Re: [efloraofindia:435262] Re: Ipomoea aquatica for validation

Thank you Garg ji. Warmcregards, Dr. B. Subramaniam On Sun, 23 Oct 2022, 18:36 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 4:38 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Yes, close to images at Ipomoea carnea subsp. fistulosa >>

Re: [efloraofindia:435261] Re: Ipomoea trifolia for validation

Thank you Garg ji. I will try to get side view image. Warm regards, Dr. B. Subramaniam On Sun, 23 Oct 2022, 18:36 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 4:32 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Side view would have helped. >> Maybe Ipomoea triloba >>

Re: [efloraofindia:435260] Re: I'd of Hibiscus from Bilaspur

Thank you Garg ji. Warm regards, Dr. B. Subramaniam On Sun, 23 Oct 2022, 18:37 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 4:15 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Yes, appears close to images at Hibiscus panduriformis >>

Re: [efloraofindia:435259] Re: Ipomoea hederacea fir validation

Thanks Garg ji and Radha ji. Warm regards, Dr. B. Subramaniam On Sun, 23 Oct 2022, 20:23 radha veach, wrote: > I also think it is more likely to be Ipomoea nil > Regards > Radha > > On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 4:50:22 AM UTC-6 JM Garg wrote: > >> I do not think so. >> I think close to

Re: [efloraofindia:435257] Epilobium parviflorum

I will try to get more photographs soon.. On Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 6:23 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me it appears to be from some other species. > Anyway, we will keep it as an Epilobium species only. > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 19:07, Shakir Ahmad > wrote: > >> >> On Sat, 22 Oct, 2022, 12:12 pm

Re: [efloraofindia:435257] Identification required 966

Matched... Thank you Garg sir On Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 4:13 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think close to images at Symphyotrichum subulatum (Introduced) > > > On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 at 19:18, Shakir Ahmad > wrote: > >> Location Ganderbal

[efloraofindia:435256] Re:Ipomoea aquatica for validation

Dear The creeper habit, growth floating on surface of water, by hollow stems or marshy banks and leaf morphology is reminiscent of Ipomoea aquatica. Ipomoea carina is plant with bushy, woody, shrub, stems not hollow but aquatic in habit. Carina is a alien aquatic weed while Ipomoea aquatica is

[efloraofindia:435255] Fwd: Inclusion of Alysicarpus gracilis Edgew.

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Dileep Pokle Date: Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 7:09 pm Subject: Re: Inclusion of Alysicarpus gracilis Edgew. To: J.M. Garg Also refer my book Genus Alysicarpus Desv. In lndia. On page 118 critical note 2. On Sun, 23 Oct 2022,

Re: [efloraofindia:435254] 378 ID wild plant Sonerila

OK Sam ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 7:27 PM Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Dear Garg ji, Saroj ji, > Yes, it is very close to Sonerila grandiflora, (having two differences: > lengthy peduncle and cylindrical stem) thank you very much for ID my plant, > with kind regards, Sam.

Re: [efloraofindia:435254] Re: Ipomoea hederacea fir validation

I also think it is more likely to be Ipomoea nil Regards Radha On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 4:50:22 AM UTC-6 JM Garg wrote: > I do not think so. > I think close to images at Ipomoea nil > > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 12:44, Saroj Kasaju

Re: [efloraofindia:435252] 378 ID wild plant Sonerila

Dear Garg ji, Saroj ji, Yes, it is very close to Sonerila grandiflora, (having two differences: lengthy peduncle and cylindrical stem) thank you very much for ID my plant, with kind regards, Sam. On Sun, 23 Oct 2022, 6:36 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Looks cloe Mr. Garg ! >

[efloraofindia:435250] Fwd: Inclusion of Alysicarpus gracilis Edgew.

Thanks a lot, Dileep ji -- Forwarded message - From: Dileep Pokle Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 19:03 Subject: Re: Inclusion of Alysicarpus gracilis Edgew. To: J.M. Garg Yes it is A.gautalensis as per A. K. Pandey. How ever in recently it iss treated as synonym of A.gracillis in my

Re: [efloraofindia:435248] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Ephedra for ID :: ARK2022-166

I also think close to images at Ephedra intermedia Pl. check differences at Ephedra intermedia vs Ephedra gerardiana On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 10:16, J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Alka ji,

Re: [efloraofindia:435245] 379 ID wild plant Rutaceae

Dear Garg ji, Mahadeswara ji, All Members, Thank you very much for ID my plant, with kind regards, Sam. On Sun, 23 Oct 2022, 6:55 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Mahadeswara ji, for the id. > Yes, appears close to images at *Zanthoxylum ovalifolium* Wight >

