Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.1.0.CR3 release

2012-01-09 Thread Galder Zamarreño
Guys, how does CR3 today sound? On Jan 4, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: I'm on holiday on Friday (instead of Monday) so I'm hoping to finish all by CR3 stuff by tomorrow. So, if stuff is ready, maybe someone else can release on Friday instead of me? Cheers, On Jan 4,

Re: [infinispan-dev] Transactions and using synchronizations instead of XA - and ISPN-1284

2012-01-09 Thread Mircea Markus
On 7 Jan 2012, at 18:57, Manik Surtani wrote: After spending some hours on ISPN-1284, I think we have a few conceptual problems with using Synchronizations. Here is the topic branch containing my work: https://github.com/maniksurtani/infinispan/tree/t_1284 So far what I have done is:

Re: [infinispan-dev] 5.0 to 5.1 upgrade gotchas

2012-01-09 Thread Galder Zamarreño
Just did it: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1695 On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: On 9 Jan 2012, at 10:27, Galder Zamarreño wrote: ^, btw, this gotcha could be removed by making the parser deal with wakeUpInterval in eviction and passing it onto the expiration

Re: [infinispan-dev] 5.0 to 5.1 upgrade gotchas

2012-01-09 Thread Manik Surtani
On 9 Jan 2012, at 10:56, Mircea Markus wrote: Default transaction enlistment is now Synchronisation (vs XAResource). No it's not - I haven't submitted that pull request yet. The work is in my topic branch https://github.com/maniksurtani/infinispan/tree/t_1284 but I have concerns around

Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.1.0.CR3 release

2012-01-09 Thread Galder Zamarreño
Not on my side. I still need to check what 2LC looks with the fixes it needed which I'll do that today (w/ snapshot) or tomorrow (w/ CR3) On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: Yes please. Everyone, shall we defer our status update today for tomorrow, and instead focus on getting

Re: [infinispan-dev] 5.0 to 5.1 upgrade gotchas

2012-01-09 Thread Mircea Markus
On 9 Jan 2012, at 13:38, Manik Surtani wrote: On 9 Jan 2012, at 10:56, Mircea Markus wrote: Default transaction enlistment is now Synchronisation (vs XAResource). No it's not - I haven't submitted that pull request yet. The work is in my topic branch

Re: [infinispan-dev] Transactions and using synchronizations instead of XA - and ISPN-1284

2012-01-09 Thread Manik Surtani
On 9 Jan 2012, at 11:43, Mircea Markus wrote: On 9 Jan 2012, at 13:36, Manik Surtani wrote: On 9 Jan 2012, at 10:50, Mircea Markus wrote: On 7 Jan 2012, at 18:57, Manik Surtani wrote: After spending some hours on ISPN-1284, I think we have a few conceptual problems with using

Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.1.0.CR3 release

2012-01-09 Thread Dan Berindei
I still have some state transfer failures, I was hoping to fix them by this morning but I'm still having troubles so I might finish very late today. Dan On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote: Not on my side. I still need to check what 2LC looks with the fixes

Re: [infinispan-dev] Transactions and using synchronizations instead of XA - and ISPN-1284

2012-01-09 Thread Mircea Markus
On 9 Jan 2012, at 13:56, Manik Surtani wrote: On 9 Jan 2012, at 11:43, Mircea Markus wrote: On 9 Jan 2012, at 13:36, Manik Surtani wrote: On 9 Jan 2012, at 10:50, Mircea Markus wrote: On 7 Jan 2012, at 18:57, Manik Surtani wrote: After spending some hours on ISPN-1284, I

Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.1.0.CR3 release

2012-01-09 Thread Mircea Markus
On 9 Jan 2012, at 13:35, Manik Surtani wrote: Yes please. Everyone, shall we defer our status update today for tomorrow, and instead focus on getting this release out today? What time tomorrow? 1500 GMT? ___ infinispan-dev mailing list

Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.1.0.CR3 release

2012-01-09 Thread Manik Surtani
Yes On 9 Jan 2012, at 17:09, Mircea Markus wrote: On 9 Jan 2012, at 13:35, Manik Surtani wrote: Yes please. Everyone, shall we defer our status update today for tomorrow, and instead focus on getting this release out today? What time tomorrow? 1500 GMT?