[efloraofindia:404045] Re: Lagerstroemia For ID : White Flower : 301013 : AK-3

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia species- Muscat Group discussion at Lagerstroemia For ID : White Flower : 301013 : AK-3 (google.com) On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 at

Re: [efloraofindia:404059] Fwd: Loranthus sp from Satpura – NSD 50

Image not very clear to ID ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 8:58 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Scurrula species- Dhoopgarh area of Satpura Tiger Reserve > >

[efloraofindia:404031] Re: NAKED TREE ID----12th DECEMBER 2011----S.S---005--- Gantok Botanic Garden.

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia species ? Group discussion at NAKED TREE ID12th DECEMBER 2011S.S---005--- Gantok Botanic Garden. (google.com) On

Re: [efloraofindia:404055] Re: [Indiantreepix] Re: For Id 010708JM

Images not clear. Difficult toy Id ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:42 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia tomentosa ? > > Group discussion at > For Id 010708JM

[efloraofindia:404052] Re: SK 3049 16 October 2021

Thank you Dr. Liden for the correct ID. Actually I took guidance from the list of A Book on Karnali published by Karnali Province Government and we have found many sp. during our one month trip which are not listed in the book. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:13 AM J.M. Garg wrote: >

Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:404052] Tree for id 220510MK1

Yes ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:49 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia parviflora ? > > Group discussion at > Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:36976] Tree for id

Re: [efloraofindia:404052] Fwd: For Id 010708JM

Images not clear. Difficult to ID! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:43 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia tomentosa ? > > Group discussion at > For Id 010708JM

Re: [efloraofindia:404052] Fwd: NAKED TREE ID----12th DECEMBER 2011----S.S---005--- Gantok Botanic Garden.

Difficult to ID ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:46 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia species ? > > Group discussion at > NAKED TREE ID12th DECEMBER

Re: [efloraofindia:404062] Fwd: Lamiaceae (incl. Vebenaceae) Fortnight 1-14May2014: Salvia for ID from Uttarakhand_DSR_May_1/1

But I think from the notes of Rawat ji, that it was wild? Rawat ji pl. confirm. On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 18:29, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Yes to me ! Should be cultivated ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 5:51 PM Gurcharan Singh > wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >>

Re: [efloraofindia:404064] Fwd: Fruit for Id- ID12042016 SH1

The leafless tree is Lagerstroemia parviflora Regards Radha On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 11:30:14 PM UTC-6 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Not easy to ID ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:01 AM Gurcharan Singh > wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >> Distributed as

Re: [efloraofindia:404068] Requesting a shrub id.

Uraria sp. With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 10/24/21, 11:27:23 AM On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:404068] Requesting a fern id

Cheilanthes mysorensis, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 10/24/21, 11:25:43 AM On Sun, 24

Re: [efloraofindia:404037] Mariyam 01 Jan21

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia species?- Agra, U.P. Group discussion at Mariyam 01 Jan21 (google.com) On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 10:04:16 PM

[efloraofindia:404035] Re: Tree for ID 040212 PM 002

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia parviflora ? Group discussion at Tree for ID 040212 PM 002 (google.com) On Sunday, February 5, 2012 at 1:05:21 PM UTC+5:30

Re: [efloraofindia:404059] Swamy/New series/ID/4 - Lagerstroemia speciosa

Lagerstroemia floribunda* Jack is correct ID ! * https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1799096732

Re: [efloraofindia:404059] Fwd: Mariyam 01 Jan21

Lagerstroemia speciosa Regards Radha On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 11:30:52 PM UTC-6 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > No flowers? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:55 AM Gurcharan Singh > wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >> Distributed as Lagerstroemia species?- Agra,

Re: [efloraofindia:404059] Fwd: ID Please : Lagestroemia ?