Re: [efloraofindia:435245] Identification request 9

Thanks a lot Garg ji  On Sun, Oct 23, 2022, 18:46 J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it is close to the images at *Pulicaria foliolosa* Buch.-Ham. ex > DC. > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 22:12, Sonu Kumar wrote: > >> Sir I have some pictures

Re: [efloraofindia:435245] 379 ID wild plant Rutaceae

Yes it is Zanthoxylum ovalifolium, dear Mahadeswara ji, (it had thorny stem, but not in leaves) thank you very much for ID my plant, with kind regards, Sam. On Sun, 23 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 5:32 pm Mahadeswara,

Re: [efloraofindia:435244] 379 ID wild plant Rutaceae

Thanks, Mahadeswara ji, for the id. Yes, appears close to images at *Zanthoxylum ovalifolium* Wight On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 18:00, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 5:32 pm Mahadeswara,

Re: [efloraofindia:435241] Names of Plants in India :: Euphorbia concanensis Janarth. & S.R.Yadav

Thanks, Dinesh ji On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 18:20, Dinesh Valke wrote: > *Euphorbia concanensis* Janarth. & S.R.Yadav > [image: Euphorbia concanensis Janarth. & S.R.Yadav] > > *yoo-FOR-bee-uh* -- named for *Euphorbus*, Greek physician to Juba II, > King of Mauretania ... Dave's Botanary >

[efloraofindia:435241] Re: IDENTIFICATION OF FLOWER

Thanks, Tabish ji. I think it may be *Koelreuteria bipinnata* Franch. (pinnate leaves), as per images and details herein. But leaves are required for its confirmation. Leaves are unipinnate in *Koelreuteria

Re: [efloraofindia:435241] Identification request 9

I think it is close to the images at *Pulicaria foliolosa* Buch.-Ham. ex DC. On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 22:12, Sonu Kumar wrote: > Sir I have some pictures sent by my friend. > With regards  > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022, 12:12 J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:435238] Re: I'd of Hibiscus from Bilaspur

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 4:15 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, appears close to images at Hibiscus panduriformis > > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 07:51, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Hibiscus panduriformis Burm.

Re: [efloraofindia:435237] Re: Ipomoea trifolia for validation

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 4:32 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Side view would have helped. > Maybe Ipomoea triloba > > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 14:25, Bala Subramaniam < > balasubramaniam1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [efloraofindia:435238] Re: Ipomoea aquatica for validation

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 4:38 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, close to images at Ipomoea carnea subsp. fistulosa > > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 14:22, Bala Subramaniam < > balasubramaniam1...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [efloraofindia:435237] 378 ID wild plant Sonerila

Looks cloe Mr. Garg ! https://efloraofindia.com/2016/10/28/sonerila-grandiflora/ Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 5:24 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > And also check S.nemakadensis specimen >

Re: [efloraofindia:435236] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Physochlaina praealta :: ARK2022-168

Yes, as per images at Physochlaina praealta On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 20:56, Alka Khare wrote: > Hello friends > > Physochlaina praealta > > This was on the banks of the Pangong tso. > > Thanks and regards > Alka Khare > > -- > You

Re: [efloraofindia:435235] Epilobium parviflorum

To me it appears to be from some other species. Anyway, we will keep it as an Epilobium species only. On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 19:07, Shakir Ahmad wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Oct, 2022, 12:12 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Do you have any habit image? >> >> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 11:49, J.M. Garg wrote:

[efloraofindia:435233] Names of Plants in India :: Euphorbia concanensis Janarth. & S.R.Yadav

*Euphorbia concanensis* Janarth. & S.R.Yadav [image: Euphorbia concanensis Janarth. & S.R.Yadav] *yoo-FOR-bee-uh* -- named for *Euphorbus*, Greek physician to Juba II, King of Mauretania ... Dave's Botanary ¿

Fwd: [efloraofindia:435233] Re: Swamy/New series/ID/88

-- Forwarded message - From: M Swamy Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 18:15 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:434685] Re: Swamy/New series/ID/88 To: J.M. Garg By mistake I sent these photographs of Stevia. Kindly ignore. Sorry for the posting. On Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 17:59 J.M. Garg, wrote:

Re: [efloraofindia:435231] 379 ID wild plant Rutaceae

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 5:32 pm Mahadeswara, wrote: > A suggestion : Zanthoxylum ovalifolium ( > http://keralaplants.in/keralaplantsdetails.aspx?id=Zanthoxylum_ovalifolium > ) . Not sure. > > On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 7:24:26 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Pl.

Re: [efloraofindia:435231] 379 ID wild plant Rutaceae

A suggestion : Zanthoxylum ovalifolium ( http://keralaplants.in/keralaplantsdetails.aspx?id=Zanthoxylum_ovalifolium ) . Not sure. On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 7:24:26 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Pl. check > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/02/rutaceae/ > -- > With regards, > J. M.

