On Feb 4, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 17:45, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 21 January 2014 13:37, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jan
20 % writes, 80 % reads
Radim
On 01/29/2014 03:20 PM, Paul Ferraro wrote:
What was the read/write ratio used for this test?
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:06 +0100, Radim Vansa wrote:
Hi Mircea,
I've ran a simple stress test [1] in dist mode with store as binary (not
enabled, enabled keys only,
On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
What's the point for these tests?
+1
On 20 Jan 2014 15:48, Radim Vansa rva...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, I have results for dist-udp-no-tx or local-no-tx modes on 8 nodes
(in local mode the nodes don't communicate,
On 21 January 2014 13:37, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
What's the point for these tests?
+1
To validate if storing the data in binary format yields better performance
than store is as a POJO.
That will
On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 21 January 2014 13:37, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
What's the point for these tests?
+1
To validate if storing the data in
Hi Radim,
I think 4 nodes with numOwner=2 is too small of a cluster. My calculus here[1]
points out that for numOwners=1, the performance benefits is only visible for
clusters having more than two nodes. Following a similar logic for numOwenrs=2,
the benefit would only be visible for clusters
Hi,
IMO, we should try the worst scenario: Local Mode + Single thread.
this will show us the highest impact in performance.
Cheers,
Pedro
On 01/20/2014 09:41 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
Hi Radim,
I think 4 nodes with numOwner=2 is too small of a cluster. My calculus
here[1] points out that
Would be interesting to see as well, though performance figure would not
include the network latency, hence it would not tell much about the benefit of
using this on a real life system.
On Jan 20, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Pedro Ruivo pe...@infinispan.org wrote:
IMO, we should try the worst scenario:
OK, I have results for dist-udp-no-tx or local-no-tx modes on 8 nodes
(in local mode the nodes don't communicate, naturally):
Dist mode: 3 % down for reads, 1 % for writes
Local mode: 19 % down for reads, 16 % for writes
Details in [1], ^ is for both keys and values stored as binary.
Radim
[1]
Hi Mircea,
I've ran a simple stress test [1] in dist mode with store as binary (not
enabled, enabled keys only, enabled values only, enabled both).
The difference is 2 % (with storeAsBinary enabled fully being slower).
Radim
[1]
10 matches
Mail list logo