John Yodonise
I will be out of the office Thursday, June 22nd and Friday, June 23rd. I will not have access to email or voice mails during that time until late in the evening. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Brian Goff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or David Ellis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Yodonise

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] help with filter

2006-06-22 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Because most of the time it shows up sending spam. No, it is spoofed *because* it is a valid client. If you want more information on this topic, search SA-Users. Find another way to block this mail. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Way OT: Imaging software

2006-06-22 Thread Matti Haack
I just tested Driveimage XML, which is free and able to image most NT XP Pro / 2003 partiton types... DriveImage XML is an easy to use and reliable program for imaging and backing up partitions and logical drives. The program allows you to: Backup logical drives and partitions to image

Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Way OT: Imaging software

2006-06-22 Thread John Yodonise
I will be out of the office Thursday, June 22nd and Friday, June 23rd. I will not have access to email or voice mails during that time until late in the evening. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Brian Goff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or David Ellis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Yodonise

[IMail Forum] MessageSniffer

2006-06-22 Thread Martin Schaible
Hi, After a night running MessageSniffer, it looks quite different. MessageSniffer is really able to catch those silly image-only ad's. It also trapped other mails, which are not blacklisted or covered by invURIBL. btw, the trial version behaves like the regular one. The signature database is

RE: [IMail Forum] ASSP

2006-06-22 Thread Marc Funaro
(sent again, as it never seems to show up on the list...) After using the test database for months with good success, we purchased a messageSniffer one-year license, and then ended up switching to a BSD-based mail system, totally away from Windows/iMail. During our time on Windows/iMail,

FW: [IMail Forum] Way OT: Imaging software

2006-06-22 Thread Greg Shepherd
Brian or David - If you have access to Email Server as Administrator. I can help set up a rule for John's Account to block Vacation Messages to Imail Forum. Greg Shepherd Catalyst Manufacturing Services, Inc Test Engineering IT Administrator 2507 Wayne Street Endicott, New York 13760

[IMail Forum] automated response

2006-06-22 Thread Jason C. Fullen
I will be out of the office June 21, 22, and 23. If you need immediate assistance, please call Buddy or Yolanda at 800-826-2010 or email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Jason To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive:

[IMail Forum] mail dated 12-31-1969

2006-06-22 Thread Gil Gomes
I couldn't find a thread about this, nor anything in the archives. If I missed it, please be kind. I'm getting some email that's dated 12/31/1969, for whatever reason. I just noticed today that I'm getting an automated response from a tape backup system at home that shows the correct date in

[IMail Forum] troubles delivering to Bellsouth.net

2006-06-22 Thread Tyler Jensen
Anyone else having problems delivering to bellsouth.net? The server has tried both MXs 205.152.58.32 and .33 and keep getting 421 Service not availableSMTP_DELIV_FAILED I wonder if we are being blocked. Thanks! Tyler

[IMail Forum] (John Yodonise) Brian or David -

2006-06-22 Thread Joel Lichtenberger
Greg, Just curious, have you heard from Brian or David? Joel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:41 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: IMail Forum (E-mail) Subject: FW: [IMail

RE: [IMail Forum] troubles delivering to Bellsouth.net

2006-06-22 Thread Adam Campbell
We've sent a few this morning without incident. adamc From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyler Jensen Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 08:49 To: Ipswitch IMail Mailing List Subject: [IMail Forum] troubles delivering to Bellsouth.net

[IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread Grant Griffith - IMail
Hello All, We are currently using a Barracuda Spam Firewall 400 and are having more and more junk mails somehow ignoring that our MX points to that firewall and then they send directly to our Imail server along with a Exchange server we are running. Has anyone found a way to stop this? We

Re: [IMail Forum] troubles delivering to Bellsouth.net

2006-06-22 Thread Tyler Jensen
Thanks Adam. I was told by a bellsouth to email their postmaster account with a desciption of the issue. Does anyone know anyone at bellsouth or an easier way in to tech support that will actually get me somewhere? Thanks! Tyler - Original Message - From: Adam Campbell [EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread Grant Bainbridge
Grant, We have a Barracuda 300, and we handle this by passing off all email through the cuda before it reaches the users' mailboxes. We have 3 email servers, with only one hosting email accounts, and all three are at least dual homed. 1 interface on each goes to the WAN, and another connects to

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05??

2006-06-22 Thread Kevin Gillis
hi chris, we are in final testing now and released to the Preview Users today. general availability is still being set. we have focused on quality and improving the installation/iis/active dir configuration. here's a short list of what's included in 2006.1? 1) several updates to the web

RE: [IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread John T \(Lists\)
In this day and age, that is a bullet that must be bit. (Forcing port 587) John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith - IMail Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:47 AM

RE: [IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread Dan Horne
Agreed, it is the same as having to force SMTP AUTH a few years back. It was a PITA for a few weeks, but has saved us so many headaches since. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:19 AM

RE: [IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread Matt W
Interesting situation. If all the junk mail is flowing straight to your iMail server externally you could just block outside access in to the mailserver @ port 25. This leaves the only true path _through_ your Barracuda device. The internal users stay unchanged, accessing the local mailserver

