[influxdb] Re: Setting up SSL with InfluxDB

2016 Update: Setting up SSL can very easily be done with LetsEncrypt. Please see this post: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/influxdb/Xf8fLoRIJXc/POJ00_l2AwAJ -- Remember to include the InfluxDB version number with all issue reports --- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [influxdb] Re: InfluxDB & letsencrypt

On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 10:49:37 AM UTC-7, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > I've installed the nightly from the centos rpm, I don't know where the logs > are being redirected to honestly. On Ubuntu 15.04+, logs go to the newfangled journald, and you can display them with: journalctl -u

[influxdb] Re: Aggregating samples when interval in GROUP BY time() is not the same as metric resolution

Running 1.0 and Grafana 3.1.1. -- Remember to include the InfluxDB version number with all issue reports --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InfluxDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[influxdb] Aggregating samples when interval in GROUP BY time() is not the same as metric resolution

Hi, I think the answer to this question is "use CQ", but it seems like an obvious use case so maybe I've overlooked a better solution: I have series collected every minute detailing the number of users per service per region. Let's say the measurement is called online_users with tags service

Re: [influxdb] Retention Policy

As long as you only have hundreds or low thousands of users it should be okay. Each database incurs a fixed filesystem and RAM cost, but they aren't very high. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Mathias Herberts wrote: > Thanks, the 'database per user' approach seems

Re: [influxdb] Re: influx 0.13 cli connecting to a remote 0.12.2 server

On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 3:50:22 PM UTC-4, Clayton Dukes wrote: > Scratch that. I had upgraded the server, but had not restarted it. A simple > "service influxdb restart" resolved it :) > > > > > > __ > > Clayton Dukes >

Re: [influxdb] Multiple points not getting written to influxdb

Thanks Sean for the clarification.I shall try with millisecond/nanosecond time stamp. On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 9:11:09 AM UTC+5:30, Sean Beckett wrote: > > When no explicit timestamp is supplied, InfluxDB applies the same > timestamp to all points in the batch. Since all points belong

Re: [influxdb] Re: influx 0.13 cli connecting to a remote 0.12.2 server

On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 3:50:22 PM UTC-4, Clayton Dukes wrote: > Scratch that. I had upgraded the server, but had not restarted it. A simple > "service influxdb restart" resolved it :) > This solution worked for me as well after few hours of useless attempts. > > > > >

Re: [influxdb] BUG? bug in rc1, not in v13. Duplicate and erroneous data returned. Anyone else getting this ?

#7263 added (belatedly) on gitbhub 7263 https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb/issues/7263 cheers, Ian On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 05:28:56 UTC+10, Sean Beckett wrote: > > This is not an issue I recall seeing before. Please open a bug report on > the repo:

Re: [influxdb] Database structure

I figured it out later in the night. Thank you! - Will On Thursday, 8 September 2016 09:13:44 UTC-7, Sean Beckett wrote: > > SELECT LAST(value) FROM testDB GROUP BY pv > > Please review > http://docs.influxdata.com/influxdb/v0.13/query_language/data_exploration/ > for more on how to use

Re: [influxdb] Retention Policy

Thanks, the 'database per user' approach seems indeed the most appropriate. On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:44:30 PM UTC+2, Sean Beckett wrote: > > Retention policies are enforced based on the timestamp of the point, not > when the point was written. There is no way in the system to drop

[influxdb] Re: write failed for shard 35: max series per database exceeded:

I have change the way I write the data. I have reduce the number of fields. It's clearly better. Thanks -- Remember to include the InfluxDB version number with all issue reports --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InfluxDB" group. To unsubscribe from

[influxdb] Re: time difference between first and last entry in windowed stream

I have pasted an example below but it might not do what you expect. The elapsed time will almost always be 10m since that is the period of your window, except for the first 10m where it will still be filling up. Kapacitor measures time based on the data it sees. This means the window will not

[influxdb] Re: Multiple SNMP input plugins for collecting different data for different hosts

Hi Matt, can you provide your full config file, the exact commands you are running, and the exact output you are getting from each of those. you can paste them here or put them in a gist: https://gist.github.com/ thanks, Cam On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 10:24:39 AM UTC+1, Matt Baker wrote:

