Re: [efloraofindia:360908] Malhargad near Pune, MH :: Plectranthus barbatus :: ARK2020-090

Thank you Garg ji for validating. Regards Alka Khare On Sunday, October 4, 2020 at 10:09:13 PM UTC+5:30, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > > Thank you Mr. Garg ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 9:43 PM J.M. Garg > > wrote: > >> Yes, Plectranthus barbatus >>

Re: [efloraofindia:360907] TSPDEC2015-24-197:Images of Balanites roxburghii (Zygophyllaceae)

Thanks TPS Kumar ji for the upload. Superb images. Can you provide the location of this shrub . I wish to see the plant when I visit Bangalore. On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 8:20:58 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Singh ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Mon, 5 Oct,

[efloraofindia:360906] Re: JP240312 Balanites sp

No image is seen !!! On Saturday, March 24, 2012 at 11:04:55 AM UTC+5:30 Jui wrote: > Hello > > > > > >

Re: [efloraofindia:360903] Euphorbia Herb for ID : Bangalore : 01OCT20 : AK-02

Thanks Nathan Ji. Regards, Aarti On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 7:36 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Nathan ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Tue, 6 Oct, 2020, 12:47 am anisop...@gmail.com, > wrote: > >> Euphorbia prostrata. Note exerted fruits and hairs restricted to angles >> of

Re: [efloraofindia:360903] Amaranthaceae for ID : Bangalore : 30SEP20 : AK-28

Thanks Garg Ji. I take it as Gomphrena serrata, Syn Gomphrena celosioides. Then my earlier post from Sri Lanka, identified by Nidhan Ji would also be the same? Wild Herb for ID : Sri Lanka : 081112 : AK-3 On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 7:37 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > After going through the details and

Re: [efloraofindia:360902] Amaranthaceae for ID : Bangalore : 30SEP20 : AK-28

After going through the details and references at efloraofindia page, I would like to go with Catalogue of Life. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 6 Oct, 2020, 7:28 am Aarti S. Khale, wrote: > Garg Ji, > Gomphrena celosioides and Gomphrena serrata are shown as two different > Species in

Re: [efloraofindia:360901] Euphorbia Herb for ID : Bangalore : 01OCT20 : AK-02

Thanks a lot, Nathan ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 6 Oct, 2020, 12:47 am anisop...@gmail.com, wrote: > Euphorbia prostrata. Note exerted fruits and hairs restricted to angles > of fruits. > > On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 1:18:27 AM UTC-5 JM Garg wrote: > >> >> >> -- >> With regards,

[efloraofindia:360900] Fwd: Identification of weed plant

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Sam Kuzhalanattu Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 11:22 pm Subject: Re: Identification of weed plant To: J.M. Garg Dear Garg ji and all members, Thank you very much for identified my weed plant. I agreed it as Desmodium

Re: [efloraofindia:360899] Amaranthaceae for ID : Bangalore : 30SEP20 : AK-28

Garg Ji, Gomphrena celosioides and Gomphrena serrata are shown as two different Species in Flowersofindia. That was the reason for my confusion. Regards, Aarti On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 4:50 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > *Gomphrena celosioides* Mart. (syn. of *Gomphrena serrata* L. as per Catalogue > of

Re: [efloraofindia:360899] Euphorbia Herb for ID : Bangalore : 01OCT20 : AK-02

Euphorbia prostrata. Note exerted fruits and hairs restricted to angles of fruits. On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 1:18:27 AM UTC-5 JM Garg wrote: > > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 11:03 am J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise

Re: [efloraofindia:360897] Need help with apluda-like grass

Cymbopogon, With regards. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 22:14, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Fazal ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Fazal Rashid > Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 22:01 > Subject: [efloraofindia:360887] Need help with apluda-like grass > To: efloraofindia > > > Hi, > >

Re: [efloraofindia:360895] Need help with grass id - is this chloris?

