[efloraofindia:465473] Re: SK 3956 11 May 2024

May be some Actinodaphne species. On Mon, 27 May 2024, 12:57 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Appears to be from Lauraceae. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 at 20:07 > Subject: SK 3956 11 May 2024 > To: efloraindia , J.M. Garg < > jmga...@gmail.com> >

[efloraofindia:465309] Re: Breynia vitis-idaea (Burm.f.) C.E.C.Fisch.

Okay Saroj ji. On Tue, 21 May 2024, 14:38 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 2:53 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 2:53 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj

[efloraofindia:464964] Re: Albizia julibrissin Durazz.

Wonderful photography! On Sat, 11 May 2024, 15:21 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 3:35 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 3:35 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you. >>>

[efloraofindia:464905] Re: Glochidion nubigenum Hook.f.

Excellent photography! On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 6:39 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 6:54 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 6:53 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>>

Re: [efloraofindia:464306] Fwd: Phyllanthaceae: Phyllanthus reticulata

Thank you Saroj ji. Regards, Tapas On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, 14:00 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Now : *Kirganelia reticulata *(Poir.) Baill. > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:07 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Mandru ji >> -- >> With regards, >> J. M. Garg >> >> --

[efloraofindia:463968] Re: SK 3837 12 August 2023

>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 9:07 PM Saroj Kasaju >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Saroj Kasaju &

Re: [efloraofindia:463929] Plant identification from Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary

Oh yes. You are right Garg ji. On Sat, 6 Apr 2024, 12:32 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me it appears close to images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/12/litsea-glutinosa/ > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 at 19:14, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> Some earlier

[efloraofindia:463846] Re: SK576 18 JUN-2017:ID

Yes, Macaranga pustulata. On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, 15:27 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Hi, Tapas ji, > Can it also be *Macaranga pustulata*? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 at 19:04 > Subject: SK576 18 JUN-2017:ID > To: efloraofindia , J.M. Garg < >

[efloraofindia:463845] Re: Macaranga denticulata (Blume) Müll.Arg.

Macaranga pustulata. On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, 15:18 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji, > But we can not see the fruit character here. > So what do you finally consider it to be ? > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 14:55, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > >> Fruit character is distinctive

[efloraofindia:463839] Re: Macaranga denticulata (Blume) Müll.Arg.

Fruit character is distinctive between the two species. On Wed, Apr 3, 2024, 12:48 J.M. Garg wrote: > So you mean to say that it is M. pustulata as there are black dots on leaf > lamina near the junction of petiole. > Is it? > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 19:07, Tapas Chakr

[efloraofindia:463512] Re: Macaranga denticulata (Blume) Müll.Arg.

Macaranga pustulata On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, 20:37 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > What about this Tapas Da ? > https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/Z5ZJscbQ7S4/m/Q_IA_9_DBAAJ > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 9:16 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> >> >> *Dear

[efloraofindia:463508] Re: Macaranga denticulata (Blume) Müll.Arg.

Please look here: glandular patches in M. pustulata. Moreover, there will be black dots on leaf lamina near the junction of petiole. On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, 18:59 Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > Good question Garg ji. > Here in case of Macaranga pustulata, there are conspicuous glandular >

[efloraofindia:463506] Re: Macaranga denticulata (Blume) Müll.Arg.

> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 14:12, Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> Is this not Macaranga pustulata? >> >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, 13:50 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >&

[efloraofindia:463267] Re: Macaranga denticulata (Blume) Müll.Arg.

Is this not Macaranga pustulata? On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, 13:50 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:02 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:01 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> Dear

[efloraofindia:462908] Re: SK 3935 10 March 2024

May be same species. On Sun, 10 Mar 2024, 23:17 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Are they both the same sp. ? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 11:18 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> Actinodaphne species. >> >> On Sun

[efloraofindia:462904] Re: SK 3935 10 March 2024

Actinodaphne species. On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:38 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:52 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:52 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you. >>>

[efloraofindia:462904] Re: SK 3936 10 March 2024 - Lauraceae

Here the terminal buds are sparsely puberulous. Hence this plant cannot be *Actinodaphne reticulata. *I am sticking to my earlier observation that this plant is something close to *A. longipes *Kosterm. but without any flowers or fruits it is really difficult to confirm the identity. With regards,

[efloraofindia:462328] Re: [itpmods:18217] Re: Posted in 2021, published as a new species in 2024

Congratulations On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, 13:00 Dinesh Valke, wrote: > Many thanks, Garg ji. > Nice feeling, Sawmliana ji !! > Hearty congratulations dear Pankaj, Khyanjeet ji, and team. > > Regards. > Dinesh > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, 12:15 Sam Kuzhalanattu, > wrote: > >> Congratulations to all for

Re: [efloraofindia:462168] Lauraceae for ID Persea ?? AT MAR 2017/16

0 > https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=7469276 > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Anil Thakur > Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 at 21:41 > Subject: [efloraofindia:265306] Lauraceae for ID Persea ?? AT MAR 2017/16 > To: efloraofindia > Cc: Tapas Chakrabarty

[efloraofindia:461980] Re: Actinodaphnae lanceolata....?

The photograph is insufficient for arriving at conclusion. With regards, Tapas On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, 14:47 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > Difficult for me to say after checking at > >

[efloraofindia:461786] Re: Phyllanthaceae: Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A.Juss.

Glochidion hohenackeri. On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 11:29 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me looks different from images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/02/glochidion-zeylanicum/ > Can it be > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/02/glochidion-ellipticum/? > > -- Forwarded message - > From:

[efloraofindia:461785] Re: Phyllanthaceae: Phyllanthus polyphyllus B.Heyne ex Wall.

Emblica racemosa, previously Phyllanthus racemosus. On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 11:44 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me appears closer to *Phyllanthus racemosus *L.f. (syn. *Phyllanthus > polyphyllus *Willd.): > https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:354558-1 >

[efloraofindia:461741] Re: Phyllanthaceae: Bridelia montana Willd.

Bridelia retusa. On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 17:51 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me appears more closer to images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/11/bridelia-retusa/ > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 10:59 > Subject: Fwd: Phyllanthaceae: Bridelia

Re: [efloraofindia:460953] 524 ID wild tree

*Drypetes venusta*, a common element in evergreen foests between 500 - 1500 m asl. On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 4:40 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Viplav ji, for the id. > Yes appears close to images of Drypetes venusta as per > https://indiabiodiversity.org/species/show/11096 >

[efloraofindia:460356] Re: Regarding identification of the Sp Collected from Ganjam Odisha on Jan 2024

Agreed Garg ji. On Thu, 11 Jan 2024, 13:41 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Can it be > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/15/cleistanthus-collinus/? > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 13:32, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Can it be some *Phyllanthus* species? >> >> -- Forwarded message - >> From: J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:460126] Identification request?

Thank you Garg ji. May be yes. Regards, Tapas On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, 17:45 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji. > I can see such long pedicels at some observations at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/01/actephila-excelsa/ > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 17:40, Tapas Chakrabarty wro

Re: [efloraofindia:460123] Identification request?

I need to see the staminate flowers for confirmation. Yes, either Actephila or Cleidion are my choices for the generic name, more likely to be Actephila, though never seen such slender and elongated fruiting pedicels. Regards, Tapas On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, 16:45 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again

Re: [efloraofindia:460057] 516 ID wild tree

Dear Garg ji, Thank you for showing me beautiful images of Actinodaphne bourdillonii. With regards, Tapas On Wed, Jan 3, 2024, 15:27 J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Viplav ji and Saroj ji, for the id. > Yes appears close to *Actinodaphne bourdillonii* as per Biotik >

[efloraofindia:459956] Re: SK 3837 12 August 2023

8351123/media/32d9237bd3eac708108f781525644bfc>). >>>> Alos see >>>> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:465764-1 >>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2_id=242423946 >>>> >>>> On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 at 22:27, Saroj Kasaj

[efloraofindia:459623] Re: SK 3837 12 August 2023

Garg. According to book its distribution is in >>>>>>>>>>> Eastern Nepal only, not in Central Nepal. >>>>>>>>>>> Please have a look at : >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t=j==s=web==2ahUKEw

