There's something going on but I need to make a simpler repro case to fully
characterize it.
For one thing, the counts come out correct when there's an explicit upper
bound to the query.
The other thing is that the two data sets are sorted differently. The first
is chronological, the second is
Of course, these are the files with raw data:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6r5ebcyl8xv7y1x/data_for_influxdb.txt?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/h1num78wn9y54eu/data_for_influxdb_1.txt?dl=0
Il giorno giovedì 3 novembre 2016 18:27:03 UTC+1, Sean Beckett ha scritto:
> Without the raw data we can't
Without the raw data we can't recreate it. Can you upload the raw points to
a gist, perhaps?
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:46 AM, wrote:
> I tried to upload the same data in a different computer with influxdb
> v0.13 installed and all works.
>
> I think is an issue of influx
I tried to recreate the issue.
I uploaded data in database from only one source
(matricola_contatore=1012-008-5506) with two different files
(data_for_influxdb.txt and data_for_influxdb_1.txt). In this files there are
some points with identical measurement name, tag, timestamp and value, as
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:57 AM, wrote:
> Hi all,
> after upgrading influxdb from 0.13 to 1.0 I notice some problems when I
> insert data with identical measurement name, tag and timestamp writing
> multiple points from different files: with old version the points were
>