It's Chloris only, With regards. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 22:03, Fazal Rashid wrote: > Bhopal; black soil; 5/10/2020 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [efloraofindia:360892] Please help with the id of this short grass

Check wit Setaria pumila, With regards. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 21:56, Fazal Rashid wrote: > Bhopal; black soi; 5/10/2020 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [efloraofindia:360892] Spiny Herb for ID, Rajasthan, NAW-JAN15-05

Thanks, Singh ji. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 21:51, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Fagonia cretica does not occur in India as per distribution list of major > databases as also BSI Flora of India. This is I think F. bruguieri only. > > On Saturday, February 14, 2015 at 9:11:24 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:360889] Re: Descriptions for Rubus

Thanks, Bijay ji. Some Flora were published, but all families were not covered. You can download pdfs of what ever was published at https://bsi.gov.in/page/en/flora-of-india On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 21:34, Bijay Khadka wrote: > Thank you Garg Ji!! > > Is there any taxonomic keys for *Rubus *sp in

Re: [efloraofindia:360887] Plant for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-11

Paradesi Ji, Saroj Ji, I have only one picture. We had parked the vehicle and since it was an unknown house, I took a picture from the car itself. Since someone can come out and object. That area was also unknown and very crowded. Yes, the stems are of the same plant, and it had gone up 5-6 feet

Re: [efloraofindia:360883] Plant for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-11

What about two thick stems in foreground? Same plant? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:59 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any other views ma'am, > With regards. > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 20:40, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > >> Thanks Nagendra Ji.

Re: [efloraofindia:360882] Re: Schefflera venulosa (Wight & Arn.) Harms

Manandhar book says Jan-Feb. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:32 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Saroj ji, > What is the flowering period mentioned in your books ? > To me appears close to specimens from Nepal, Bhutan and India in GBIF >

Re: [efloraofindia:360882] Spiny Herb for ID, Rajasthan, NAW-JAN15-05

Fagonia cretica does not occur in India as per distribution list of major databases as also BSI Flora of India. This is I think F. bruguieri only. On Saturday, February 14, 2015 at 9:11:24 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Kaushik ji. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From:

Re: [efloraofindia:360880] Plant for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-11

Any other views ma'am, With regards. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 20:40, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks Nagendra Ji. > It was like a vine climbing up. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 7:46:41 PM UTC+5:30, Chennuru Nagendra wrote: >> >> Could be kalanchoe species >> >> On

Re: [efloraofindia:360879] Amaranthaceae for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-10

Sorry, Nagendra Ji, it's not sessilis, variety of ficoidea only, With regards. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 20:42, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Nagendra Ji, > Thanks for the id. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 7:50:48 PM UTC+5:30, Chennuru Nagendra wrote: >> >> Alternanthera sessilis

[efloraofindia:360879] Re: Descriptions for Rubus

Thank you Garg Ji!! Is there any taxonomic keys for *Rubus *sp in Indian flora? Regards, Bijay On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 9:35:45 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Bijay ji. > There is a lot of confusion w.r.t. *Rubus indicus* Thunb., *Rubus rugosus* > Wight & *Rubus moluccanus* Hook.

Re: [efloraofindia:360875] Re: BK0029-Oct-03-2020 Ceropegia

Please check here Ceropegia ! May be other sp. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:28 PM Bijay khadka wrote: > It is not C.hookeri ( has inflorescence 1 or 2 flowered and corolla > narrowing gradually from base to

Re: [efloraofindia:360875] Re: Fagonia sps for identification

Thanks a lot, Singh ji. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 21:13, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Key to Fagonia in BSI Flora of India, clearly differentiates Fagonia > bruguieri DC. on the basis of spines longer than leaves and stem 4-angled, > seen in photographs. That confirms Fagonia bruguieri DC. > > On

Re: [efloraofindia:360873] Re: SK374 12FEB-2017:ID

Did not find listing of A. ciliata in Nepal unless it is a new to Nepal. Spilanthes Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:38 PM Bijay Khadka wrote: > Yes It is not *A paniculata *as per its characters. > Other options

[efloraofindia:360873] Re: Grass for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-08

Garg Ji, Manoj Ji, Thanks for the follow up and id of this grass. Regards, Aarti On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:05 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Manoj ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Manoj Chandran <> > Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 8:31 pm >

[efloraofindia:360872] Re: Descriptions for Rubus

There is a lot of confusion w.r.t. *Rubus indicus* Thunb., *Rubus rugosus* Sm. & *Rubus moluccanus* Hook. f. Online Flora of Nepal has some details of *Rubus rugosus* Sm. I do not have keys in Indian floras for Genus Rubus. On