[efloraofindia:459271] Re: SK 3904 01 December 2023

/n/351317-1 > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 1:09 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> Dear Saroj ji, >> This is a wrong concept advanced by me. If you go through the book Gen. >> Macaranga Prodr. by T. C. Whitmore (2008) he has shown that these

[efloraofindia:459263] Re: SK 3904 01 December 2023

; ex Hook.f.) Chakrab. & M.Gangop. ?? > Any article / journal on update on this sp. ?? > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:33 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, Tapas ji >> >> On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 00:34, Tapas Chakrabarty >> wrote: >&g

[efloraofindia:459211] Re: SK 3904 01 December 2023

Macaranga denticulata and M. pustulata are entirely different species based on fruit characters according to Whitmore, Gen. Macaranga Prodr. (2008) and both the species are occurring in India. On Sun, 10 Dec 2023, 10:53 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks a lot, Viplav ji. > It should be *Macaranga

[efloraofindia:458996] Re: SK 3898 23 November 2023

Wow! I am delighted seeing field images of the very rare Combretum wallichii for the first time. On Mon, 4 Dec 2023, 15:19 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Tapas ji can confirm or otherwise. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 11:57 > Subject: SK 3898

[efloraofindia:458952] Re: Lindera neesiana (Wall. ex Nees) Kurz

Beautiful images. On Sun, 3 Dec 2023, 14:51 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 3:05 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 3:05 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj

[efloraofindia:458713] Re: Drypetes for identification-13

This species is exceedingly variable. On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, 13:35 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji. > I find that leaves are a bit toothed here, which I do not see at > https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3075923 > Is it OK ? > > > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 20:

[efloraofindia:458679] Re: Lindera neesiana (Wall. ex Nees) Kurz

Wonderful photography. On Sun, 26 Nov 2023, 14:18 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Nepali Names : सिल टिमुर Sil Timur / ठेकी फूल Thekee Phool > > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 2:28 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> Dear Members, >> >> Location: Phulchoki, Kathmandu >> Date: 20

[efloraofindia:458187] Re: Drypetes for identification-13

Drypetes indica. On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, 16:10 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Dipoo Dipankar Borah > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 15:20 > Subject: Drypetes for identification-13 > To: efloraofindia , J.M. Garg < >

Re: [efloraofindia:458088] MS, Oct., 2023/03 Celtis sp.? for id

I agree with you. This is a common Lauraceae member in Northeast India. On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, 15:56 J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think Saroj ji is right in its id as > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/12/lindera-pulcherrima/ > > -- Forwarded message - > From: M Sawmliana > Date: Fri,

[efloraofindia:456907] Re: Regarding identification of the sp. collected from Ganjam Odisha during June 2023

Beilschmiedia roxburghiana! Flowering material desirable. On Tue, 17 Oct 2023, 17:40 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Appears to be from Lauraceae. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Kumar Prabhat Das > Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 17:04 > Subject: Regarding identification of the sp. collected

[efloraofindia:456199] Re: Cathetus clarkei (Hook.f.) R.W.Bouman

Dear Saroj ji, Even nomenclature is also up to date. Regards, Tapas On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, 14:44 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you Tapas Da . Hope ID is correct ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 2:58 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> Thank you Saro

[efloraofindia:456196] Re: Cathetus clarkei (Hook.f.) R.W.Bouman

Thank you Saroj ji, For the beautiful images. With regards, Tapas On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, 14:41 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 2:55 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 2:55 PM Saroj Kasaju

[efloraofindia:455802] Re: Kirganelia glauca (Wall. ex Müll.Arg.) R.W.Bouman

Excellent photography! On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:02 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:17 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> Dear Members, >> >> Location: Surya Binayak, Bhaktapur, Nepal >> Altitude: 1500m. >> Date: 28 August 2023 >> Habit :

[efloraofindia:454174] Re: Regarding identification of the sp. collected from Ganjam Odisha on the month of Des 2022

-Ditto- On Fri, 1 Sep 2023, 17:21 J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think it appears close to images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/03/tragia-involucrata/ > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 16:03 > Subject: Re: Regarding identification of the

[efloraofindia:453196] Re: SK 3837 12 August 2023

for as many field photographs of Lauraceae as possible. With regards, Tapas Chakrabarty. On Sat, 12 Aug 2023, 22:27 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you Tapas Da ! > > According to the latest checklist, following sp. matches to the elevation. > L. cubeba, L. doshia, L. elongata,

[efloraofindia:453191] Re: SK 3837 12 August 2023

Dear Saroj ji, I do not yet know the name of this Litsea. I need some time. Regards, Tapas On Sat, Aug 12, 2023, 17:34 Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 5:48 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Sat, Aug

[efloraofindia:452926] Re: Kirganelia glauca (Wall. ex Müll.Arg.) R.W.Bouman

Thank you Saroj ji, for showing us this plant. Regards, Tapas On Mon, 7 Aug 2023, 20:17 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 8:26 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 8:26 PM Saroj Kasaju >>

[efloraofindia:451964] Re: Regarding identification of the species collected from Mayurbhanja Odisha

This is a new record for Odisha. On Wed, 26 Jul 2023, 15:05 Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > Glochilion multiloculare. > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2023, 13:33 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> Some earlier relevant feedback: >> Phyll

[efloraofindia:451963] Re: Regarding identification of the species collected from Mayurbhanja Odisha

Glochilion multiloculare. On Wed, 26 Jul 2023, 13:33 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > Phyllanthus species > I could see tepals and disc of female flower > Need to check new classification > --- > Raja > *Glochidion velutinum

[efloraofindia:451153] Re: SK 3786 09 July 2023

I take this as *Euphorbia donii*, which is, however shown to be a synonym of *E. pseudosikkimensis *here: https://powo.science.kew.org/results?q=Euphorbia%20donii Regards, Tapas On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 5:36 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at

Re: [efloraofindia:450355] identify this persea tree species

If the inflorescences are glabrous, the yes, Machilus odoratissima. Regards, Tapas On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, 16:36 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Yes, id suggested by Saroj ji, appears close as per images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2012/12/31/persea-odoratissima/ > > -- Forwarded message -

Re: [efloraofindia:449694] MS, June, 2023/02 Croton sp. for id

Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 13:41 >>>> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:448155] MS, June, 2023/02 Croton sp. for id >>>> To: J.M. Garg >>>> >>>> >>>> Croton lissophyllus ? >>>> >>>> On Sun, 11 Jun, 2023, 5:29 pm J.M. Ga

Re: [efloraofindia:449680] MS, June, 2023/02 Croton sp. for id

> From: M Sawmliana > Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 13:41 > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:448155] MS, June, 2023/02 Croton sp. for id > To: J.M. Garg > > > Croton lissophyllus ? > > On Sun, 11 Jun, 2023, 5:29 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, Tapas ji >>

[efloraofindia:449434] Re: Regarding identification of the species collected from Nagaland

Dear Garg ji, At present I do not have any knowledge on Litsea. Regards, Tapas On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, 16:20 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Hi, Tapas ji, > Can it be Litsea hookeri ?: > https://efloraofindia.com/2017/10/17/litsea-hookeri/ > Or is it something else? > > -- Forwarded message -

Re: [efloraofindia:449402] MS, June, 2023/08 Actinodaphne sp. ? for id.

Phoebe attenuata. Verified by Facebook. On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, 12:48 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Sawmliana ji, for id as Phoebe attenuata. > To me also, it appears close to the GBIF > specimen >

[efloraofindia:449324] Re: SK 3747 16 June 2023

The fruits will grow up to 2-3 cm in diameter and should be edible like other species. On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, 15:07 Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Tapas DA! How big will be the fruits? Edible? > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:20 PM Tapas Chakrabarty &

[efloraofindia:449321] Re: SK 3747 16 June 2023

f.) Kosterm. > Nepali Name : सेतो काउलो Seto Kaaulo > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:07 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> Dear Saroj ji, >> >> Thank you for the wonderful photographers of Machilus clarkeana. >> >> With best regar

[efloraofindia:449315] Re: SK 3747 16 June 2023

Dear Saroj ji, Thank you for the wonderful photographers of Machilus clarkeana. With best regards, Tapas On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, 14:40 Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 2:54 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:449190] Bush for ID Tiruvannamalei, Tamil Nadu NAW-OCT-17

Suregada lanceolata. On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, 12:03 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji. > What to finally take it as ? > > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 23:04, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > >> It may be noted that the genus *Suregada *Roxb. ex Rottler exhibits >> extra-ordin

[efloraofindia:449172] Re: SK 3741 14 June 2023

If the leaves and inflorescences are glabrous, then you can think of Machilus odoratissima. On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 22:33 Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:48 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Wed, Jun

Re: [efloraofindia:448487] Euphorbiaceae Fortnight : Suregada lanceolata, (Willd.) Kuntze <=> Suregada Tree

Suregada lanceolata. On Wed, 7 Jun 2023, 10:50 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji. > What do you think the posted species can be? > > > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 23:04, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > >> It may be noted that the genus *Suregada *Roxb. ex Rottler ex

Re: [efloraofindia:448469] Suregada angustifolia(Baill ex Muell - Arg) Airyshaw

It may be noted that the genus *Suregada *Roxb. ex Rottler exhibits extra-ordinary phenological plasticity. Each species seems to be connected to some other species with endless intermediated. Hence, species delimitations in the genus are based on some tendencies exhibited by the taxa rather than

Re: [efloraofindia:448468] Euphorbiaceae Fortnight : Suregada lanceolata, (Willd.) Kuntze <=> Suregada Tree

It may be noted that the genus *Suregada *Roxb. ex Rottler exhibits extra-ordinary phenological plasticity. Each species seems to be connected to some other species with endless intermediated. Hence, species delimitations in the genus are based on some tendencies exhibited by the taxa rather than

Re: [efloraofindia:448467] Bush for ID Tiruvannamalei, Tamil Nadu NAW-OCT-17

It may be noted that the genus *Suregada *Roxb. ex Rottler exhibits extra-ordinary phenological plasticity. Each species seems to be connected to some other species with endless intermediated. Hence, species delimitations in the genus are based on some tendencies exhibited by the taxa rather than

[efloraofindia:448295] Re: Regarding identification of the species collected from Nagaland

Litsea. On Sat, 3 Jun 2023, 15:50 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Prabhat ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Kumar Prabhat Das > Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 at 15:19 > Subject: Regarding identification of the species collected from Nagaland > To: J.M. Garg > > > > > -- > With

[efloraofindia:447010] Re: SK 3725 07 May 2023

Triadica cochinchinensis! On Fri, May 12, 2023, 17:26 J.M. Garg wrote: > Can it be from euphorbiaceae? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 at 13:05 > Subject: SK 3725 07 May 2023 > To: efloraindia , J.M. Garg < > jmga...@gmail.com> > > > > >

Re: [efloraofindia:446525] SCHEFFLERA TREE MAYBE. ID.....8th NOV 2011........S.S.... 063

I agree Garg ji but flowering or fruiting twigs are required for confirmation. Regards, Tapas On Mon, 1 May 2023, 13:35 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Dear Sir, > > > https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/l/lauraceae/actinodaphne/actinodaphne-species-1/jaldapara > For the above link

Re: [efloraofindia:446179] Request ID Phyllantus sp. ?

Breynia androgyny. On Sat, 22 Apr 2023, 16:54 J.M. Garg, wrote: > The colour of calyx and fruit were bothering me as they look different > from images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/28/sauropus-androgynus/ > But it should be OK. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Germain

Re: [efloraofindia:446067] Re: SK 3716 08 April 2023

/l/lauraceae/machilus/machilus-duthiei> > ? > > On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 22:37, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > >> *Machilus odoratissima *Nees. >> >> On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:34 PM Tapas Chakrabarty >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Saroj ji, >>> >>>

[efloraofindia:445760] Re: Terminallia chebula

Commercial Chebulic myrobalan comprises two species, Terminalia chebula (first line) and T. citrina (second line). Regards, Tapas On Thu, 13 Apr 2023, 16:19 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks a lot, Kiratsinh ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Kiratsinh Zala > Date: Thu, 13 Apr

[efloraofindia:445611] Re: Lindera pulcherrima (Nees) Benth.

Good photography. On Sun, 9 Apr 2023, 15:07 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 3:17 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> >> *Dear Members,Location: Chandragiri, Kathmandu, NepalAltitude: 2264m.Date >> : 8 April 2023Habitat : Wild* >> >> Thank you. >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:445547] Re: SK 3716 08 April 2023

*Machilus odoratissima *Nees. On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:34 PM Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Hi Saroj ji, > > *Machilus *again, if not *Phoebe *(distinguishable by fruits only). I > will check the species. > > Regards, > Tapas > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at

Re: [efloraofindia:445524] Re: SK 3716 08 April 2023

Hi Saroj ji, *Machilus *again, if not *Phoebe *(distinguishable by fruits only). I will check the species. Regards, Tapas On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:24 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Very close to Persea macrantha Saroj Ji. > > On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 21:19, Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:445425] MS, April, 2023/10 Tree for id

Yes, *Lindera pulcherrima.* On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 3:20 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > To me appears close to images of Lindera pulcherrima as at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/12/lindera-pulcherrima/ > Pl. confirm or otherwise. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: M Sawmliana >

[efloraofindia:445173] Re: SK 3714 April 2023

t; From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Sun, 2 Apr, 2023, 15:12 > Subject: Re: SK 3714 April 2023 > To: efloraindia , J.M. Garg < > jmga...@gmail.com>, Tapas Chakrabarty > > > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 3:26 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote:

[efloraofindia:444819] Re: SK 3709 21 March 2023

loser to images at >>>> https://efloraofindia.com/2012/05/03/machilus-duthiei/ >>>> (lateral nerves are also in the range of 14 or so) >>>> >>>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 13:46, Saroj Kasaju >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>&g

[efloraofindia:444722] Re: SK 3709 21 March 2023

This may be even a new species! On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, 13:40 Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > Machilus duthiei has 14-20 pairs of lateral nerves of leaves, which it is > not. > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, 00:35 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > >> Dear Tapas Da, >> >> I could n

[efloraofindia:444721] Re: SK 3709 21 March 2023

om/species/a---l/l/lauraceae/machilus/machilus-duthiei > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, Tapas ji >> -- >> With regards, >> J. M. Garg >> >> On Mon, 27 Mar, 2023, 20:23

[efloraofindia:444634] Re: SK 3708 21 March 2023

Please compare with *Machilus gamblei *King ex Hook.f. Regards, Tapas On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 8:49 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 17:17, Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> I also think it to be a Machilus. I will try to identify the spec

[efloraofindia:444633] Re: SK 3709 21 March 2023

I think this is *Machilus edulis *King ex Hook.f. Regards, Tapas On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 8:49 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 17:15, Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> I will check. >> >> On Sun, 26 Mar 2023, 16:50 J.M. Garg,

[efloraofindia:444588] Re: SK 3708 21 March 2023

I also think it to be a Machilus. I will try to identify the species. On Sun, 26 Mar 2023, 16:24 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Can it be some Machilus species as per > https://efloraofindia.com/2012/05/03/machilus/? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at

[efloraofindia:444588] Re: SK 3709 21 March 2023

I will check. On Sun, 26 Mar 2023, 16:50 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me appears close to images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2012/05/03/machilus-duthiei/ > Pl. check. > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 17:28, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> May be from lauraceae. >> >> -- Forwarded message - >>

[efloraofindia:444298] Re: SK 3703 15 March 2023

looks > different to me. > *Actinodaphne reticulata* Meisn. has been reported in the Checklist of > Nepal. > > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 17:35, Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> I beg to differ. I think the samples posted by Saroj ji should belong to >> Actinodap

[efloraofindia:444288] Re: SK 3703 15 March 2023

>>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:18 PM Saroj Kasaju >>> wrote: >>> >>>> OK Tapas Da! >>>> I am not Da but a junior! >>>> Thank you. >>&

[efloraofindia:444103] Re: SK 3703 15 March 2023

in > many localities in the valley and particularly. Phulchoki ! > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:46 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> The whorled leaves and the terminal perulate buds indeed point to >> Actinodaphne. Ho

[efloraofindia:444091] Re: SK 3703 15 March 2023

> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 13:48 >> Subject: SK 3703 15 March 2023 >> To: efloraindia , J.M. Garg < >> jmga...@gmail.com>, Tapas Chakrabarty >> >> >> >> *Dear Members,Location: Kathmandu Valley, NepalDate: 11 March >> 2023Altitude: 2418m.Habitat

[efloraofindia:444087] Re: Tritaxis kurnoolensis (Dimorphocalyx kurnoolensis R.R.V.Raju & Pull. )

Happy to see this rare endemic. Tapas On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, 12:17 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks a lot, Kusom ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Swamy Kusom > Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 12:07 > Subject: Tritaxis kurnoolensis (Dimorphocalyx kurnoolensis R.R.V.Raju & > Pull. ) > To:

[efloraofindia:444079] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

; >> *Euonymus lucidus *D.Don syn : *Euonymus pendulus *Wall. >> >> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 01:28, Tapas Chakrabarty >> wrote: >> >>> Should be Cryptocarya, possibly C. amygdalina. >>> >>> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 14:59 J.M. Garg, wrote: >>> &

[efloraofindia:444064] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Should be Cryptocarya, possibly C. amygdalina. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 14:59 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > Seems to be Xylosma sp.- from Prabhat ji > *Xylosma controversa *Clos ?? But leaf margin serration looks different. >

[efloraofindia:443523] Re: Regarding identification of tree species from Baragargh Odisha date of collection 28 February 2k23

Yes, Glochidion zeylanicum. On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, 13:00 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Saroj ji. > Yes, appears close to images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/02/glochidion-zeylanicum/ > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 13:21 > Subject:

Re: [efloraofindia:443386] Requesting a shrub id_03032023_2

Okay Garg ji. On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, 14:51 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me it appears close to images at *Baliospermum solanifolium* (Burm.) > Suresh > > Both images are from the same species. > > --

[efloraofindia:442728] Re: Regarding the sp. identification

I think yes. On Sun, Feb 26, 2023, 22:14 J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. check with images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2012/05/27/persea-macrantha/ > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 12:22 > Subject: Fwd: Regarding the sp. identification > To:

Re: [efloraofindia:442689] Lauraceae?

sList_PCL.action?resultType=genusWise_Id=29049_Name=lindera>, >> but could not reach any id. >> >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 21:05, Tapas Chakrabarty >> wrote: >> >>> Any further comment with these images devoid of flowers and fruits is >>> not possible

Re: [efloraofindia:442509] Lauraceae?

>> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:25 AM J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Thanks a lot, Tapas ji. >>> Great help. >>> Seems correct as per images and references at >>> https://efloraofindia.com/2018/12/09/lindera-neesiana/ >>> >>> On Thu,

Re: [efloraofindia:442469] Lauraceae?

The sterile images are of Cinnamomum while the images bearing fruits belong to Lindera neesiana (Lauraceae). Regards, Tapas On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, 16:24 J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think non fruiting one appears different from images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2014/04/15/neolitsea-cuipala/ > This

[efloraofindia:441078] Re: Goa photo for identification - 8

Thank you so much for resurfacing. Regards, Tapas On Sun, 5 Feb 2023, 05:03 JM Garg, wrote: > A reply from Mohanan ji as per comments at the bottom at Garcinia > : > "All the photographs put under *Garcinia travancorica* are of > *Garcinia

[efloraofindia:440455] Re: Combretum roxburghii Spreng.

Yes Saroj ji, Better not to follow Flora of India Volume 9. On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, 23:29 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you Tapas Da ! *Combretum album *Pers. is Syn, isn't it ? > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 10:11 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: >

[efloraofindia:440452] Re: Combretum roxburghii Spreng.

As per Gangopadhyay in V. Singh *et al.*, Flora of India 9: 326. 2021, this is *Combretum album *Pers., an illegitimate name. For me, this is *Combretum roxburghii *Spreng. With regards, Tapas On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 8:42 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, appears close to images at >

Re: [efloraofindia:440249] Euphorbiaceae sp. Id please

This is a Croton. Similar to C. klotzschianus but it may be a variant with much smaller parts. On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, 23:53 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Bharathi ji > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: bharathi raja > Date: Tue, 24 Jan, 2023, 1:02

Re: [efloraofindia:440184] Re: SK 3675 24 January 2023

This is Euphorbia. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:30 PM Tapas Chakrabarty >> wrote: >> >>> Daphniphyllum himalayense. Lal chandan in Nepali. >>> >>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, 15:09 Saroj Ka

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >