[efloraofindia:327588] Re: SK2080 27 July 2019

*Scleromitrion angustifolium* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Benth. is treated as a syn. of *Scleromitrion tenelliflorum *(Blume) Korth. in Catalogue of Life ; On Sun, 18 Aug 2019

[efloraofindia:327587] Re: SK2080 27 July 2019

Here is a paper showing differences between confusingly similar species Scleromitrion sirayanum (Rubiaceae: Spermacoceae), a new species of the Hedyotis-Oldenlandia complex in Taiwan - Tian-Chuan HSU, and Zhi-Hao CHEN- Taiwania 62(2): 151‒156

Re: [efloraofindia:327583] oldenlandia herbaceae for validation

Thank you forcthe confirmation Garg ji Regards Sent from my iPad > On 17-Aug-2019, at 21:06, J.M. Garg wrote: > > Appears to be very good images of Oldenlandia stocksii Hook.f. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: mohina macker > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 at 12:58 > Subject: [eflor

Re: [efloraofindia:327582] Gagea tenera Pascher from Kashmir-GS08201909

Thanks a lot, Singh ji, for taking up this genus. It is really really difficult one, with not much inf. in efi site. You are kindly requested to have a look at postings in efi site and point out the mistakes. This way we will have one genus correctly checked and validated by an expert like you. On

Re: [efloraofindia:327581] Tree 02 for id from Gori Valley:: NS July 2019-03

Hi, Paradesi ji, PL. see the shape of the fruit in *Uncaria sessilifructus* at http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=119538&flora_id=2 It looks quite different compared to those posted by Nidhan ji. On Sat, 17 Aug 2

Re: [efloraofindia:327580] 06072013 ASP 82

Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 21:47, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's O. umbellata only, Garg Ji, > With Regards. > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019, 20:37 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Yes, Oldenlandia umbellate >>

[efloraofindia:327579] Re: Gagea dschungarica Regel from Kashmir-GS08201905

Here is the complete list of *Gagea* species in India. All are discussed in S. I. Ali and I.G. Levichev, eFlora of Pakistan at http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=113125 1. *Gagea bashoensis* Ali , 2006.

Re: [efloraofindia:327574] Tree 02 for id from Gori Valley:: NS July 2019-03

*Nidhan Ji*, please check with which provide information Garg Ji if you have material, then finalize species, With regards. On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 23:08, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Garg Ji, how can we measure to the fruits and shape too, there is not > clearly a

Re: [efloraofindia:327573] Tree 02 for id from Gori Valley:: NS July 2019-03

Garg Ji, how can we measure to the fruits and shape too, there is not clearly a single fruit, there is only clumped fruits with inflorescence, that's why only I took which character(stipules) differentiate with photos. with regards. On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 10:33, J.M. Garg wrote: > Uncaria scande

Re: [efloraofindia:327572] 150819EPT7

Thank you very much for ID help and appreciation E.P.Tensingh On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 5:43 AM Ushadi Micromini wrote: > indian pokeweed > > all parts are poisonous, > > > Wonderful crisp sharp photographs > appreciated > > usha di > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:31 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < > para

[efloraofindia:327571] Neanotis wightiana in FOI

Neanotis wightiana in FOI looks different as per Research Gate (plate) Biolib

Re: [efloraofindia:327569] 06072013 ASP 82

It's O. umbellata only, Garg Ji, With Regards. On Sat, Aug 17, 2019, 20:37 J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, Oldenlandia umbellate > > as > suggested by Santhosh ji. > > -- Forwarded message

[efloraofindia:327563] Fwd: [indiantreepix:19669] For id - neanotis sp. - Kas_sept 09_SSN

Yes. Images are of *Oldenlandia stocksii Hook.f.* as suggested by Aparna ji. On Saturday, 24 October 2009 22:12:35 UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance pl. > > E

Re: [efloraofindia:327557] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS : 1324

this must have been way up there how ever did you get them? thanks usha di On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 8:22 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Bimal ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Bimal Sar kar > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 19:25 > Subject: SYMBIOSIS : 1324 > To: > > > Attaching a

Re: [efloraofindia:327556] Gagea sp. from Gulmarg, Kashmir for ID-GS08201901

very nice yellow with green streaks , how big are these lily flowers? thanks, Gurcharanji. regards usha di On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 7:32 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Gagea sp for ID from Gulmarg Kashmir, alt. 2500 m, May 14, 2012. > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Kh

Re: [efloraofindia:327555] ID this Rubiaceae member pleas

Hi, Lalithamba ji, On further checking, you may be right. But I do not know why it looks somewhat different. On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 20:21, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Lalithamba ji, > But to me it does not matches with images at *Leptopetalum pteritum* > (Blume) Neupane & N.Wikstr. >

[efloraofindia:327553] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS : 1324

Thanks, Bimal ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 19:25 Subject: SYMBIOSIS : 1324 To: Attaching a collage of Common Dartlet visiting flowers of Terminalia chebula( HARTAKI ) -- With regards, J.M.Garg 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora &

Re: [efloraofindia:327553] ID this Rubiaceae member pleas

Thanks, Lalithamba ji, But to me it does not matches with images at *Leptopetalum pteritum* (Blume) Neupane & N.Wikstr. Pl. also see FOC illustration

Re: [efloraofindia:327552] Gagea sp. from Gulmarg, Kashmir for ID-GS08201901

Gagea reticulata (Pall.) Schult. & Schult.f. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 7:47 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Gagea sp for ID from Gulmarg Kashmir, alt. 2500 m, May 14, 2012. > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi,

[efloraofindia:327550] SYMBIOSIS : 1324

Attaching a collage of Common Dartlet visiting flowers of Terminalia chebula( HARTAKI ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr..

Re: [efloraofindia:327549] 04092013 BRS 509

gargji that red screen comes up and now it does not go away can you give the url rather than link so we can copy paste rather than click on link? it would be easier and more fuitful On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 3:22 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it looks more close to images at *Oldenlandia umbella

Re: [efloraofindia:327548] Saccharum spontaneum----for sharing and validation

wonderful they have almost disappeared from the greens inside kolkata , in sprawling countryside, and along the hooghly river in the metropolitan areas. cement jungle has sprouted. and a few stands outside are well guarded secrets now. On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 3:32 PM 'Satish Nikam' via efloraofin

Re: [efloraofindia:327547] Fwd: [itpmods:13012] Fwd: Marathon Man- Sh. Saroj Kasaju

one case i point here is an example of mindless game they play : Thread was "Fwd: Photo from Jampanicsrao Rao https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/Fwd$3A$20Photo$20from$20Jampanicsrao$20Rao%7Csort:date/indiantreepix/rsAzIFB5Cik/hToIllBXAgAJ and he the sender is a prof of bota

Re: [efloraofindia:327546] [EfloraofIndia_Rubiaceae week_ 060212PD03_Hedyotis corymbosa_Flora of Odisha]

1 and 3 are the same flower, a different angle, four petaled 2 is five petaled 4 cant say, though leaves are single veined and small, unlike what see for Mitrasacme indicaon the net. i remember, Prasad dash is a careful worker, please ask him, before pronouncing verdicts. thanks On Sat, Aug 1

Re: [efloraofindia:327545] Fwd: SK2085 29 July 2019 - Mycophyta

I agree with you Mr. Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:16 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I feel detailed images are required. Spore print may not be possible for > an ordinary member. > Experts can very well identify species with detailed images except in > close cases, where sp

Re: [efloraofindia:327544] [EfloraofIndia_Rubiaceae week_ 060212PD03_Hedyotis corymbosa_Flora of Odisha]

Images 1,3 and 4 belong to the same sp. and 2nd from different sp ? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 5:19 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Paradesi ji. > > On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 17:01, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < > paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yore right, Garg Ji, th

Re: [efloraofindia:327542] ID request- 17092012-PKA1

Thanks, Radha ji. Flora of China (*Hedyotis biflora* (Linnaeus) Lamarck (syn: *Oldenlandia biflora* Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 119. 1753; *Hedyotis paniculata* (Linnaeus) Lamarck; *H. racemosa* Lamarck; *O. crassifolia* Candolle; *O.

[efloraofindia:327541] Fwd: [itpmods:13013] Fwd: Marathon Man- Sh. Saroj Kasaju

-- Forwarded message - From: Gurcharan Singh Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 17:30 Subject: Re: [itpmods:13013] Fwd: Marathon Man- Sh. Saroj Kasaju To: Saroj Kasaju Cc: Ushadi Micromini , itpmods < itpm...@googlegroups.com> Thanks Gargi ji, Ushadi who is always frank coming from her h

Re: [efloraofindia:327540] Re: Scrophularia himalensis ABAUG2019/02

Thank you Mr. Garg. I will do that in future. On Sat, 17 Aug, 2019, 5:06 PM J.M. Garg, wrote: > Hi, Ashwini ji, > You can post upto 8 mb in first post and than attach again upto 8 mb in > its reply. > Thus, you can post upto any amount but in successive replies in the same > thread. > > On Sat,

Re: [efloraofindia:327539] Re: Scrophularia himalensis ABAUG2019/02

Hi, Ashwini ji, You can post upto 8 mb in first post and than attach again upto 8 mb in its reply. Thus, you can post upto any amount but in successive replies in the same thread. On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 16:54, Ashwini Bhatia wrote: > Thanks. > > On 17 Aug 2019, at 13:55, J.M. Garg wrote: > > Yo

Re: [efloraofindia:327538] [EfloraofIndia_Rubiaceae week_ 060212PD03_Hedyotis corymbosa_Flora of Odisha]

Thanks a lot, Paradesi ji. On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 17:01, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yore right, Garg Ji, there are mix-up images, > The second one, not Oldenaldia et al and third one resembles Mitrasacme > indica, Loganiaceae member. > With regards. > > On Sat, 1

Re: [efloraofindia:327537] [EfloraofIndia_Rubiaceae week_ 060212PD03_Hedyotis corymbosa_Flora of Odisha]

Yore right, Garg Ji, there are mix-up images, The second one, not Oldenaldia et al and third one resembles Mitrasacme indica, Loganiaceae member. With regards. On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 16:29, J.M. Garg wrote: > I think there is a mix up of images here. > First image is of *Oldenlandia herbacea* (L

Re: [efloraofindia:327536] Re: Scrophularia himalensis ABAUG2019/02

Thanks. > On 17 Aug 2019, at 13:55, J.M. Garg wrote: > > You have to pay more. > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sat 17 Aug, 2019, 1:23 PM Ashwini Bhatia, > wrote: > Does it mean you now pay more to subscribe to 1TB plan? or the ITB plan now > costs the

Fwd: [efloraofindia:327533] Wild flower 03 for ID

I feel more closer to images at Oldenlandia corymbosa rather than those at Oldenlandia herbacea

Re: [efloraofindia:327530] Oldenlandia corymbosa L. SN Nov32

Correct wording should be: I think more closer to images at *Oldenlandia herbacea* (L.) Roxb. rather than those at *Oldenlandia corymbosa*

Re: [efloraofindia:327528] Fwd: SK2085 29 July 2019 - Mycophyta

I feel detailed images are required. Spore print may not be possible for an ordinary member. Experts can very well identify species with detailed images except in close cases, where spore print may be needed. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat 17 Aug, 2019, 11:12 AM Ushadi Micromini, wrote: > th

Re: [efloraofindia:327527] Re: Scrophularia himalensis ABAUG2019/02

You have to pay more. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat 17 Aug, 2019, 1:23 PM Ashwini Bhatia, wrote: > Does it mean you now pay more to subscribe to 1TB plan? or the ITB plan > now costs the same as 100 GB earlier? > > Thanks. > Ashwini > > On 17 Aug 2019, at 13:16, J.M. Garg wrote: > > I hav

Re: [efloraofindia:327526] Re: Scrophularia himalensis ABAUG2019/02

Does it mean you now pay more to subscribe to 1TB plan? or the ITB plan now costs the same as 100 GB earlier? Thanks. Ashwini > On 17 Aug 2019, at 13:16, J.M. Garg wrote: > > I have 1 TB now. i. e. 1000 Gb now from earlier 100 Gb subscription. > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sat

Re: [efloraofindia:327525] Re: Scrophularia himalensis ABAUG2019/02

I have 1 TB now. i. e. 1000 Gb now from earlier 100 Gb subscription. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat 17 Aug, 2019, 12:24 PM Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Dear Ashwini Ji, > > Better to upgrade to 100 GB at $ 19.99 per year. Suggestion ! > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at