Re: [influxdb] Re: are there any logs

Also https://docs.influxdata.com/influxdb/v1.0/administration/013_vs_1/#influxdb-logging-change for this and other changes. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Sean Beckett wrote: > To comply with systemd convention, InfluxDB no longer redirects to >

Re: [influxdb] Re: are there any logs

To comply with systemd convention, InfluxDB no longer redirects to /var/log/influxdb/influxd.log on systemd OSes. See https://docs.influxdata.com/influxdb/v1.0/administration/logs/#systemd for more. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:35 AM, wrote: > On Friday, November 8, 2013 at

Re: [influxdb] Constantly some CPU load on 0.9

Even if there is no external write or query load, InfluxDB is writing statistics about itself back to itself. Any configured continuous queries will also require resources. In addition, there are housekeeping chores related to Raft and file compaction that can cause a low steady-state level of CPU

[influxdb] Re: kapacitor: panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference

Can you create an issue at https://github.com/influxdata/kapacitor/issues/new and include the new stack trace using version 1.0? Thanks On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 3:52:56 AM UTC-6, Jun Zhang wrote: > > > @nathanielc , I have upgraded to v1.0.0, > but still

[influxdb] Re: write failed for shard 35: max series per database exceeded:

Yes, it's more than possible but we also a huge source of information with many assets (hundred of switchs with hundred of port, collect each 3 minutes on many country/dc/entity. Thanks for the release not, I have set it in the conf. It's working now. -- Remember to include the InfluxDB

[influxdb] Re: write failed for shard 35: max series per database exceeded:

Do you know how to change this option ? -- Remember to include the InfluxDB version number with all issue reports --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InfluxDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[influxdb] Re: write failed for shard 35: max series per database exceeded:

My concern is that I have reached the limit in one week only. -- Remember to include the InfluxDB version number with all issue reports --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InfluxDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[influxdb] Re: write failed for shard 35: max series per database exceeded:

Hello, Yes -- Remember to include the InfluxDB version number with all issue reports --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InfluxDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[influxdb] Re: write failed for shard 35: max series per database exceeded:

Running the 1.0 GA? There is a config option to increase the max series. On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 10:02:42 AM UTC-4, picaud...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello, > > I'am not able any more to write data in my database because it seems that > I have reached the number of series > > Sep 09

[influxdb] write failed for shard 35: max series per database exceeded:

Hello, I'am not able any more to write data in my database because it seems that I have reached the number of series Sep 09 15:54:46 influxd[30433]: [write] 2016/09/09 15:54:46 write failed for shard 35: max series per database exceeded: Here are some information

[influxdb] time difference between first and last entry in windowed stream

I'm trying to get the time difference between the first and the last item within a window of 10 minutes using kapacitor. E.g. var vids = stream |from() .measurement('control') .groupBy('vid') |window() .period(10m)

[influxdb] Re: are there any logs

On Friday, November 8, 2013 at 4:51:57 AM UTC-8, stefand...@gmail.com wrote: > are there any logs for influxdb? where would errors be printed? As of Influx v1.0.0, I can't find any logs in /var/log/influxdb, or in /opt/. `service influxdb status` shows the service is dead, but no indication as

[influxdb] Re: kapacitor: panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference

@nathanielc , I have upgraded to v1.0.0, but still panic! On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:27:41 AM UTC+8, nath...@influxdb.com wrote: > > This issue has been fixed in the latest version. > https://github.com/influxdata/kapacitor/pull/510 >

[influxdb] Multiple SNMP input plugins for collecting different data for different hosts

Hi, I was after some guidance about having multiple SNMP input plugins. The reason is that I have lots of different types of machines that I would like to collect different OIDs for. I figured maybe the best way was to have separate .conf files under telegraf.d but it while they seemed to

[influxdb] Constantly some CPU load on 0.9

Hello, We have a server running InfluxDB v0.9 and "top" is showing the "influxdb" process always has some CPU load typically between 5-10%. If I understand top output correctly, this is just for a single core so not a huge load. But still would be nice to know what might be causing this.