Re: [efloraofindia:435229] 378 ID wild plant Sonerila

And also check S.nemakadensis specimen . On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 16:56, J.M. Garg wrote: > Also check an S.zeylanica specimen >

Re: [efloraofindia:435228] 378 ID wild plant Sonerila

Also check an S.zeylanica specimen . On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 16:52, J.M. Garg wrote: > I tried with listed species in Flora of

Re: [efloraofindia:435227] 378 ID wild plant Sonerila

I tried with listed species in Flora of Peninsular India, with distribution in the area. But could not find any match. It comes somewhat close to *Sonerila grandiflora* , but not convinced. On Sat, 22 Oct

Re: [efloraofindia:435226] Re: Ipomoea aquatica for validation

Yes, close to images at Ipomoea carnea subsp. fistulosa On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 14:22, Bala Subramaniam < balasubramaniam1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you very much Saroj ji. > Warm regards, > Dr. B. Subramaniam > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022,

Re: [efloraofindia:435225] Re: Ipomoea hederacea fir validation

I do not think so. I think close to images at Ipomoea nil On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 12:44, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > I guess the ID is correct ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 10:11 AM Bala Subramaniam < >

Re: [efloraofindia:435224] Re: Ipomoea trifolia for validation

Side view would have helped. Maybe Ipomoea triloba On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 14:25, Bala Subramaniam < balasubramaniam1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes Saroj ji, thanks a lot for validating. > Warm regards, > Dr. B. Subramaniam > > On Sat, 22 Oct

Re: [efloraofindia:435223] Identification required 966

I think close to images at Symphyotrichum subulatum (Introduced) On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 at 19:18, Shakir Ahmad wrote: > Location Ganderbal Kashmir India. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [efloraofindia:435221] Re: I'd of Hibiscus from Bilaspur

Yes, appears close to images at Hibiscus panduriformis On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 07:51, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Hibiscus panduriformis Burm. fil. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 7:58 am, Bala Subramaniam < >

Re: [efloraofindia:435220] Small Tree for ID, Chittoor, AP

recently POWO site has been revised, now many plant names got the first/earliest name as valid, hence several changes in plant names. that is why synonyms are given. thank you On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 2:07 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, POWO >

Re: [efloraofindia:435219] Small Tree for ID, Chittoor, AP

Yes, POWO also follows the same. On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 13:49, nadeem waqif wrote: > According to some sources, the accepted name of the species is Litsea > ligustrina. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litsea_ligustrina > >

Re: [efloraofindia:435218] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Clematis for ID :: ARK2022-165

Pl. see the detailed descriptions from BSI Flora of India: *Clematis ladakhiana * Grey-Wilson *Clematis orientalis * L. *Shrubs, climbing or straggling;*

Re: [efloraofindia:435217] Small Tree for ID, Chittoor, AP

According to some sources, the accepted name of the species is Litsea ligustrina. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litsea_ligustrina http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0001070722 What is the opinion of the experts in this group? On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 13:37, J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes,

Re: [efloraofindia:435216] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Yellow Asteraceae-2 for ID :: ARK2022-164

Id is correct. Pl. see images at GBIF and iNaturalist . I also found this species initially confusing. On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 07:21, J.M. Garg wrote: > I also struggled in the

Re: [efloraofindia:435215] Small Tree for ID, Chittoor, AP

Yes, appears close to images at Litsea deccanensis On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 21:53, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Lalithamba ji and Paradesi ji > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Wed, 19 Oct, 2022, 2:21 pm Lalithamba Avadhanam, >

Re: [efloraofindia:435214] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Nepeta floccosa :: ARK2022-167

Yes, appears close to images at Nepeta floccosa On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 20:54, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Yes Alka Ji ! > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/KPwmsunQ03o > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022

Re: [efloraofindia:435213] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Yellow Asteraceae-1 for ID :: ARK2022-163

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 1:23 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Both are the same. Pl. see images at GBIF > and > iNaturalist . > I also found this

Re: [efloraofindia:435212] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Yellow Asteraceae-1 for ID :: ARK2022-163

Both are the same. Pl. see images at GBIF and iNaturalist . I also found this species initially confusing. On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 20:35, Alka Khare wrote: > Thank you Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:435210] Re: Is it Rubia wallichiana

Thanks, Taffazull ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 10:58 am taffa...@gmail.com, wrote: > Am posting another photo of red roots and orange buds characteristic of > this plant in autumn. In spring the buds will elongate very rapidly and > the climbing stems completely

[efloraofindia:435210] Fwd: [itpmods:17585] Fwd: Meeting with Prashant Awale

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: D.S Rawat Date: Sun, 23 Oct, 2022, 11:09 am Subject: Re: [itpmods:17585] Fwd: Meeting with Prashant Awale To: itpmods Congratulations Prashant ji for successfully completing EBC track. Hope some interesting plants will