Re: [efloraofindia:360872] Re: SK374 12FEB-2017:ID

Yes It is not *A paniculata *as per its characters. Other options could be *A. calva*, *A. ciliata* Regards, Bijay On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 9:02:09 PM UTC+5:45 Bijay Khadka wrote: > Yes Garg Ji! > Need to check it, with details.. > > Regards, > Bijay > > On Monday, October 5, 2020 at

[efloraofindia:360870] Re: Descriptions for Rubus

Thanks, Bijay ji. There is a lot of confusion w.r.t. *Rubus indicus* Thunb., *Rubus rugosus* Wight & *Rubus moluccanus* Hook. f. We have bunched them together at Rubus rugosus as per discussions at Rubus

Re: [efloraofindia:360869] Re: BK0029-Oct-03-2020 Ceropegia

It is not C.hookeri ( has inflorescence 1 or 2 flowered and corolla narrowing gradually from base to throat) , but here it is 4-5 flowered and corolla bulbous at base, Also corolla lobes are different. Regards, Bijay On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 12:24 PM Bijay Khadka wrote: > > *Not satisfied with

[efloraofindia:360869] Re: Fagonia sps for identification

Key to Fagonia in BSI Flora of India, clearly differentiates Fagonia bruguieri DC. on the basis of spines longer than leaves and stem 4-angled, seen in photographs. That confirms Fagonia bruguieri DC. On Sunday, February 23, 2014 at 1:13:29 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > A reply: >

[efloraofindia:360867] Fwd: Grass for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-08

Thanks a lot, Manoj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Manoj Chandran <> Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 8:31 pm Subject: Re: Grass for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-08 To: J.M. Garg Digitaria setigera On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 8:43 PM J.M. Garg wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:360866] JP240312 Balanites sp

Thanks, Singh ji, I will check and revert back within a few days. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 8:23 pm Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > Garg ji > Should we not shift under B. roxburghii only along with images. > > On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 at 2:36:32 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:360865] Need help with sessile grass id

Thanks a lot, Manoj ji. Hi, Fazal ji, Pl. provide necessary details as requested. -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Manoj Chandran <> Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 8:29 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:360413] Need help with sessile grass id To: J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:360864] small tree for id mm1 30012012

Thanks a lot, Tapas ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 8:35 pm Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > The verticillate leaves with perulate terminal buds point to Actinodaphne. > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020, 19:55 Mohina Macker, wrote: > >> Thank you for this information Tapas Ji >> >> >> Sent

Fwd: [efloraofindia:360863] Fwd: Regarding identification of Alysicarpus sp.

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Dilipkumar Undirwade Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 8:41 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:360725] Fwd: Regarding identification of Alysicarpus sp. To: Saroj Kasaju Cc: J.M. Garg Thanks to all respected sir. For id of said

Re: [efloraofindia:360863] Re: SK374 12FEB-2017:ID

Yes Garg Ji! Need to check it, with details.. Regards, Bijay On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 4:29:29 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > No, it is not Acmella paniculata > >

Re: [efloraofindia:360862] Amaranthaceae for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-10

Nagendra Ji, Thanks for the id. Regards, Aarti On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 7:50:48 PM UTC+5:30, Chennuru Nagendra wrote: > > Alternanthera sessilis > > > On Monday, October 5, 2020, Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Seen growing wild. >> Alternanthera Species? >> Aarti >> >> -- >> You received

Re: [efloraofindia:360861] Plant for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-11

Thanks Nagendra Ji. It was like a vine climbing up. Regards, Aarti On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 7:46:41 PM UTC+5:30, Chennuru Nagendra wrote: > > Could be kalanchoe species > > On Monday, October 5, 2020, Saroj Kasaju > > wrote: > >> >> Does not look like Piper sp. Ficus sp. ?? >> Thank you.

