Do you have the numbers for JDK 7 as well?
Radim
- Original Message -
| From: Manik Surtani msurt...@redhat.com
| To: infinispan -Dev List infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
| Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 4:35:53 AM
| Subject: [infinispan-dev] CHM or CHMv8?
|
| Guys,
|
| Based on some
+1 to make CHMv8 the default on JDK6 and JDK7
But I'm not convinced we should make it the default for JDK8 - even though
we don't know exactly what we're getting with the JDK's implementation.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:39 AM, David M. Lloyd david.ll...@redhat.comwrote:
On 04/18/2013 09:35 PM,
Why not. Only doubt I'd have is that other usages of the CHM are - I guess
- services registry and similar configuration tools, for which write
performance is irrelevant: your test measured puts, are there drawbacks on
gets or memory usage?
Recently you changed all (most?) CHM creations to use a
On 04/18/2013 02:26 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
I presume versioning (based on Vector Clocks) is now in master, as a
part of Pedro's work on total order?
No, I didn't add vector clocks.
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
On 04/05/2013 02:53 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
2. The SBL flips a switch in an interceptor (SplitBrainHandlerInterceptor?)
which switches the node to be read-only (reject invocations that change the
state of the local node) if it is in the smaller partition (newView.size
oldView.size /
Testing mixed read/write performance with capacity 10, keys 30,
concurrency level 32, threads 12, read:write ratio 99:1
Container CHM Ops/s 5178894.77 Gets/s 5127105.82 Puts/s
51788.95 HitRatio 86.23 Size 177848 stdDev 60896.42
Container CHMV8 Ops/s
On 19 April 2013 10:37, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing mixed read/write performance with capacity 10, keys 30,
concurrency level 32, threads 12, read:write ratio 99:1
Container CHM Ops/s 5178894.77 Gets/s 5127105.82 Puts/s
51788.95 HitRatio 86.23
On 19 April 2013 11:10, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org
wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:37, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing mixed read/write performance with capacity 10, keys 30,
Ok, I've created
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3022
In fact, we should also re-implement the BoundedConcurrentHashMap - the basis
for LIRS and LRU eviction algorithms - to use techniques similar to CHMv8
rather than the old segment-based approach.
On 19 Apr 2013, at 08:47, Dan Berindei wrote:
+1 to make CHMv8 the default on JDK6 and JDK7
+1
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
On 19 Apr 2013, at 13:16, Manik Surtani wrote:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3022
In fact, we should also re-implement the BoundedConcurrentHashMap - the basis
for LIRS and LRU eviction algorithms - to use techniques similar to CHMv8
rather than the old segment-based approach.
On 04/19/2013 05:17 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 19 April 2013 11:10, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org
wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:37, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing mixed read/write
On 04/19/2013 08:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 19 April 2013 13:52, David M. Lloyd david.ll...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/19/2013 05:17 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 19 April 2013 11:10, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sanne Grinovero
13 matches
Mail list logo
