Dear friends,
This is neither *Litsea wightiana* Hook , since the similarity can only be
assigned to *Litsea wightiana* Hook var tomentosa. but the nature of the
specimen especially the pubescence clearly indicate this is not *Litsea
wightiana* Hook and there are many other reason refer to
Dear friends,
I have been following the Lauraceae members especially Litsea and
Cryptocarya for a long time. It is very difficult to differentiate most of
the times. I have examined this and i feel it is* Litsea floribunda*
Gamble. as suggested by Dr. Garg
*Litsea wightiana* Hook is having
not Mollugo
Dr. K.H. Amitha Bachan
Assi. Prof. Research Dept. of Botany
MES Asmabi College, Kodungallur &
RD, Western Ghats Hornbill Foundation
Kerala, India.
www.hornbillfoundation.org
0091-9497627870
3 matches
Mail list logo