Re: [efloraofindia:360860] Plant for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-11

Thanks Saroj Ji. Regards, Aarti On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 6:54:51 PM UTC+5:30, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > > Does not look like Piper sp. Ficus sp. ?? > Thank you. > Saroj Kasaju > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 6:35 pm, Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Seen growing on a house compound wall. >> Piper

Re: [efloraofindia:360858] small tree for id mm1 30012012

The verticillate leaves with perulate terminal buds point to Actinodaphne. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020, 19:55 Mohina Macker, wrote: > Thank you for this information Tapas Ji > > > Sent from my iPad > > On 05-Oct-2020, at 18:47, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > >  > Molecular studies revealed that the genus

Re: [efloraofindia:360858] Amaranthaceae for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-09

Thanks for the id Nagendra Ji. Regards, Aarti On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 7:52:19 PM UTC+5:30, Chennuru Nagendra wrote: > > Amaranthus viridis > > On Monday, October 5, 2020, Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Seen growing wild. >> Amaranthus caudatus? >> Aarti >> >> -- >> You received this

Re: [efloraofindia:360857] Need help with common grass id

Yes It could be *Eragrostis tenella* as of floral stalk.. Regards, Bijay On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 8:34:38 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Manoj ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Manoj Chandran <> > Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 7:25 pm

Re: [efloraofindia:360856] Re: BK0030-Oct-03-2020

It is more closer to *Saxifraga cinerea* Harry Sm. than *Saxifraga stolitzka.* As of basal part.. Thank you for suggestions.. Regards, Bijay On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 8:33:18 PM UTC+5:45 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Thank you Rawat ji. > Saroj Kasaju > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 8:16 pm, D.S

Re: [efloraofindia:360854] JP240312 Balanites sp

Garg ji Should we not shift under B. roxburghii only along with images. On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 at 2:36:32 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for any assistance in the matter please. > > On 24 March 2012 11:04, Jui wrote: > >> Hello >> >> >>

[efloraofindia:360855] Re: SK 2770 05 October 2020 - Mycophyta

Is it in pine forest or other mixed tree forest..?? Boletaceae member Regards, Bijay On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 1:46:54 PM UTC+5:45 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:45 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Dear Members, >> Location: Sankhu,

Re: [efloraofindia:360852] TSPDEC2015-24-197:Images of Balanites roxburghii (Zygophyllaceae)

Thanks a lot, Singh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 8:18 pm Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > Yes there is only one species of Balanites roxburghii Planch. in India. > While describing this in FBI Vol. 1, Page 527 A. Bennett wrote "very nearly > allied to, and perhaps only a

Fwd: [efloraofindia:360849] Need help with common grass id

Thanks, Manoj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Manoj Chandran <> Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 7:25 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:360741] Need help with common grass id To: J.M. Garg Eragrostis tenella On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 9:31 PM J.M. Garg wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:360851] TSPDEC2015-24-197:Images of Balanites roxburghii (Zygophyllaceae)

Yes there is only one species of Balanites roxburghii Planch. in India. While describing this in FBI Vol. 1, Page 527 A. Bennett wrote "very nearly allied to, and perhaps only a variety of, the B. aegyptiaca of Northern and Tropical Africa". BSI Flora of India, Vol. 4 also records only B.

Re: [efloraofindia:360849] Re: BK0030-Oct-03-2020

Thank you Rawat ji. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 8:16 pm, D.S Rawat wrote: > *Saxifraga cinerea* suggested by Saroj Ji seems correct to me. > > DSRawat, Pantnagar > > On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 2:51:26 PM UTC+5:30, Bijay Khadka wrote: >> >> Saxifragaceae >> >> Location: Trans-

[efloraofindia:360849] Re: BK0030-Oct-03-2020

*Saxifraga cinerea* suggested by Saroj Ji seems correct to me. DSRawat, Pantnagar On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 2:51:26 PM UTC+5:30, Bijay Khadka wrote: > > Saxifragaceae > > Location: Trans- Himalayas, Central Nepal, on the way to Manang > Elevation: 3000-3600m asl > Date: November 2017 >

Re: [efloraofindia:360847] small tree for id mm1 30012012

Thank you for this information Tapas Ji Sent from my iPad > On 05-Oct-2020, at 18:47, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > >  > Molecular studies revealed that the genus Persea is restricted to tropical > America. All the Asian species referred to this genus belong to Machilus. So, > the Indian

Re: [efloraofindia:360846] Amaranthaceae for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-09

Amaranthus viridis On Monday, October 5, 2020, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Seen growing wild. > Amaranthus caudatus? > Aarti > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [efloraofindia:360845] Amaranthaceae for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-10

Alternanthera sessilis On Monday, October 5, 2020, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Seen growing wild. > Alternanthera Species? > Aarti > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

Re: [efloraofindia:360843] Plant for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-11

Could be kalanchoe species On Monday, October 5, 2020, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Does not look like Piper sp. Ficus sp. ?? > Thank you. > Saroj Kasaju > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 6:35 pm, Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Seen growing on a house compound wall. >> Piper Species? >> >> Aarti >> >> -- >>

Re: [efloraofindia:360843] Fwd: [itpmods:14825] Revision of Indian Neolitsea (Lauraceae)

Excellent and very useful work Tapas Ji.. Congratulations...!!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

Re: [efloraofindia:360842] ID request SP03101015

Check with Dicliptera cuneata On Monday, October 5, 2020, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Gurcharan Singh > Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 6:08 pm > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:360831] ID request SP03101015 > To: efloraofindia

Fwd: [efloraofindia:360840] ID request SP03101015

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Gurcharan Singh Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 6:08 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:360831] ID request SP03101015 To: efloraofindia Looks like a species of Dicliptera. On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 4:59:36 PM UTC+5:30 JM

Fwd: [itpmods:14821] Fwd: [efloraofindia:360841] Rediscovery of Madhuca diplostemon after a hiatus of 184 years

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Prashant Awale Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 6:03 pm Subject: Re: [itpmods:14821] Fwd: [efloraofindia:360418] Rediscovery of Madhuca diplostemon after a hiatus of 184 years To: itpmods That is really great. Hearty

[efloraofindia:360836] Fwd: [itpmods:14825] Revision of Indian Neolitsea (Lauraceae)

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Giby Kuriakose Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 6:50 pm Subject: Re: [itpmods:14825] Revision of Indian Neolitsea (Lauraceae) To: itpmods This is nice work. Congratulations and thanks for sharing. Regards Giby On Mon, Oct 5,

[efloraofindia:360837] Fwd: [itpmods:14823] Revision of Indian Neolitsea (Lauraceae)

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Prashant Awale Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 6:30 pm Subject: Re: [itpmods:14823] Revision of Indian Neolitsea (Lauraceae) To: itpmods Thanks a lot Tapas ji. Hearty congratulations. Regards Prashant On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at

[efloraofindia:360836] Fwd: [itpmods:14822] Fwd: Why are new species more likely to be published based on efloraofindia observations?

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Prashant Awale Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 6:26 pm Subject: Re: [itpmods:14822] Fwd: Why are new species more likely to be published based on efloraofindia observations? To: itpmods Very true Garg ji. Regards Prashant On

Re: [efloraofindia:360835] Plant for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-11

Does not look like Piper sp. Ficus sp. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 6:35 pm, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Seen growing on a house compound wall. > Piper Species? > > Aarti > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group.

Re: [efloraofindia:360834] small tree for id mm1 30012012

Molecular studies revealed that the genus Persea is restricted to tropical America. All the Asian species referred to this genus belong to Machilus. So, the Indian species of Persea are now Machilus. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020, 17:39 J.M. Garg, wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - >

Re: [efloraofindia:360831] ID request SP03101015

Looks like a species of Dicliptera. On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 4:59:36 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Sheetal Pachpande > Date: 10 October 2015 at 21:58 > Subject: [efloraofindia:233224] ID

Re: [efloraofindia:360829] Fwd: Herb from Nilgiris for id 160211MK2

Hi all, I think the plant is *Veronica polita* Fries On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:16 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > A reply from David ji: > "You have what looks to be *V. arvensis* mixed - notice the small > very short-stalked flowers and the upper flower leaves are like tongues - > Image 1 >

[efloraofindia:360825] Re: Scroph

This plant is *Scrophularia peregrina* L. On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:07 PM JM Garg wrote: > I think it should be Scrophularia peregrina as per > http://www.maltawildplants.com/SCRO/Scrophularia_peregrina.php > > http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:809430-1 >

Re: [efloraofindia:360824] Scrophulariaceae herb for identification :: MKMAY012

The herb looks very much like B*acopa floribunda*. Thank you Lalithamba ji. On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:40 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Lalithamba ji. > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 13:51, lalithamba wrote: > >> It is Baccopa floribunda >> >> On Friday, 4 September 2020 at 13:24:50 UTC+5:30 Saroj

[efloraofindia:360823] Re: Schefflera venulosa (Wight & Arn.) Harms

Hi, Saroj ji, What is the flowering period mentioned in your books ? To me appears close to specimens from Nepal, Bhutan and India in GBIF . Pl. see

Re: [efloraofindia:360819] Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this plant at Ooty :: 02012014 :: ARK-03

Thanks, Muthu ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 5:11 pm Muthu Karthick, wrote: > Yes Garg ji, the images from Missouri Botanical Garden confirm the same. *S. > nodosa* has a different leaf margin. > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 10:19 AM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you

[efloraofindia:360819] Re: Herb from Nilgiris for id 280211MK2

Yes Garg ji, This herb is *Scrophularia peregrina* L. On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:06 PM JM Garg wrote: > I think it should be Scrophularia peregrina as per > http://www.maltawildplants.com/SCRO/Scrophularia_peregrina.php > >

Re: [efloraofindia:360817] Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this plant at Ooty :: 02012014 :: ARK-03

Yes Garg ji, the images from Missouri Botanical Garden confirm the same. *S. nodosa* has a different leaf margin. On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 10:19 AM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 9:45 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Introduced. Mentioned in

Re: [efloraofindia:360814] Re: Herbaceous weed id please

Thank you very much Garg ji. Warm regards Dr. B. Subramaniam On Mon, 5 Oct 2020, 13:28 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me appears close to *Ludwigia octovalvis* (Jacq.) P.H.Raven > > as > per details

[efloraofindia:360814] Re: Pink Roses : Flower Show, Lalbagh Botanical Gardens : Bangalore : 03OCT20 : AK-06

Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 3:12 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > There are so many cultivars. > It should be same as in Pink Roses for ID : Bangalore : 01OCT20 : AK-03 > > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 20:24, Aarti S.

[efloraofindia:360813] Re: SK 2768 03 October 2020

I think *Triumfetta annua* L. as per comparative images at Triumfetta On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 22:53, Saroj Kasaju

[efloraofindia:360812] Re: Sept.'20 - Most Active Posters

Thanks Garg ji. It has always been a great pleasure to be associated with efloraofindia.Hearty congrats to all other active posters. Regards, Shobha Chavda. On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 11:22 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Most Active Posters in Sept.'20 are as below: > > me (951) > Saroj Kumar Kasaju (706)

Re: [efloraofindia:360811] Re: SK374 12FEB-2017:ID

No, it is not Acmella paniculata (does not have ray florets) as per details and images herein. I had earlier identified it as Acmella ciliata

Re: [efloraofindia:360810] BK0030-Oct-03-2020

Thank you Saroj Ji!! I could not find a photo of basal leaves. Regards, Bijay On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:08 PM Bijay khadka wrote: > Thank you Garg Ji! > I will follow it. > > Regards, > Bijay > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:20 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Saxifraga cinerea Harry Sm.- Endemic to

Re: [efloraofindia:360809] BK0030-Oct-03-2020

Thank you Garg Ji! I will follow it. Regards, Bijay On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:20 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Saxifraga cinerea Harry Sm.- Endemic to Nepal ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 12:43 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Hi, Bijay ji, >> If you were sure about genus,

[efloraofindia:360807] Re: Pink Roses : Flower Show, Lalbagh Botanical Gardens : Bangalore : 03OCT20 : AK-06

There are so many cultivars. It should be same as in Pink Roses for ID : Bangalore : 01OCT20 : AK-03 On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 20:24, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > These Pink Roses were seen at the Flower Show held in Jan,20. > Similar

Re: [efloraofindia:360806] Re: Plant for ID : Nasik : 03OCT20 : AK-04

Image is small to see any details. However, may be same as at Wild Plant for ID : Bangalore : 29SEP20 : AK-27 On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 20:11, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks

Re: [efloraindia:95853] Fwd: [efloraofindia:360805] ID No. 26042011 RD12

Oh..sorry..somehow I missed it. Thanks, Dipankar Ji. :-) Regards, Ritesh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Fwd: [efloraofindia:360804] Lauraceae for ID Persea ?? AT MAR 2017/16

Thanks, Anil ji. -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 2:01 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:265306] Lauraceae for ID Persea ?? AT MAR 2017/16 To: J.M. Garg Not matching with Machilus odoratissima. Leaves size and

Re: [efloraofindia:360803] Fwd: White flower Peduicularis

I guessed the same ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:08 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Great help, Arti ji. > Thanks a lot. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Arti Garg > Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 13:45 > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:360209] Fwd: White flower

Fwd: [efloraofindia:360802] Fwd: White flower Peduicularis

Great help, Arti ji. Thanks a lot. -- Forwarded message - From: Arti Garg Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 13:45 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:360209] Fwd: White flower Peduicularis To: J.M. Garg This appears to be a variant of Pedicularis bifida, but not the same. Sincerely, Arti

[efloraofindia:360801] Re: SK1834 07 April 2019

Thank you Lila ji! Any idea about the fruiting season ? Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:50 PM lila wrote: > I guess its Persea and more likely P gamblei. Probably you have already > checked this. > > Regards, > Lila > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:29 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Re:

Re: [efloraofindia:360798] Re: Aeschynanthus sp. help

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:01 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Saroj ji, > It is rightly identified by you. > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 1:17 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > >> Any comments ? >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Wed,

Re: [efloraofindia:360798] Re: Aeschynanthus sp. help

Hi, Saroj ji, It is rightly identified by you. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 1:17 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Any comments ? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:59 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> *Scurrula elata* (Edgeworth) Danser >> Thank you >> Saroj

[efloraofindia:360793] Re: SK1834 07 April 2019

I guess its Persea and more likely P gamblei. Probably you have already checked this. Regards, Lila On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:29 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Re: SK1834 07 April 2019 > >

Re: [efloraofindia:360792] Re: Climber from Bilaspur

Hi, Bala ji, Pl. show us the side view of the flower ? On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 10:52, Bala Subramaniam wrote: > Is it Ipomoea obscura? > Dr. B. Subramaniam > > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2020, 08:26 Bala Subramaniam, > wrote: > >> Dear All, >> Request for id of a climber from Bilaspur. Appears to be a

Re: [efloraofindia:360789] Re: Herbaceous weed id please

To me appears close to *Ludwigia octovalvis* (Jacq.) P.H.Raven as per details and comparative images at Ludwigia

Re: [efloraofindia:360788] Re: Aeschynanthus sp. help

Any comments ? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:59 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > *Scurrula elata* (Edgeworth) Danser > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 8:22 pm, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Check >>

[efloraofindia:360786] Re: SK1834 07 April 2019

Re: SK1834 07 April 2019 Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:24 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Any idea Lila Ji !? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at

Re: [efloraofindia:360786] Fwd: [itpmods:14809] Revision of Indian Neolitsea (Lauraceae)

Thank you Tapas Da for such a nice compilation work. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 12:03 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: D.S Rawat > Date: Mon, 5 Oct, 2020, 11:37 am > Subject: Re: [itpmods:14809] Revision of

[efloraofindia:360784] Re: SK1834 07 April 2019

Any idea Lila Ji !? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:23 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Lila ji ! Any idea ? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 12:38 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. >> >> Some earlier

[efloraofindia:360784] Re: SK1834 07 April 2019

Lila ji ! Any idea ? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 12:38 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > It looks like* Alseodaphne semecarpifolia *Nees- from Radha ji > > > Not sure since since it is

Re: [efloraofindia:360783] BK0030-Oct-03-2020

Saxifraga cinerea Harry Sm.- Endemic to Nepal ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 12:43 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Bijay ji, > If you were sure about genus, you should have told, as it helps us > in properly utilizing our precious human resources. > Otherwise also even if you

Re: [efloraofindia:360782] POLYGONACEAE FORTNIGHT 1-14 May 2014: Polygonum hydropiper from Himachal GSG-05

On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 17:38, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 21:21, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Ritesh ji. >> >> On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 17:03, Ritesh Kumar Choudhary >> wrote: >> >>> This is not P. glabra. I'll get back to you soon. >>> Regards, >>> Ritesh >>> >> >> >> -- >> With

[efloraofindia:360781] There is no dearth of work at efloraofindia

Dear members, During my deep involvement in efloraofindia, I find that there is no dearth of work. For the past so many years, our activities have stabilized in the sense of no. of topics and messages. However, I find there is no dearth of work. We are only able to do as much as our time permits.

Re: [efloraofindia:360780] BK0030-Oct-03-2020

Hi, Bijay ji, If you were sure about genus, you should have told, as it helps us in properly utilizing our precious human resources. Otherwise also even if you were not sure, you should have indicated something like a Saxifraga species ? On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 12:14, Bijay Khadka wrote: > Thank

  1   2   >