Re: [efloraofindia:407719] Wild Plant for ID : Borgad Conservation Reserve : Nasik : 20NOV21 : AK - 015

Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, 12:31 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Smita ji, for the id. > Yes, appears close to the images at Anisomeles heyneana > > > On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 21:52, Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >>

Fwd: [efloraofindia:407710] Goa photo for identification - 10

As per Plant for ID : Ornamental 24/11/2011 SMP1 : "I think it might be a cultivated for of Asystasia nemorum but may respond more certainly later John Wood" -- Forwarded message

Re: [efloraofindia:407709] Wild Plant for ID : Borgad Conservation Reserve : Nasik : 20NOV21 : AK - 015

Thanks, Smita ji, for the id. Yes, appears close to the images at Anisomeles heyneana On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 21:52, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks Smita Ji. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:00 PM Smita Raskar > wrote:

Re: [efloraofindia:407706] trumpet flower for ID :: Vythiri, Wayanad :: 13 NOV 19

Ok, thanks Garg ji. Regards. Dinesh On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, 11:14 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Hi, Dinesh ji, > I think difference pointed out by Singh ji, is very much correct. > Pl. check efi pages of both. And you will realise the difference quite > clearly. > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Fri,

Re: [efloraofindia:407705] trumpet flower for ID :: Vythiri, Wayanad :: 13 NOV 19

Hi, Dinesh ji, I think difference pointed out by Singh ji, is very much correct. Pl. check efi pages of both. And you will realise the difference quite clearly. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Fri, 26 Nov, 2021, 10:40 am Dinesh Valke, wrote: > Thanks Garg ji for pointing to this ID. I have

Re: [efloraofindia:407705] GARDEN :: Apocynaceae (dogbane family) » Allamanda schottii

Thanks Gurcharan ji and Garg ji. I have revised my notes accordingly. Again, here the posted pictures have plants of bushy and dwarf habit, with almost Nerium-like leaves. It could be that it is *Allamanda cathartica* var. *schottii* (Pohl) L.H.Bailey & Raffill

Re: [efloraofindia:407703] MS, Nov., 2021/64 Tree/Shrub for id

Thanks, Paradesi ji. Hi, Sawmliana ji, Any keys? On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 19:10, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Eriolaena sp., > With regards. > > > > [image: Mailtrack] > >

Re: [efloraofindia:407701] Re: I'd requested

Hi, Seema ji, Was it wild or planted? On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 17:35, Mahadeswara wrote: > Pl check for *Chrysanthemum *species. > > On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 2:52:48 PM UTC+5:30 seemabinzee786 wrote: > >> Location Rajouri jandk >> Date: 20/11/2021 >> > -- > You received this message

Re: [efloraofindia:407701] trumpet flower for ID :: Vythiri, Wayanad :: 13 NOV 19

Thanks Garg ji for pointing to this ID. I have labelled my photos at flickr accordingly. These ornamentals can be tricky to go as per descriptions of any one aspect like flowers - that is what I think. So many cultivars and hybrids, that their aspects may not match the actual species. *Allamanda

[efloraofindia:407700] Re: Dendrobium secundum (Orchidaceae) for validation

Yes, appears close as per images at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendrobium_secundum https://travaldo.blogspot.com/2017/11/grow-and-care-dendrobium-secundum-orchid.html https://www.orchidweb.com/orchids/dendrobium/species/dendrobium-secundum https://www.nparks.gov.sg/florafaunaweb/flora/5/8/5886

Re: [efloraofindia:407700] Re: Allamanda cathartica?

Thanks Gurcharan ji and Garg ji for illustrating the differences among the two species. Regards. Dinesh On Tuesday, 23 November 2021 at 15:43:07 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Singh ji. > You seem to be right. > I think the difference given above may be more appropriate to > differentiate

Re: [efloraofindia:407698] Ficus for ID from Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh-GS24112021-2

Ficus neerifolia (=F. nemoralis) !!! Dr. G S Goraya, IFS (Retd.) 735-B, Joginder Vihar, Army Flats, Phase-2 (Sector-54), SAS Nagar, Mohali - 160 055 (Punjab) Tel. (Mob.) +91-941-802-5036 From: indiantreepix@googlegroups.com on behalf of Gurcharan Singh Sent:

Re: [efloraofindia:407697] Fwd: [itpmods:16189] Fwd: Efloraofindia site completed 11 years on 2.11.21

Congratulations to everyone associated with eFI... On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 6:01 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Mohina Macker > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 17:51 > Subject: Re: [itpmods:16189] Fwd: Efloraofindia site completed 11 years on > 2.11.21 > To:

Re: [efloraofindia:407697] Re: Poinsettia-290611MN

Many Meanings of Pascua The Spanish word for Easter, *Pascua, *which is usually capitalized

[efloraofindia:407692] I. discolor / I. kathmanduensis

Dear Mr. Garg, According to the recently published book "Wild balsam of Darjeeling and Sikkim Himalaya- A Pictorial Handbook" by Raji Gogoi et all, I feel we should to segregate these two species as separate ID . Thank you. Saroj Kasaju -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [efloraofindia:407690] Artemisia for ID from Jawahar Tunnel Kashmir-GS25112021-3

*Artemisia siversiana* Ehrh. ex Willd. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:22 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Need ID of Artemisia clicked from Upper Munda, below Jawahar Tunnel, > Kashmir, alt. 2000 m, 22-8-2011 > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB

Re: [efloraofindia:407688] Artemisia for ID from Dachhigam Kashmir-GS25112021-1

*Artemisia scoparia *Waldst. & Kit. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:51 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Artemisia for ID, Dachhigam Kashmir, alt. 1800 m, 30-7-2011. > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi,

[efloraofindia:407683] Re: SK 3155 20 November 2021

it seems *J. membranaceus.* *for distribution please check * https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:443203-1 *Thanks & Regards* Sunit Singh [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by

[efloraofindia:407682] Fwd: SK 3155 20 November 2021

Thanks a lot, Ishwari ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Dr. Ishwari Rai <> Date: Thu, 25 Nov, 2021, 6:32 pm Subject: Re: SK 3155 20 November 2021 To: J.M. Garg Garg ji, it looks closer to Juncus thomsonii...let see response of other experts. Ishwari

[efloraofindia:407681] Re: SK 3171 25 November 2021

E. amurense, tibetanum , wallichianum, sikkimense are listed in the book matching to this elevation. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:15 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Appears to be *Epilobium brevifolium* subsp. *brevifolium* >

[efloraofindia:407680] Re: SK 3171 25 November 2021

Appears to be *Epilobium brevifolium* subsp. *brevifolium* as per images and details herein and as per comparative images at Epilobium . Looks different from

[efloraofindia:407678] Re: SK 3169 25 November 2021

Appears to be *Epilobium brevifolium* subsp. *brevifolium* as per images and details herein and as per comparative images at Epilobium . On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at

[efloraofindia:407678] Re: SK 3170 25 November 2021

Appears to be *Epilobium brevifolium* subsp. *brevifolium* as per images and details herein and as per comparative images at Epilobium . On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at

[efloraofindia:407677] Re: SK 3156 20 November 2021

Appears to be *Epilobium brevifolium* subsp. *brevifolium* as per images and details herein and as per comparative images at Epilobium . On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:407674] MS,Nov.,2021/44 Elatostema sp. ? for id.

To me appears close to *Elatostema dissectum* Wedd. as per images and details herein and as per GBIF specimen- one

Re: [efloraofindia:407673] MS,Nov.,2021/45 Elastotema sp. for id.

Yes, as per keys in MS,Nov.,2021/44 Elatostema sp. ? for id. and as per comparative images at Elatostema . On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 12:36, J.M. Garg wrote: > To me appears close to images

Re: [efloraofindia:407670] MS,Nov.,2021/40 Elatostema sp. for id.

Yes, as per keys in MS,Nov.,2021/44 Elatostema sp. ? for id. and as per comparative images at Elatostema . On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 12:33, J.M. Garg wrote: > To me appears close to images

Re: [efloraofindia:407670] MS,Nov.,2021/39 Elatostema sp. for id.

Yes, as per keys in MS,Nov.,2021/44 Elatostema sp. ? for id. and as per comparative images at Elatostema . On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 12:32, J.M. Garg wrote: > To me appears close to images

Re: [efloraofindia:407670] MS,Nov.,2021/38 Elatostema sessile ? for id/confirmation

Yes, as per keys in MS,Nov.,2021/44 Elatostema sp. ? for id. and as per comparative images at Elatostema . On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 12:29, J.M. Garg wrote: > To me appears close to images

[efloraofindia:407668] Re: SK 3171 25 November 2021

*Epilobium cylindricum* D. Don. ??? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:16 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:16 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:16 PM Saroj

[efloraofindia:407667] Re: SK 3169 25 November 2021

*Epilobium brevifolium* D. Don. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:54 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:54 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:54 PM Saroj

[efloraofindia:407666] Re: SK 3170 25 November 2021

*Epilobium amurense *Hausskn ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:11 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:10 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:10 PM Saroj Kasaju

[efloraofindia:407654] Re: SK 3170 25 November 2021

Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:10 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:10 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:10 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you.

[efloraofindia:407646] Re: SK 3127 11 November 2021

No Mayur ji, it is 1000 km away. However, I shall compare. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:17 PM mayur nandikar wrote: > Dear Saroj ji, > > Have you compared it with *Commelina maculata*? Please check it at once. > If you have access to the place then see if you can observe

[efloraofindia:407645] Re: SK 3127 11 November 2021

Dear Saroj ji, Have you compared it with *Commelina maculata*? Please check it at once. If you have access to the place then see if you can observe a few more characters like spathe, capsule and seeds. Thank you! sincerely, Mayur On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:59 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Only 2

Re: [efloraofindia:407644] Garden Plant for ID : Coleus : Nasik : 24NOV21 : AK - 022

Please check efi. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Yes Saroj Ji. > Was trying to find the hybrid name. > Regards > Aarti > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2021, 22:39 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > >> *Plectranthus scutellarioides* (L.) R.Br. >> Thank you. >> >>

[efloraofindia:407643] Re: SK 3127 11 November 2021

Only 2 sp. benghalenis and paludosa are listed in the book but I guess this may be different one. May be Mayur ji could give some opinion. https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/B_YZ9YzAiVE/m/lFcWk3xsBgAJ Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 1:25 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi,

[efloraofindia:407642] Re: SK 3109 05 November 2021

Thank you Dr. mathew. Two sp. are listed in the book of Karnali Province ( Related locality) R. densiflora and rotundifola. Any possibility of R. densiflora ?? Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:31 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Mathew ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > >