Re: [efloraofindia:388895] Asteraceae Fortnight Part I-Radiate Heads: Senecio? for id from VOF- NS 81

Thanks, Singh ji. I also could not find any match as per comparative images at Senecio On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 11:09, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > White tomentose leaves don't go for S. wightii, we have to establish if it > really is Senecio. > > On

Re: [efloraofindia:388894] ID requested: Unid herb, dry deciduous forests, Mudumalai, Nilgiris, TN

It seems Boraginaceae herb, Cyanoglossum or related genus. On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, 15:11 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Difficult to say in vegetative stage. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Hari Venu Radha > Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 22:04 > Subject: [efloraofindia:388167] ID requested:

Re: [efloraofindia:388893] I'd requested 13

Not yet! Regards, Seema Bin Zeenat M.sc Botany Department of Botany, School of Biosciences and Biotechnology. BGSB University, Rajouri- 185234, J, India On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, 8:33 AM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > No flowers yet ? Looks like Clematis sp. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Wed, 16 Jun

Re: [efloraofindia:388892] Asteraceae member for ID from Uttarakhand: DSR_Nov. 2016_2/2

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Launaea species- Jageshwar Group discussion at Asteraceae member for ID from Uttarakhand: DSR_Nov. 2016_2/2 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:388890] I'd requested 12

Barleria cristata ! Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 8:26 am, Seema Bin Zeenat wrote: > Location: Rajouri jandk > > > Regards, > Seema Bin Zeenat > M.sc Botany > Department of Botany, > School of Biosciences and Biotechnology. > BGSB University, Rajouri- 185234, J, India > > -- >

Re: [efloraofindia:388888] I'd requested 13

No flowers yet ? Looks like Clematis sp. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 8:28 am, Seema Bin Zeenat wrote: > Location: Rajouri, jandk > > Regards, > Seema Bin Zeenat > M.sc Botany > Department of Botany, > School of Biosciences and Biotechnology. > BGSB University, Rajouri- 185234,

Re: [efloraofindia:388883] senecio? at 2400m

Yes, it appears so. On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 10:37, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > I guess this should be Synotis cappa (Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don) C.Jeffrey & > Y.L.Chen > ! > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:388882] Re: Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea? from VOF for id -NS 14

Forwarding for Id Distributed as Launaea species- enroute to Ghanghariya from Gobind Ghat At that altitude most likely species with slightly

[efloraofindia:388880] Re: SK998 7 MAR-2018

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Launaea species- Dolalghat, Nepal Group discussion at SK998 7 MAR-2018 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:388878] Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea procumbens from Panipat for validation-NS 15

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Launaea procumbens ? Group discussion at Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea procumbens from Panipat for validation-NS

Re: [efloraofindia:388876] Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea procumbens for validation From Panipat-NS 13

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Launaea procumbens ? Group discussion at Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea procumbens for validation From Panipat-NS

Re: [efloraofindia:388874] Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate heads (plus Misc.): Launaea sp at Mumbai :: PKA15:

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Launaea procumbens ? Group discussion at Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate heads (plus Misc.): Launaea sp at Mumbai :: PKA15:

[efloraofindia:388872] Re: [indiantreepix:9103] Re: For ID 280109ET 63

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Launaea procumbens ? Group discussion at For ID 280109ET 63 (google.com) On

[efloraofindia:388870] Re: SK367 05FEB-2017:ID

Forwarding for Id Distributed as Launaea asplenifolia ? Youngia japonica seems better match Group discussion at SK367 05FEB-2017:ID (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:388868] Fwd: Combretum nanum @ Khargar Hills

In any case, the flowers are 4-merous as well which reveal the identity. On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, 11:55 Samir Mehta, wrote: > Four are seen but maybe a fifth on the ar side which is not seen. > > Regards, > > Samir Mehta > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021, 10:21 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> How many

Re: [efloraofindia:388867] plant for ID

I forgot to tell you that I found KEY to three *Agave *- https://keybase.rbg.vic.gov.au/keys/show/7710 and saved a screenshot following the steps thereon. Thank you With regards surajit koley On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 19:41, surajit koley wrote: > Please, also note, leaf base in this specimen

[efloraofindia:388866] Re: Id Rhamnus species.

Thanks a lot, Rawat ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 6:09 pm GOPAL SINGH Rawat, wrote: > Pls check *Sageretia theezans* (Rhamnaceae). > > GS Rawat > --- > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:41 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> Some earlier

[efloraofindia:388865] Re: Id Rhamnus species.

Thanks, Ashutosh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 2:52 pm Ashutosh Sharma, wrote: > Not Rhamnus it's Sageretia thea (Rhamnaceae) or if following powo it > should be called Sageretia brandrethiana Aitch. Actually there are several > other species known from Western Himalaya

Re: [efloraofindia:388864] plant for ID

Please, also note, leaf base in this specimen are not significantly fleshy (thick). Thank you With regards surajit koley On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 19:32, surajit koley wrote: > Sir, > > I still do not know if *Agave* *americana* has been naturalized in our > country or not. Even if it is

Re: [efloraofindia:388863] plant for ID

Sir, I still do not know if *Agave* *americana* has been naturalized in our country or not. Even if it is naturalized, there must have been some mother or grandmother or great grandmother plant nearby. However, as per lucidcentral, (1), the leaves of *A. americana* are not flexuous, that is why

Re: [efloraofindia:388862] Agave americana

Strong and sharp apical spine, clearly visible at the top left of the plate , considerably thick leaf base, crenate (situate) margins in young leaves, I would suggest *Agave americana* L. Is this specimen wild? Thank you With regards surajit koley On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 13:57, J.M. Garg

[efloraofindia:388861] Re: Need id assistance of JNU campus plant 080415SP1/2

Sir, Based on the general appearance of the plant, I too would suggest *A. angustifolia* Haw. Thank you With regards surajit koley On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 13:55, J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Surajit ji, > What do you say about this one? > Is the id correct as *Agave angustifolia* Haw. >

Re: [efloraofindia:388860] Fwd: Asteraceae Week (Part I - Radiate heads) ::Wedelia sp??? at Andaman & Nicobar ::PKA60 ::

Yes, Sir, I missed the head count. But I didn't miss the presence of epicalyx like bracts (phyllaries) at the base of KEW-specimen capitulum (of *W. biflora*) which are invisible in the uploaded specimen. Thank you With regards surajit koley On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 12:06, J.M. Garg wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:388860] Re: Cersatium fontanum var. triviale from Kashmir

Yes C. glomeratum if we follow POWO On Monday, June 14, 2021 at 9:50:14 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Yes Tabish Ji ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 4:12 PM Tabish wrote: > >> In fact, now *Cerastium fontanum* subsp. *triviale* (E.H.L.Krause) Jalas >>

Re: [efloraofindia:388859] Caryophyllaceae Week: Cerastium fontanum subsp. fontanum from Kashmir

Yes C. glomeratum On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 9:35:19 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > I think it will be *Cerastium glomeratum* as per discussions at Confusion > between Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare and Cerastium glomeratum > and Id

Re: [efloraofindia:388858] Caryophyllaceae Week: Cerastium for Id from Panipat

Yes C. glomeratum On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 9:31:44 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > I think it will be *Cerastium glomeratum* as per discussions at Confusion > between Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare and Cerastium glomeratum > > >

Re: [efloraofindia:388857] Cerastium fontanum ABMAR01/07

C. glomeratum if we follow POWO On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 7:27:11 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > On further consideration, I think it will be *Cerastium glomeratum* as > per discussions at Confusion between Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare > and Cerastium glomeratum >

[efloraofindia:388855] Re: Id Rhamnus species.

Pls check *Sageretia theezans* (Rhamnaceae). GS Rawat --- On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:41 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > Yes, could not find a match as per existing species as per comparative > images at Rhamnus

Re: [efloraofindia:388855] I'd requested 1

Insufficient images of the plant species sent for ID. You are not following the guidelines and requests made by many senior members. Unfortunate. On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 2:04:31 PM UTC+5:30 seemabinzee786 wrote: > Ok, will do that. > > > Regards, > Seema Bin Zeenat > M.sc Botany >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:388853] Plant for ID: Kerala: 12th Jun 2021

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: M Swamy Date: Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 5:42 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:388716] Plant for ID: Kerala: 12th Jun 2021 To: J.M. Garg Thanks Garg ji . This plant species is very common near Trivandrum and one can see plenty

Re: [efloraofindia:388852] A new subspecies of Rungia longifolia from Southern Western Ghats

Thanks a lot, Santhosh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 5:16 pm Dr E S Santhosh Kumar, < santhoshkuma...@gmail.com> wrote: > GargJi, > Yes, you are right. According to John Wood, there is no Rungia exists, but > it was only his thought and treatment of genera of Acanthaceae.

Re: [efloraofindia:388852] Id request for this species of Arenaria .

Yes it is what we have been treating as C. fontanum (var. triviale), it is our choice whether we want to follow POWO and call it C. glomeratum or follow WFO and call it Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare. It is high time we decide and put boldly on our website which Database we are following. We

Re: [efloraofindia:388850] A new subspecies of Rungia longifolia from Southern Western Ghats

GargJi, Yes, you are right. According to John Wood, there is no Rungia exists, but it was only his thought and treatment of genera of Acanthaceae. We still prefer to treat it under Rungia only. Thanking you Yours sincerely On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, 16:56 J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Santhosh ji, > In

Re: [efloraofindia:388849] BRS 15062021

Thanks Hari Ji. Regards B. Rathinasabapathy Ecologist Pitchandikulam Forest Consultants On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, 4:55 pm Harikrishnan VR, wrote: > *Mollugo pentaphylla*, maybe. Molluginaceae > > *HARIKRISHNAN Venugopalan Radhamoni* > > > > > > > > *Everything will again be great and mighty The

Re: [efloraofindia:388848] A new subspecies of Rungia longifolia from Southern Western Ghats

Hi, Santhosh ji, In efi, we have moved all Rungia species to Justicia, e.g. as in CoL , based on JRI Wood 2014, Novon 23(3): 388 What to do with this

Re: [efloraofindia:388847] BRS 15062021

*Mollugo pentaphylla*, maybe. Molluginaceae *HARIKRISHNAN Venugopalan Radhamoni* *Everything will again be great and mighty The land simple and the water bountiful The trees gigantic and the walls very small And in the valleys strong and multiformed, A nation of shepherds and peasant

Re: [efloraofindia:388846] ID requested: Unid herb, dry deciduous forests, Mudumalai, Nilgiris, TN

Dear Gargji, I understand the difficulty. I was trying my luck if someone used to Southern Western Ghats is familiar with the leaves, and if possible guess the family and genus. Dear Karthickji, I thought about the same. The venation confuses me! Thanks again, Warm regards, Hari *HARIKRISHNAN

Re: [efloraofindia:388845] Olea europea

You are welcome. Regards, Seema Bin Zeenat M.sc Botany Department of Botany, School of Biosciences and Biotechnology. BGSB University, Rajouri- 185234, J, India On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, 4:23 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Seema ji. > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 4:05

Re: [efloraofindia:388844] Plant for ID: Kerala: 12th Jun 2021

Yes, *Clerodendrum paniculatum* L. as per images and details herein. On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 at 18:05, Mahadeswara wrote: > Looking at the shape of leaves and comparison with the images on the NET , > the ID

[efloraofindia:388844] Re: Confusion between Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare and Cerastium glomeratum

Garg ji Let us compare Indian taxa, best to start with FBI, which recognises 1. var. glomerata, now recognised as C. glomeratum, rightly so in Flora of India 2. var. trivialis which was recognised as C. fontanum subsp. triviale in Flora of India 3. var. grandiflora, now considered synonym of

Re: [efloraofindia:388842] Olea europea

Thanks, Seema ji. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 4:05 pm Seema Bin Zeenat, wrote: > Sir it was wild > > Regards, > Seema Bin Zeenat > M.sc Botany > Department of Botany, > School of Biosciences and Biotechnology. > BGSB University, Rajouri- 185234, J, India > > On Tue, Jun

Re: [efloraofindia:388839] Re: Photographs of Ixora grandifolia (Rubiaceae) shared

Thanks, Tapas ji, You may post I always check before incorporating in our site now. On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 04:49, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Garg ji, > Thank you for pointing this out. This means the photographer misidentified > his collections. I shall be more careful in future in sharing such

Re: [efloraofindia:388839] plant for ID

Any suggestions, Surajit ji? On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 22:48, surajitno...@gmail.com < surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please make sure *Agave americana* can grow wild in our country, because > as per Botany of Bihar and Orissa*, only *Agave vera-cruz was more or > less naturalized (in

Re: [efloraofindia:388838] ID requested: Unid herb, dry deciduous forests, Mudumalai, Nilgiris, TN

Could this be a *Plantago* sp.? On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:11 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Difficult to say in vegetative stage. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Hari Venu Radha > Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 22:04 > Subject: [efloraofindia:388167] ID requested: Unid herb, dry deciduous

Re: [efloraofindia:388835] Olea europea

Hi, Seema ji, Was it wild ? Is it the same as in your other post 'Olea feruginea' ? If wild, it may be Olea europea subsp. cuspidata as Olea europaea

[efloraofindia:388834] Re: Id Rhamnus species.

Not Rhamnus it's Sageretia thea (Rhamnaceae) or if following powo it should be called Sageretia brandrethiana Aitch. Actually there are several other species known from Western Himalaya including two recently described one's from Uttrakhand but it's not possible to distinguish them easily just

[efloraofindia:388833] Re: SK 2910 07 June 2021 - Orchidaceae

Thank you Dr. Kumar ! Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 2:59 PM Pankaj Kumar wrote: > Reminds me of a bit deformed Eria coronaria. > Thanks and regards > Pankaj > > On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 17:08, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Saroj ji, for the detailed images >>

[efloraofindia:388832] Re: SK 2910 07 June 2021 - Orchidaceae

Reminds me of a bit deformed Eria coronaria. Thanks and regards Pankaj On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 17:08, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Saroj ji, for the detailed images > . > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date:

Re: [efloraofindia:388830] I'd requested 1

Ok, will do that. Regards, Seema Bin Zeenat M.sc Botany Department of Botany, School of Biosciences and Biotechnology. BGSB University, Rajouri- 185234, J, India On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, 2:02 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Seema ji, > Once you have posted with a subject like 'I'd requested 1', pl. do

Re: [efloraofindia:388827] I'd requested 3

Hi, Seema ji, Once you have posted with a subject like 'I'd requested 1', pl. do not repeat the same subject. Move further to 'I'd requested 4', 'I'd requested 5', . 'I'd requested 99' 'I'd requested 188' and so on. Pl. re post again with unique subject, otherwise

Re: [efloraofindia:388827] I'd requested 2

Hi, Seema ji, Once you have posted with a subject like 'I'd requested 1', pl. do not repeat the same subject. Move further to 'I'd requested 4', 'I'd requested 5', . 'I'd requested 99' 'I'd requested 188' and so on. Pl. re post again with unique subject, otherwise

Re: [efloraofindia:388827] I'd requested 1

Hi, Seema ji, Once you have posted with a subject like 'I'd requested 1', pl. do not repeat the same subject. Move further to 'I'd requested 4', 'I'd requested 5', . 'I'd requested 99' 'I'd requested 188' and so on. Pl. re post again with unique subject, otherwise

Re: [efloraofindia:388819] Fwd: id request Lespedeza

FPSC

Re: [efloraofindia:388819] Fwd: id request Lespedeza

I am not sure if ID is correct, if yes there may be possibility . Lespedeza floribunda Bunge Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:39 PM Sunit Singh wrote: > thank you, sir. > but according to the flora of

Re: [efloraofindia:388818] Fwd: id request Lespedeza

thank you, sir. but according to the flora of Garhwal, *Lespedeza floribunda *not reported from the UK. *Thanks & Regards* Sunit Singh Chauhan Ph.D. Research Scholar Department of Botany HNB Central University Garhwal Uttarakhand. ORCID id:- https://orcid.org/-0003-1938-887X On Tue, Jun 15,

Re: [efloraofindia:388816] Jacobaea vulgaris

Hi, Sakhir ji, Do you have any more images showing other details or we close this thread for further discussions? On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 12:29, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 12:17 PM Gurcharan Singh > wrote: > >> Saroj ji, could you please give

Re: [efloraofindia:388815] Fwd: Asteraceae Week (Part I - Radiate heads) ::Wedelia sp??? at Andaman & Nicobar ::PKA60 ::

Thanks, Surajit ji. CoL and FoPI gives distribution of *Wedelia urticifolia*

Re: [efloraofindia:388814] Fwd: Id Rhamnus species.

Ok, I will wait. *Thanks & Regards* Sunit Singh Chauhan Ph.D. Research Scholar Department of Botany HNB Central University Garhwal Uttarakhand. ORCID id:- https://orcid.org/-0003-1938-887X On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:49 AM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > OK. Please wait for other opinions ! > Thank

Re: [efloraofindia:388813] Fwd: Combretum nanum @ Khargar Hills

Four are seen but maybe a fifth on the ar side which is not seen. Regards, Samir Mehta On Mon, Jun 14, 2021, 10:21 PM Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > How many wings are there in fruits, 4 or 5? > > On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 22:12 Sunit Singh, wrote: > >> It seems scandent shrub, might be C.

Re: [efloraofindia:388812] Fwd: Id Rhamnus species.

OK. Please wait for other opinions ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:00 PM Sunit Singh wrote: > yes sir it seems the same as per Herbarium specimen. > > http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:718558-1 > > still waiting for confirmation. > >

Re: [efloraofindia:388811] Fwd: Id Rhamnus species.

yes sir it seems the same as per Herbarium specimen. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:718558-1 still waiting for confirmation. *Thanks & Regards* Sunit Singh Chauhan Ph.D. Research Scholar Department of Botany HNB Central University Garhwal Uttarakhand. ORCID

Re: [efloraofindia:388810] Unknwon plants from Assam KD 01 Jun 2021

Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 11:27 am Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > Peristylus constrictus. > Thanks for sharing. > Pankaj > > On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 13:03, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for validation please. >> >> Some earlier relevant feedback: >>