[IMail Forum] date stamp December 1969

2006-06-22 Thread Gil Gomes
I couldn't find a thread about this, nor anything in the archives. If I missed it, please be kind. I'm getting some email that's dated 12/31/1969, for whatever reason. I just noticed today that I'm getting an automated response from a tape backup system at home that shows the correct date in

Re: [IMail Forum] date stamp December 1969

2006-06-22 Thread Matrosity Hosting
yes, I've seen that. They were all spam when I saw them though. Gil Gomes wrote: I couldn't find a thread about this, nor anything in the archives. If I missed it, please be kind. I'm getting some email that's dated 12/31/1969, for whatever reason. I just noticed today that I'm getting an

RE: [IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread Rick Rodery
Hello Everyone. I had been using a proxy anti-spam server installed on the same machine as my ipswitch 2006 server for a few months, with terrific results, all incoming mail came into the anti-spam server on port 25, and was passed to the ipswitch on port 25025, worked great until a month ago

[IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Robert
Dear list, please make sure that the rules stated in an earlier thread are followed. Not only emphasize turning off return reciepts but not to never have automated responses of any kind! IMHO we've seen enough of the 'Out of office replies'. regards // Robert To Unsubscribe:

RE: [IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread Len Conrad
We have a Barracuda 300, and we handle this by passing off all email through the cuda before it reaches the users' mailboxes. We have 3 email servers, with only one hosting email accounts, and all three are at least dual homed. 1 interface on each goes to the WAN, and another connects to a

Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Michael Hoyt
As has been said before-the reason you are seeing these automated responses is because the list server is not adding the Precedence: list or Precedence: bulk header. The problem is not with misconfigured auto responders or vacation messages. Yes, we have all seen enough of these, but the Fix

RE: [IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread Grant Bainbridge
One small detail I left out - we don't run Imail on our 2 backup servers, so with this method Imail is not visible to the outside world. Traffic directed to our Imail server on Port 25 gets redirected to the Barracuda. Every single inbound email gets processed by the barracuda prior to delivery

RE: [IMail Forum] Junk Mail Bypassing Filtering

2006-06-22 Thread Len Conrad
Traffic directed to our Imail server on Port 25 gets redirected to the Barracuda. Every bit of it is illegit (internet direct to IP, bypassing MX), and often exceeds the volume of legit mail, so running it through Imail is very inefficient. Len To Unsubscribe:

Re: [IMail Forum] ASSP

2006-06-22 Thread Matt Robertson
On 6/21/06, Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SorryI meant Mark :) No its 'Matt' :-) I understand Bayesian filtering won't work for everybody. perhaps I am lucky, with a fairly diverse if not particularly large bunch of users (about 250) spanning a variety of commercial and

RE: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Tripp Allen
The precedence: bulk will be back when we load the next preview version of 2006.1 on the list server. There is a rule blocking read receipt requests. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hoyt Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:03

Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Tripp, When do you estimate that will be done? It would help immensely. While any single OOF message doesn't take much to delete, they certainly add up to a lot of wasted time. Darin. - Original Message - From: Tripp Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent:

RE: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Tripp Allen
Hopefully we can get it loaded next week. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:05 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list Hi Tripp, When do you

Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05??

2006-06-22 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi Kevin, Next week I'm going to set up our test server. Can I then download the 2006.1 versien even if it is beta/gamma? I'd like to approach the version I'll be installing end of Juli on the production server as best as I can. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From:

Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Rod Dorman
On Thursday, June 22, 2006, 12:52:16, Tripp Allen wrote: The precedence: bulk will be back when we load the next preview version of 2006.1 on the list server. Just curious, why not Precedence: list? IMHO its more descriptive of the contents. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already

[IMail Forum] IMail/ICS 2006.1

2006-06-22 Thread Kevin Gillis
hello bonno, yes, of course. please contact Jason Benton (see cc) and he can get you the information for accessing. bye for now, kg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:38 PM To:

[IMail Forum] Automated Double Opt-in for the list server.

2006-06-22 Thread Chuck Schick
I want to set a double optin system for Imail list server. Declude's confirm seems to no longer be operating. Can anyone recomend a script that would do this in conjunction with a program alias. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com To Unsubscribe:

[IMail Forum] automated response

2006-06-22 Thread McMahon, Sean
Hi, I am out office from Friday 6/23 to Monday 6/26, returning to the office on Tuesday 6/27. If you have an urgent system issue, please contact the OIIT Helpdesk at 635-9200. Thanks, Sean To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive:

RE: [IMail Forum] Automated Double Opt-in for the list server.

2006-06-22 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What version of Declude are you using? I have tested the latest version and they are working. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006

RE: [IMail Forum] Automated Double Opt-in for the list server.

2006-06-22 Thread Chuck Schick
The reason I say they are not operating is because you can no longer download the confirm.cfg file from the declude site. It is just a busted link. Declude won't acknowledge one way or another. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [IMail Forum] date stamp December 1969

2006-06-22 Thread Gil Gomes
It's a known issue. I wound up calling Ipswitch about it. They're working on a fix and hope to have it included in the 2006.1 release... -Gil yes, I've seen that. They were all spam when I saw them though.Gil Gomes wrote: I couldn't find a thread about this, nor anything in the archives. If I