*Lagerstroemia floribunda *Jack ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 9:27 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia floribunda ? > > Group discussion at > ID Please : Lagestroemia

Re: [efloraofindia:404039] Tree Id 301213SK2

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia species ?- North Paravur, Ernakulam, Kerala Group discussion at Fwd: [efloraofindia:178389] Tree Id 301213SK2 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:404065] Re: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: loranthus parasite found in the orange orchards of pasighat arunachal pradesh

*Helixanthera ligustrina *(Wall.) Danser ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 8:43 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Loranthaceae member- Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh > > Group

Re: [efloraofindia:404064] Fwd: loranthus parasite found in the orange orchards of pasighat arunachal pradesh

*Helixanthera ligustrina *(Wall.) Danser ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 8:44 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Loranthaceae member- Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh > > Group

[efloraofindia:404029] Re: [Indiantreepix] Re: For Id 010708JM

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia tomentosa ? Group discussion at For Id 010708JM (google.com) On Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 6:53:19 PM UTC+5:30 Madhuri

Re: [efloraofindia:404046] Tree Id 301213SK2

No flowers? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:57 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia species ?- North Paravur, Ernakulam, Kerala > > Group discussion at > Fwd:

Re: [efloraofindia:404047] Fwd: Fruit for Id- ID12042016 SH1

Not easy to ID ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:01 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia species- Nagzira Wildlife Sanctuary > > Group discussion at > Fruit for Id- ID12042016 SH1

Re: [efloraofindia:404047] Fwd: Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this tree at Lalbagh, Bangalore :: 26122013 :: ARK-36

Any flowers? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:03 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia species- Lalbagh, Bangalore > > Group discussion at > Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 ::

Re: [efloraofindia:404046] Fwd: Mariyam 01 Jan21

No flowers? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:55 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia species?- Agra, U.P. > > Group discussion at > Mariyam 01 Jan21 (google.com) >

Re: [efloraofindia:404046] Fwd: Lagerstroemia For ID : White Flower : 301013 : AK-3

Must be a cultivated sp. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:05 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia species- Muscat > > Group discussion at > Lagerstroemia For ID : White Flower :

Re: [efloraofindia:404046] Fwd: Tree for ID 040212 PM 002

No flowers? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:52 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia parviflora ? > > Group discussion at > Tree for ID 040212 PM 002 (google.com) >

Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:404033] Tree for id 220510MK1

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia parviflora ? Group discussion at Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:36976] Tree for id 220510MK1 (google.com) On Friday, June 4, 2010

Re: [efloraofindia:404041] Re: Fruit for Id- ID12042016 SH1

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia species- Nagzira Wildlife Sanctuary Group discussion at Fruit for Id- ID12042016 SH1 (google.com) On Monday, May 16, 2016 at 5:13:58 PM

Re: [efloraofindia:404043] Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this tree at Lalbagh, Bangalore :: 26122013 :: ARK-36

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia species- Lalbagh, Bangalore Group discussion at Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this tree at Lalbagh, Bangalore :: 26122013 :: ARK-36 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:404058] Fwd: Tree for ID 040212 PM 002

Lagerstroemia lanceolata Regards Radha On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 11:31:18 PM UTC-6 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > No flowers? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:52 AM Gurcharan Singh > wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >> Distributed as Lagerstroemia parviflora

[efloraofindia:403913] Re: Dioscorea villosa in FOI

On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 20:21, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 20:20 > Subject: Re: Dioscorea villosa in FOI > To: efloraofindia > Cc: Tabish > > > http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Wild%20Yam.html > > On

[efloraofindia:403919] Re: SK 3052 17 October 2021

Yes, as per images at Anaphalis triplinervis On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 08:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > *Dear Members,Location: Jumla, NepalAltitude: 2893m.Date: 18 August > 2021 Habit : Wild * > *Anaphalis triplinervis* (Sims) C. B.

[efloraofindia:403919] Re: SK 3052 17 October 2021

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 1:22 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, as per images at Anaphalis triplinervis > > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 08:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> *Dear Members,Location: Jumla,

[efloraofindia:403926] Re: SK 3054 17 October 2021

Yes, appears close to images at Potentilla griffithii and as per POWO specimens- one and two

[efloraofindia:403930] Re: SK 3053 17 October 2021

The owner said it is may be called Vietnamese Bean ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 1:47 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > What exactly do you mean by Vietnamese Bean ? > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 09:12, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> *Dear Members,Location: Palpa, NepalAltitude:

Re: [efloraofindia:403909] 29092011GS1 from Nandni (J & K) and Mussoorie Chakrata road for ID

Thanks Garg ji. On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 10:04:49 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Plant from Nandini, J belongs to *Conyza stricta* var. *pinnatifida *as > per keys in Flora of China > . > > > -- Forwarded message

Re: [efloraofindia:403924] Fwd: 190810 AK1

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendropthoe species- Mumbai Group discussion at Fwd: [efloraofindia:180145] Fwd: 190810 AK1 (google.com) On Saturday, January 25, 2014 at 5:27:18 PM

Fwd: [efloraofindia:403924] Fwd: 190810 AK1

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendropthoe species- Mumbai Group discussion at Fwd: [efloraofindia:180145] Fwd: 190810 AK1 (google.com) -- Forwarded message - From:

Re: [efloraofindia:403924] Re: 140 ID wild plant Commelina

In the collage #20211023_115502, C.cristata is in the right side, kind regards, Sam. On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 1:03 pm Sam Kuzhalanattu, wrote: > Dear Garg ji & Mayur ji, > Please check the below comparison on C. cristata & ID 140 with collage > images. > *C. cristata.*

Re: [efloraofindia:403909] Re: SK 3067 22 October 2021

For me it is correct sir On Sat, 23 Oct, 2021, 07:43 Mahadeswara, wrote: > One of the medicinal plants (Chinese). > > On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 6:23:41 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> *Dear Members,Location: Jumla, NepalAltitude: 2570m.Date: 18 August >> 2021 Habit : Wild

Re: [efloraofindia:403916] Wild Plant for ID : Way to Nasik : 08OCT21 : AK - 014

Thanks, Radha ji. Yes, there is a possibility of it being *Blumea paniculata* (Willd.) M.R.Almeida On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 21:49, radha veach wrote: > > Looks like lower leaves of Blumea

Re: [efloraofindia:403917] Re: Plant For ID : Bangalore : 03FEB17 : AK-1

May I request you to post high res. image to check the details. On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 07:51, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks Saroj Ji. > I have posted Heliotropium arborescens from Kenya earlier, which was > identified by Nidhan Ji. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Sat, 16 Oct 2021, 18:43 Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:403922] Loranthaceae of Indonesia

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendropthoe species- Indonesia Group discussion at Loranthaceae of Indonesia (google.com) On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 11:10:36 AM UTC+5:30 JM

[efloraofindia:403927] Re: SK 3053 17 October 2021

What exactly do you mean by Vietnamese Bean ? On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 09:12, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > *Dear Members,Location: Palpa, NepalAltitude: 1100m.Date: 02 September > 2021 Habit : Cultivated* > Vietnamese Bean ??? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You

Re: [efloraofindia:403929] MS,Oct ,2021/31 Piper sp. ? for id.

Any keys? On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 11:16, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > Piper nigrum L. ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > -- Forwarded message - > From: M Sawmliana > Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 14:46 >

[efloraofindia:403909] Re: I'd plz Justicia spp. ?- 161021SR2

*Justicia simplex *D.Don ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 11:32, J.M. Garg wrote: > Segregating post clubbed due to same subject > : > Location : Ranakandorna, Porbandar, Gujarat > Date : 08-10-2021 > Habit : Herb >

Re: [efloraofindia:403912] Re: SK 3067 22 October 2021

Thank you Mahadeswara Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:49 AM M Swamy wrote: > For me it is correct sir > > On Sat, 23 Oct, 2021, 07:43 Mahadeswara, wrote: > >> One of the medicinal plants (Chinese). >> >> On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 6:23:41 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju >>

[efloraofindia:403939] Fwd: SK 3051 16 October 2021

Thanks a lot, Ishwari ji, for the id. Yes, it appears close to images at *Triplostegia glandulifera* Wall. ex DC. -- Forwarded message - From: Dr. Ishwari Rai Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021

Re: [efloraofindia:403940] MS,Oct,2021/45 Cymbopogon sp. for id.

On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 12:58, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Manoj ji. > Hi, Sawmliana ji, > May I request you to post a high res. image. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Manoj Chandran > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 12:45 > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:402885] MS,Oct,2021/45

[efloraofindia:403946] Re: SK 3031 10 October 2021

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:05 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, appears close as per > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hieracium_umbellatum > https://www.minnesotawildflowers.info/flower/narrow-leaf-hawkweed >

[efloraofindia:403949] Re: Impatiens devendrae Pusalkar ??

I shall do that. Thank you Dr. Adamnowski! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:51 PM Wojciech Adamowski wrote: > General sources are sometimes deadly wrong... > Check this: Hooker J.D. 1881. Impatiens amphorata. Curtis’s Botanical > Magazine 107, tab. 6550 on www.botanicus org. > or >

[efloraofindia:403947] Re: SK 3051 16 October 2021

Thank you Dr. Rai for ID ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 3:41 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Ishwari ji, for the id. > Yes, it appears close to images at *Triplostegia glandulifera* Wall. ex > DC. >

[efloraofindia:403948] Re: SK 3053 17 October 2021

I also tried but no luck ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 3:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > No match at all on google search. > > On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 14:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> The owner said it is may be called Vietnamese Bean ! >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On

Re: [efloraofindia:403950] Re: Salvia plebeia R.Br. (accepted name) ??

May be right ? https://www.google.com/url?sa=i=https%3A%2F%2Fidentify.plantnet.org%2Fthe-plant-list%2Fspecies%2FSalvia%2520coccinea%2520Buc%27hoz%2520ex%2520Etl.%2Fdata=AOvVaw07_Q4i3m5-b7cI119Jmkh-=1635078424064000=images=vfe=0CAsQjRxqFwoTCKCckfnD4PMCFQAdABAL

Re: [efloraofindia:403950] Fwd: Garden flower for ID - 180813 - RK

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Saroj ji. > Appears close as per > > https://www.aucklandbotanicgardens.co.nz/plants-for-auckland/plants/salvia-indigo-spires/ > >

Re: [efloraofindia:403970] Help with ID of tree from Kashmir-GS10102021-3

Thanks, Paradesi ji. Already placed at Celastrus paniculatus subsp. aggregatus ? , as per earlier posting. On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 14:06, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Celastraceae, >

Re: [efloraofindia:403989] MS,Oct,2021/32 Baliospermum sp. ? for id

Thanks, Tapas ji. How is it different from the Type variety? I could not open the BSI efloraofindia. On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 17:38, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Baliospermum calycinum var. micranthum. > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, 11:23 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Thanks, Saroj ji, for the id. >> To me

[efloraofindia:403935] Re: SK 3053 17 October 2021

No match at all on google search. On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 14:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > The owner said it is may be called Vietnamese Bean ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 1:47 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> What exactly do you mean by Vietnamese Bean ? >> >> On Sun, 17

Re: [efloraofindia:403933] Urticaceae sp-2 for ID- Munnar-PKA58

Thanks, Vinayaraj ji. I am doubt as per images at *Pilea scripta* (Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don) Wedd. On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 14:42, Vinayaraj V R wrote: > I am told > May be Pilea scripta > > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2021, 12:33 J.M.

[efloraofindia:403936] Re: SK 3051 16 October 2021

Not Brassicaceae Regards On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:22 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Very interesting plant with glandular parts. > Brassicaceae > ? > > -- Forwarded message

Re: [efloraofindia:403968] Acanthaceae Fortnight :: Barleria prionitis :: Thane, Yeoor Hills :: DVMAR21/32

Hello Garg ji, and friends. I have a strong feeling that the first picture (taken at Vaghbil, Thane on December 25, 2006) is *Barleria cuspidata*. Please validate. Regards. Dinesh On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 18:14:19 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Dinesh ji > I hope you will help me out in

[efloraofindia:403969] Fwd: [itpmods:16069] Fwd: Posted in 2016, published as a new species in 2021

-- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 20:06 Subject: Re: [itpmods:16069] Fwd: Posted in 2016, published as a new species in 2021 To: itpmods Thanks, Anil ji, Currently I have started to keep such posts at Role of eFI in Sc. publications

[efloraofindia:403980] Re: Dipsacus inermis Wall.

Although Flora of Pakistan gives both varieties, with differences at *Dipsacus inermis* var. *inermis

Re: [efloraofindia:403990] Fwd: Scutellaria sp.for ID- 08022014- PKA-Feb-21

Yes, Saroj ji, You may be correct as per images at Scutellaria repens However, it is neither listed in FoPI nor I could find it on net in South India. On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 18:22, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Though flower color is different

[efloraofindia:403992] Re: Scutellaria repens Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don (accepted name)

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 10:12 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, it appears to be Scutellaria repens > , as per images > and details at Scutellaria repens Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don >

Re: [efloraofindia:403938] Re: Salvia plebeia R.Br. (accepted name) ??

Hi, Saroj ji, One of the images is very good. It is worth trying. Pl. check *Salvia coccinea* Buc’hoz ex Etl. On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 12:52, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Not sufficient details. Better to forget it ! > Thank

Re: [efloraofindia:403942] Fwd: Garden flower for ID - 180813 - RK

Thanks, Saroj ji. Appears close as per https://www.aucklandbotanicgardens.co.nz/plants-for-auckland/plants/salvia-indigo-spires/ https://www.almostedenplants.com/shopping/products/909-indigo-spires-salvia/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvia_%27Indigo_Spires%27 On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 13:17,

Re: [efloraofindia:403943] Fwd: BND 33 14/11/14

I think looks different as per https://efloraofindia.com/2019/09/27/salvia-skyscraper-pink/ On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 13:20, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Salvia ‘Skyscraper Pink’ ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 11:28 AM Gurcharan Singh > wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >>

[efloraofindia:403944] Re: SK 3031 10 October 2021

Yes, appears close as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hieracium_umbellatum https://www.minnesotawildflowers.info/flower/narrow-leaf-hawkweed https://gobotany.nativeplanttrust.org/species/hieracium/umbellatum/ http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=57382_id=1

[efloraofindia:403980] Re: Dipsacus inermis Wall.

Although Flora of Pakistan gives both varieties, with differences at *Dipsacus inermis* var. *inermis

[efloraofindia:403981] Re: Dipsacus inermis Wall.

Although Flora of Pakistan gives both varieties, with differences at *Dipsacus inermis* var. *inermis

[efloraofindia:403982] Re: Dipsacus inermis Wall.

Although Flora of Pakistan gives both varieties, with differences at *Dipsacus inermis* var. *inermis

[efloraofindia:403986] Fwd: [itpmods:16074] Fwd: Posted in 2016, published as a new species in 2021

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Lalithamba Avadhanam Date: Sat, 23 Oct, 2021, 8:51 pm Subject: Re: [itpmods:16074] Fwd: Posted in 2016, published as a new species in 2021 To: itpmods that is great, a moral boost to all contributors, thank you On Sat,

Re: [efloraofindia:403993] Fwd: Scutellaria sp.for ID- 08022014- PKA-Feb-21

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 10:11 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, Saroj ji, > You may be correct as per images at Scutellaria repens > > However, it is neither listed in FoPI nor I could find it on net in

[efloraofindia:403937] Re: SK139OCT09-2016:ID

Not *Clinopodium piperitum* (D.Don) Murata , as per images herein. Not even matching with any species of Clinopodium as per comparative images herein, as the

[efloraofindia:403945] Re: Impatiens scabrida DC.

Thank you Dr. Admowski ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:30 PM Wojciech Adamowski wrote: > Dear Mr. Kasaju, > and this is what Dr. Akiyama call Impatiens tricornis and what was earlier > often named I. scabrida or I. cristata, with less or more saccate lower > sepal and appendage on

[efloraofindia:403985] Re: Dipsacus inermis Wall.

FoP drawing indicates so: http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110_id=200022576 ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 8:58 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Although Flora of Pakistan > > gives both varieties, with

Re: [efloraofindia:403950] Urticaceae sp-2 for ID- Munnar-PKA58

Looks different from P.scripta ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 3:07 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Vinayaraj ji. > I am doubt as per images at *Pilea scripta* (Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don) Wedd. > > > On Sat,

[efloraofindia:403971] Re: SK 3071 23 October 2021

Correction- Date: 20 August 2021 Elev : 2957m Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 7:05 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 7:04 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Sat, Oct

[efloraofindia:403988] Fwd: [itpmods:16070] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back

-- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 21:25 Subject: Re: [itpmods:16070] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back To: itpmods Unfortunately, it is not working, yesterday and today, when I tried. On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 18:54, Dinesh Valke wrote: > Thanks

Re: [efloraofindia:403999] Re: 171 ID wild plant

Gymnema sp., With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 10/24/21, 06:07:38 AM On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:404000] Re: 171 ID wild plant

*Gymnema* *sylvestre* (Retz.) R.Br. ex Sm. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 6:23 am, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gymnema sp., > With regards. > > > > [image: Mailtrack] >

Re: [efloraofindia:404001] Re: 171 ID wild plant

Yes, it is dear Saroj ji and Paradesi ji. But the fruit image is different. The fruit image is collected from similar plant (in my view) half km distance and no flowers in it. With kind regards, Sam. On Sun, 24 Oct 2021, 7:51 am Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > *Gymnema* *sylvestre* (Retz.) R.Br. ex

Re: [efloraofindia:404002] Re: 171 ID wild plant

OK Sam. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 8:38 am, Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Yes, it is dear Saroj ji and Paradesi ji. But the fruit image is > different. The fruit image is collected from similar plant (in my view) > half km distance and no flowers in it. With kind regards, Sam.

[efloraofindia:404004] Re: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: loranthus parasite found in the orange orchards of pasighat arunachal pradesh

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Loranthaceae member- Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh Group discussion at Fwd: loranthus parasite found in the orange orchards of pasighat arunachal pradesh (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:404006] ID Request- Munnar-PKA46

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Loranthaceae member- Eravikulam National Park, Kerala Group discussion at ID Request- Munnar-PKA46 (google.com) On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at

[efloraofindia:404008] Re: SK 2249 27 October 2019

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Loranthaceae member- Phulchoki, Lalitpur, Nepal Group discussion at SK 2249 27 October 2019 (google.com) On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 12:47:26 PM

[efloraofindia:404010] Re: Loranthus sp from Satpura – NSD 50

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Scurrula species- Dhoopgarh area of Satpura Tiger Reserve Group discussion at Loranthus sp from Satpura – NSD 50 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:404013] Fwd: ID Please : Lagestroemia ?

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia floribunda ? Group discussion at ID Please : Lagestroemia ? (google.com) On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 12:35:15 PM UTC+5:30

Re: [efloraofindia:404015] Fwd: Lagerstroemia thorelli

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia floribunda ? Group discussion at Lagerstroemia thorelli (google.com) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 5:53:43 PM UTC+5:30 JM

[efloraofindia:404015] Fwd: Lagerstroemia thorelli

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia floribunda ? Group discussion at Lagerstroemia thorelli (google.com) -- Forwarded message - From: padirag

Re: [efloraofindia:404017] Swamy/New series/ID/4 - Lagerstroemia speciosa

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lagerstroemia floribunda ? Group discussion at Swamy/New series/ID/4 - Lagerstroemia speciosa (google.com) On Monday, May 10, 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:404018] Swamy/New series/ID/4 - Lagerstroemia speciosa

Thanks Gurucharan sir. On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 9:15 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lagerstroemia floribunda ? > > Group discussion at > Swamy/New series/ID/4 - Lagerstroemia speciosa (google.com) >

[efloraofindia:404019] Fwd: [itpmods:16078] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Tapas Chakrabarty Date: Sun, 24 Oct, 2021, 1:39 am Subject: Re: [itpmods:16078] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back To: itpmods No Garg ji, On my desktop, the new efi website is being denied access with Chrome browser while

[efloraofindia:404020] Fwd: [itpmods:16076] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Tapas Chakrabarty Date: Sat, 23 Oct, 2021, 9:55 pm Subject: Re: [itpmods:16076] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back To: itpmods Ditto. Additionally, Chrome browser is now blocking several websites useful for us, including

[efloraofindia:404020] Fwd: [itpmods:16078] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sun, 24 Oct, 2021, 9:39 am Subject: Re: [itpmods:16078] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back To: itpmods What is the message coming? -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun, 24 Oct, 2021, 1:39 am Tapas

[efloraofindia:404020] Fwd: [itpmods:16076] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sat, 23 Oct, 2021, 9:59 pm Subject: Re: [itpmods:16076] Fwd: BSI eFlora of India is back To: itpmods Thanks, Tapas ji, But I am using Chrome only for about a year and no issues for efi so far. -- With

[efloraofindia:404019] Fwd: [itpmods:16079] Fwd: Posted in 2016, published as a new species in 2021

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sun, 24 Oct, 2021, 9:38 am Subject: Re: [itpmods:16079] Fwd: Posted in 2016, published as a new species in 2021 To: itpmods Details also are there in the respective species page. -- With regards, J. M.

Re: [efloraofindia:404025] Lamiaceae (incl. Verbenaceae) Fortnight: Lamiaceae, Stachy sericea from Kullu-GSMAY106/109

Thanks Garg ji, I think you are right. On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 2:40:18 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > I feel more closer to images at Stachys floccosa > arther than > those at Stachys melissifolia >

  1   2   >