On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:46 AM, soren opensola...@spam.monkeydyne.com wrote:
The bad news is that performance and stability seem to be an issue. On my old
Intel board (a DP35DP) I could reliably 'dd if=/dev/zero of=foo.bin' and get
between 45-60Mb/s on a raid-z 3+1 ZFS pool. With this board
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Nilsen, Vidar vidar.nil...@palantir.no wrote:
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
I've checked the webpage for transmission-client mentioned by others.
Maybe I can use that instead.
My opensolaris-box is a headless box with lots of disks. I use it
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Gilles Graviergilles.grav...@sun.com wrote:
One thing I tried in CrossOver (not on Solaris, but on Ubuntu - the
DirectX support isn't there on Solaris yet) was to run World of
Warcraft... and when you enter the city of Ironforge, it's very obvious
that World of
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, David Abrahamsd...@boostpro.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of links I want to aggregate with a static IP address.
Should be simple, right? Well, just getting a static IP address set up
turns out to be challenging at best. I've done a lot of googling, and
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:56 PM, David Abrahamsd...@boostpro.com wrote:
Here's what it contains:
# cat /etc/resolv.conf
domain luannocracy.com
# nameserver 192.168.188.1
nameserver 207.172.3.8
nameserver 207.172.3.9
nameserver 207.172.3.10
nameserver 207.172.3.11
Interestingly, I can
Hi,
I'm using Ubuntu for my netbook, connected at work using IEEE 802.1x
wireless and at home using USB modem, both works correctly.
I can't find support for either connection type on opensolaris 2009.06
CD. Are they supported? What packages would I need to install?
--
Fajar
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:07 PM, dick hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
How reliable is the beadm rename command. I ask because I once
screwed up a BE on nevada doing a rename using LU.
Can I safely rename a BE?
Isn't beadm rename today simply a zfs rename and edit to grub.conf?
--
Fajar
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:29 PM, dick hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net wrote:
Isn't beadm rename today simply a zfs rename and edit to
grub.conf?
Dont know. I want my BE to be OK afterwards. That's all ;-)
It's reliable, last time I check, both beadm way
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Evan Layton evan.lay...@sun.com wrote:
That doesn't mean you can't fake one up outside of beadm as suggested below
however that's not a supported method for creating BE's. Plus the ability to
do this will probably be impacted going forwad as more BE validation
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:02 PM, solarg sol...@laposte.net wrote:
$ pfexec pkg image-update
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed 732/732 45152/45152 1254.94/1254.94
how do you explain that 3.8G isn't sufficient?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:06 AM, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
The OpenSolaris development package repository
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_111a for both x86/x64
and SPARC platforms.
Turns out this build fix vlan issue, so that it works
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
It is not available yet; build 111 is currently the focus in anticipation of
2009.06.
Is there a list (or at least a draft) of what post-111 bugfix will be
included in the respin or final 2009.06?
Bug 6806627 which
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Ross myxi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Apologies if this is the wrong forum, but does anybody know which build the
final release is likely to be? I've been monitoring quite a few features /
bugfixes and there are a ton of really useful ones coming out
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Gaylard a...@computer.org wrote:
I have an Ultra-60 (2x400MHz CPUs, 2 GiB RAM, elite-3D graphics)
and I'm keen to install OpenSolaris. There are three wrinkles:
- the box only has a CDROM, not a DVDROM
- my OBP is 3.31. That means that AI images won't
Some time ago I tested vlan in snv_109, which does not work, and was
pointed to bug 6810953, which should be fixed in snv_111. And it did
(vlan works in dom0). But I think I have a new bug. Here's my network
setup
# dladm show-link
LINKCLASSMTUSTATEOVER
eth1phys
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:14 AM, W. Wayne Liauh w...@hawaiilinux.us wrote:
This is what I meant (abstractly speaking): zpool send 109@ = beadm destroy
109 = pfexec pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.108 = (optionally)
zpool recv 109@
You mean something similar to debootstrap or yum
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Knut Anders Hatlen knut.hat...@sun.com wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net writes:
I got this in snv_110:
# svcs -xv
svc:/system/hal:default (Hardware Abstraction Layer daemon)
State: maintenance since Mon Mar 30 13:23:22 2009
Reason: Start method
I'm trying to setup solaris 10 install server on opensolaris, snv_109,
from DVD iso, and I noticed that lofi trhoughput is terribly slow
from iostat:
device r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv svc_t %w %b
lofi1 18.30.0 146.70.0 0.0 1.0 54.4 0 100
ramdisk10.00.0
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Andrew Gabriel
agabr...@opensolaris.org wrote:
100% busy on 147 kbps read? Seriously?
The ISO file is located on zfs pool on sd2
Is this expected, or is it something wrong with my setup?
I suspect it's bugid 6806627
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Andrew Gabriel
agabr...@opensolaris.org wrote:
100% busy on 147 kbps read? Seriously?
The ISO file is located on zfs pool on sd2
Is this expected, or is it something wrong with my setup
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Andrew Gabriel
agabr...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
After reading the bug report more thoroughly, it seems that the bug
triggered when there's mismatch in block size and request size. So I
tried setting recordsize=512, and copy the iso again
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Liam Merwick liam.merw...@sun.com wrote:
fatal error: No such file or directory: Unable to
open VLDC instance
/devices/virtual-devi...@100/channel-devi...@200/virtu
al-chan...@0:hvctl
for contacting hypervisor
[ Mar 23 14:23:58 Method start exited with status
Hi,
What is the status of LDOM on opensolaris? Is it supposed to work?
I'm trying to test LDOM on opensolaris snv_109, T2000, following the links
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/ldoms/
http://docs.sun.com/source/820-4913-10/index.html
http://docs.sun.com/source/820-4913-10/chapter3.html
but
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Stephen Hahn s...@sun.com wrote:
You're all welcome to make content mirrors according to
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/pkg/Mirroring/
Using mirroring will make all the content requests local, which is the
bulk of the traffic by far. We're working on
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Stephen Hahn s...@sun.com wrote:
You're all welcome to make content mirrors according to
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/pkg/Mirroring/
Upon reading the docs, I see The rsync server on pkg.opensolaris.org
is currently configured to allow four simultanous
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Will setting up a proxy with squid does essentially the same thing? Or
does pkg (or pkg.opensolaris.org) does something that prevents proxy
from working?
The way the packaging client currently operates will prevent
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net wrote:
I just finished setting up a T2000 using automated installer. Is there
a rescue network boot for opensolaris/sparc?
For solaris/sparc I can do boot net -s.
For those of you looking for a similar thing, boot net:dhcp -s
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:14 AM, W. Wayne Liauh w...@hawaiilinux.us wrote:
I now have a working
opensolaris
installation which I want to clone to another sparc
machine on the
same network, currently running Solaris 10.
I can't see why you can't send/ssh/gzip a snapshot from your base
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:51 AM, W. Wayne Liauh w...@hawaiilinux.us wrote:
Is there an
installgrub-equivalent in sparc
Sorry I misunderstood your question. I thought you already have an
installation in an rpool.
No :)
I could try moving/upgrading the existing sol10 to zfs root though. Or
Hi,
First of all thanks to all who've helped me get past the issues in
installing opensolaris on sparc. I now have a working opensolaris
installation which I want to clone to another sparc machine on the
same network, currently running Solaris 10. I have sc access, but no
physical access (i.e.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Sundar Yamunachari
sundar.yamunach...@sun.com wrote:
What is the build of the install server? This problem looks similar to bug
3966
snv_109
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Sundar Yamunachari
sundar.yamunach...@sun.com wrote:
What is the build of the install server? This problem looks similar to bug
3966
snv_109
After importing the xml manually (as per
I just finished setting up a T2000 using automated installer. Is there
a rescue network boot for opensolaris/sparc?
For solaris/sparc I can do boot net -s.
Regards,
Fajar
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
I got this error
# bootadm update-archive
updating //platform/sun4v/boot_archive
bootadm: boot-archive creation FAILED, command: '/usr/bin/mkisofs
-quiet -graft-points -dlrDJN -relaxed-filenames -G
//platform/sun4v/lib/fs/hsfs/bootblk -o
//platform/sun4v/archive-new-549 -path-list 21'
the
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Enrico Perla enrico.pe...@sun.com wrote:
One possible workaround (if necessary) is to copy the
/boot/solaris/filestat.ramdisk from another be. bootadm will work fine after
that (for extra safety, run 'bootadm update-archive -f' afterwards) or mount
the
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Enrico Perla enrico.pe...@sun.com wrote:
One more question. In x86 I can use bootadm set-menu and also grub
menu during booting to select which BE to boot. How to choose which BE
to boot in sparc?
On sparc you can use boot -L to get a list of the available
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:31 AM, mary ding mary.d...@sun.com wrote:
Fajar:
The missing /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst is a known issue and it is tracked
under bugzilla 6744. I will update the bugid with your finding.
Thanks!
___
indiana-discuss mailing
2009/3/20 Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:31 AM, mary ding mary.d...@sun.com wrote:
Fajar:
The missing /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst is a known issue and it is tracked
under bugzilla 6744. I will update the bugid with your finding.
Thanks!
I think there may
(changing subject to match the problem)
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:36 AM, mary ding mary.d...@sun.com wrote:
Fajar:
For sparc, the menu should be /rpool/boot/menu.lst
For x86, the menu should be /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst
Can you move /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst to /rpool/boot/menu.lst and
I'm trying to install opensolaris on a T2000 using an existing x86
opensolaris as install server. Following
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/AI_install_server_setup.html
and the latest iso from genunix, I got as far as this :
# installadm create-service -n
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:13 PM, James Cornell spar...@gmail.com wrote:
przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
I don't understand this approach - the slowest PC-like tower/desktop box
can also have OpenSolaris installed on it but will be much, much faster then
the old Sun workstations.
It has to do
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Dave Miner dmi...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
# installadm create-service -n sparc_install_service -i
192.168.129.145 -c 2 -s /data/iso/osol-0906-109-ai-sparc.iso
/data/AI/sparc/snv_109
Setting up the target image at /data/AI/sparc/snv_109
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Masafumi Ohta masafumi.o...@gmail.com wrote:
but zpool status said the error (see attached files)
That zpool status shows that your pool experience checksum errors. It
MIGHT be that your SD card is bad, or your system is incompatible to
use SD as boot device.
My
2009/3/8 Robs r...@sun.com:
There's a CR against NWAM hosing stuff up.
After you login, try doing this:
svcadm clear nwam
If it is the CR I'm thinking about, graphics will start.
Bulls eye! You're absolutely right.
I knew nwam has some problems (which is why I use the old networking
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Niveditha Rau niveditha@sun.com wrote:
In builds 107 and 108, accelerated 3D will not work on any of the intel
graphics chipsets. We upgraded to Xorg 1.5.3 and intel_drv 2.4.2 in build
107 and needed to get drm updated to 1.5 to work with it, which only
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Masafumi Ohta masafumi.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2009/03/07, at 13:07, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
I tried snv_108
(http://genunix.org/distributions/indiana/osol-0906-108-x86.usb) on
Acer Aspire One (which has similar hardware)
Normal boot does not get into GUI
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Masafumi Ohta masafumi.o...@gmail.com wrote:
i915 driver for 945GME is supported OpenSolaris 2009.6 snv106a later
Is it?
I tried snv_108
(http://genunix.org/distributions/indiana/osol-0906-108-x86.usb) on
Acer Aspire One (which has similar hardware)
00:02.0 VGA
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Lurie y...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
Now if it worked for you, then I assume you upgraded to b106 ? If so, then
this has nothing to do with the wifi replacement, as I didn't change anything
and it happens to me as well. Something happens with nwam at the boot which
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net wrote:
yet svcs -a | grep -i scsi shows nothing.
... and running pkg fix gives this error (last lines only)
Verifying: pkg:/SUNWrmodr ERROR
file: boot/solaris/bootenv.rc
Hi,
I'm using 2008.11, then updated to snv_106.
When I try to share a zvol via iscsi, I get this error
iscsitgt service need to be enabled by a privileged user
I have these iscsi-related packages installed
system SUNWiscsidmrSun iSCSI Data Mover (Root)
system
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Karl Hakimian gtuag4...@sneakemail.com wrote:
Have you tried booting with -B disable-qlc=true?
Yes, I did :D
Without disable-qlc=true, the machine appears to hang on both normal
and xvm kernel.
With disable-qlc, normal kernel works fine, but xvm kernel doesn't
David Edmondson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:08:51AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On a side note, I've been using a vlan interface (bnx128001) which
works fine on both snv_98 dan os 2008.11 snv_101. It doesn't work on
snv_105.
105 includes Crossbow, which changed the way
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Karl Hakimian gtuag4...@sneakemail.com wrote:
I'm using xvm on snv_105 without problems. Have you tried booting with any
debug flags to find out where it is hanging?
Hi Karl, is there a how-to / documentation about the debug flags?
I'm mostly a Linux user, new
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Karl Hakimian
gtuag4...@sneakemail.com wrote:
A -k on your kernel line will run the debugger if you crash. I'm not sure how
to get into the debugger if it does not crash. Adding a -v to the kernel line
will show you what it is doing while you are booting.
Hi,
I updated my installation to snv_105 from pkg.opensolaris.org/dev.
Booting xvm kernel doesn't work. The last working xvm version that I
tested was on snv_98. I filed a bug report earlier on
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5905
Is anyone using xmv on opensolaris 2008.11
Dave Miner wrote:
(2) Is this (opensolaris and qlc) a known-not-work-configuration or is
there a howto that I need to follow?
I'm not aware of any known cases and didn't find any with a quick
search. I'd suggest filing a bug.
It was OK on 2008.05. Looking at the log,
[ Dec 17 09:09:09
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
/sbin/sh[1]: exec: /lib/svc/method/svc-coreadm: not found
[ Dec 17 09:09:09 Method start exited with status 127. ]
seems like this service shouldn't exists on 2008.11, and I can safely
disable it, right?
No, that indicates something is wrong
(CC-ing both lists, since I post the question to both under different
subject)
sim wrote:
Ok,
In my situation qlogic cannot get insync on second FC port (I can see it on
switch).
If you want just bypass loading of qcl driver, before booting the system add
in grub this:
-B
Hi,
I'm having problems running opensolaris 2008.11 on HP blade, with disks
on HP smart array. It hangs during boot process (tested both with
install CD and with pkg image-update from 2008.05). The server also has
qlogic HBA (unused).
I got a feedback that the problem might be due to the qlogic
Hi folks,
I'm using opensolaris snv_98 on HP blade with CPQary3 v1.91 driver.
This seems to be the latest version that can run on this hardware.
Newer versions (including 101a, updated with pkg image-update) simply
waits forever after displaying Use is subject to license terms.
Anybody got it
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody got it working, or is it simply HP's fault, and I need to wait
for new driver version?
Have you tried re-installing the driver after an upgrade ?
Tried it already
61 matches
Mail list logo
