[efloraofindia:350980] Re: Chamaecrista species for validation.

Some details : Tiny herbaceous plant. More of prostrate with few rising branches. around 1 foot Dr Satish Phadke On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 14:48, Satish Phadke wrote: > Observed this Chamaecrista species near a water body on hills near Pune. > I think it's *Chamaecrista mimosoides.* > Please

Re: [efloraofindia:351018] Rosaceae week_Rubus sp. for ID_RKC07_03102011

OK Mr. Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:15 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Looks different as per these links also. > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 08:36, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Actually I have verified with Dr. Rokaya and >> he is with the same opinion. >> Rubus paniculatus Sm.

[efloraofindia:351016] Re: SK1820 10 March 2019 - Mycophyta

OK Mr Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:30 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I do not think so as per > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panaeolus_papilionaceus > https://www.flickr.com/photos/volvob12b/26813832182 > http://entheology.com/plants/panaeolus-spinctrinus-hoop-petticoat/

Re: [efloraofindia:351018] Request for Id of Jasminum from Mahe

Thank you very much Saroj ji. with warm regards, B. Subramaniam On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 3:57 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > J. mutiflorum ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 3:20 PM Bala Subramaniam < > balasubramaniam1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> Request for Id

[efloraofindia:351015] Re: Fwd: SK1788 15 Feb 2019 - Mycophyta

OK Mr Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:34 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I do not think so as per > https://mycena.no/tintinnabulum.htm > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycena_tintinnabulum > https://www.artsdatabanken.no/Pages/172891/ >

[efloraofindia:351014] Re: SK670 24 JUL-2017:ID

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:56 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, you are right as per GBIF > Specimen 1 >

Re: [efloraofindia:351020] Asteraceae sp.from Assam KD 02 April 2020

Thanks, Karuna ji. Yes, you are right as per images, details and references at Conyza leucantha On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 19:52, 'kd_...@rediffmail.com' via efloraofindia <

Re: [efloraofindia:350978] Arunachal flora -1

Thanks, Navendu ji. On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 13:32, navendu page wrote: > A species of Henckelia (Gesneriaceae) > > Navendu > > > > Virus-free. > www.avg.com >

[efloraofindia:351032] Re: Plant for ID SMP May 2020

It doesn't look like Fabaceae but Caesalpiniaceae only Dr Satish Phadke On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 16:53, Satish Phadke wrote: > A Fabaceae plant 1-3 feet height on Vetal Hills Pune with small flowers > compound leaves with pods as seen. > Is it Chamaecrista or Aeschynomene species? > Dr Satish

Re: [efloraofindia:350973] Arunachal flora -1

A species of Henckelia (Gesneriaceae) Navendu Virus-free. www.avg.com

Re: [efloraofindia:350974] third species of cordia

Yes, I too think its C. macleodii Navendu Virus-free. www.avg.com

[efloraofindia:350979] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎‎ Paulowniaceae‎- comparative images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎*‎ *Paulowniaceae* *‎* are now with comparative images. May I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in

[efloraofindia:350984] Re: Chamaecrista species for validation.

Sorry for the mixup. These images are there on our data on https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/f/fabaceae/chamaecrista/chamaecrista-mimosoides and are from Mahabaleshwar. I have seen similar plant in Pune and wanted to validate and confirm that. Has anybody seen this species

Re: [efloraofindia:350996] third species of cordia

thank you, fruiting calyx different from our specimen On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 1:37 PM navendu page wrote: > Yes, I too think its C. macleodii > > Navendu > > > > Virus-free. > www.avg.com >

Re: [efloraofindia:351004] Arunachal flora -1

Thanks a lot for the id. Thanks a lot Gargji, specially for your perseverance. ushaprabha. On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 14:03, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Navendu ji. > > On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 13:32, navendu page wrote: > >> A species of Henckelia (Gesneriaceae) >> >> Navendu >> >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:351012] Arunachal flora -1

Tried all possibilities but could not get exact match. Ultimately deformed Henckelia urticifolia?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 3:36 PM ushaprabha page wrote: > Thanks a lot for the id. > Thanks a lot Gargji, specially for your perseverance. > ushaprabha. > > > On Sun, 24

Re: [efloraofindia:351013] Request for Id of Jasminum from Mahe

J. mutiflorum ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 3:20 PM Bala Subramaniam < balasubramaniam1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear All, > Request for Id of Jasminum from Mahe. Photographed in September 2019. > Thanks and Regards, > B. Subramaniam > > -- > You received this message

Re: [efloraofindia:351034] Re: SK 2625 24 May 2020

Piper longum? On Sun, 24 May 2020, 16:18 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:32 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:31 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:351033] Re: Plant for ID SMP May 2020

Seems to be Chamaecrista. B. Subramaniam On Sun, 24 May 2020, 16:56 Satish Phadke, wrote: > It doesn't look like Fabaceae but Caesalpiniaceae only > Dr Satish Phadke > > > On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 16:53, Satish Phadke wrote: > >> A Fabaceae plant 1-3 feet height on Vetal Hills Pune with small

[efloraofindia:351035] Names of Plants in India :: Indigofera astragalina DC.

via Species ‎ > ‎I ‎ > ‎ *Indigofera astragalina* DC. ... *family*: Fabaceae [image: Indigofera astragalina DC.]

Re: [efloraofindia:350963] third species of cordia

Thanks, Lalithamba ji. On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 10:25, Lalithamba Avadhanam wrote: > it is Cordia gharaf; leaf base acute to rounded, margin entire to > shallowly crenate, fruit calyx recurved , > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 9:19 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please.

[efloraofindia:350968] Re: SK1820 10 March 2019 - Mycophyta

I do not think so as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panaeolus_papilionaceus https://www.flickr.com/photos/volvob12b/26813832182 http://entheology.com/plants/panaeolus-spinctrinus-hoop-petticoat/ https://www.first-nature.com/fungi/panaeolus-papilionaceus.php

[efloraofindia:350970] Re: SK670 24 JUL-2017:ID

Yes, you are right as per GBIF Specimen 1 Specimen 2

Re: [efloraofindia:350967] Rosaceae week_Rubus sp. for ID_RKC07_03102011

Looks different as per these links also. On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 08:36, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Actually I have verified with Dr. Rokaya and > he is with the same opinion. > Rubus paniculatus Sm. > Rubus paniculatus Sm. >

Re: [efloraofindia:350965] third species of cordia

Correct wording: *Cordia gharaf* is a syn. of *Cordia sinensis* (CoL

[efloraofindia:350969] Re: Fwd: SK1788 15 Feb 2019 - Mycophyta

I do not think so as per https://mycena.no/tintinnabulum.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycena_tintinnabulum https://www.artsdatabanken.no/Pages/172891/ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mycena_tintinnabulum On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 09:30, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Mycena tintinnabulum

Re: [efloraofindia:350964] third species of cordia

*Cuscuta gharaf* is a syn. of *Cordia sinensis* (CoL and POWO

Re: [efloraofindia:350966] third species of cordia

Also I could not find a similar specimen in GBIF . On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 11:42, J.M. Garg wrote: > Correct wording: > *Cordia gharaf* is a syn. of *Cordia sinensis* >

[efloraofindia:351036] Re: SK 2626 24 May 2020 - Mycophyta

Auricularia auricula-judae doesn't occur here. Microscopy required to determine the spp. You must still check A.villosula. On 24 May 2020 4:22 p.m., "Saroj Kasaju" wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:36 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:351041] Remusatia pumila for confirmation

Yes Garg sir it is Remusatia hookeriana Schott I had already confirmed it though earlier i forgot to reply, the species is reported from Himachal Pradesh and is also matching with illustrations as well as herbarium images on gbif... https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1998879735 Best regard Ashutosh

[efloraofindia:351039] Peperomia blanda

Hi, Tabish ji, Images of Peperomia blanda in FOI should be of *Peperomia dindygulensis* Miq. as references and

[efloraofindia:351037] Re: SK 2626 24 May 2020 - Mycophyta

Thanks, Suhaib ji. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 25 May, 2020, 5:23 AM Suhaib Yatoo, wrote: > Auricularia auricula-judae doesn't occur here. > Microscopy required to determine the spp. > You must still check A.villosula. > > On 24 May 2020 4:22 p.m., "Saroj Kasaju" wrote: > >> >> Thank

[efloraofindia:351040] Peperomia‎‎‎ ‎(Piperaceae‎)- comparative images of species in efloraofindia

Dear members, Pl. go through‎ *Peperomia* *‎**‎‎* ‎(*Piperaceae* *‎*) page with comparative images of species in efloraofindia. May I request