Sorry about that. Strangely enough rebooting the
linux box seems to have fixed the problem.
I think the problem was this:
* I freshly installed linux. $CVSROOT was not set.
* Then I booted the machine and defined and exported
$CVSROOT in shell command line.
* Also added 'export
Philip == Philip Lijnzaad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Philip Oops, wrong. You also have to change pretty much all the
Philip lines that contain just the revision number ('3.x' in your
Philip case) to 2.x, and you also have to change all the lines
Philip that look like ``next
Guy == Guy Scharf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guy Sau Dan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For your case, I think you'll be better of saving the binary
files with names containing version numbers (manually
assigned). There is no space lost with this method (since
there is no
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Larry Jones wrote:
[...]
directory and the user you're running as doesn't have sufficient
permission to create it. The easiest fix is to just run cvs init as a
user who does have permission to write in $CVSROOT/CVSROOT.
Ok, I've done this, but no there are
James Knowles writes:
I've struggled a bit to figure out how to best set up CVS to handle these. I
can create a zillion projects under a single CVSROOT location, but that very
quickly gets messy. However, it does have the nice benefit of only one
$CVSROOT environment variable.
Which is
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mark wrote:
maybe, restore the repository from backup, prior to the command run.
There is just the daily backup of the repository -- I do not want to
redo the changes of the last day...
I suppose you could try and produce a huge recursive context diff of the last
Yes, the way Windows handles file dates is weird, but it's CVS that needs to
be fixed! The timestamp written to the entries file is supposedly UTC, for
any given 'real' time, this should be the same whether it is currently DST
or not, unfortunately such is not the case. Determining if a
Title: CVS diff --exclude excluded
In the CVS (1.11.1pl1) source, the GNU option '--exclude' is
explicitly omitted from the command line parser data structures
with a comment saying it did not seem applicable for CVS.
Well, I think I have a need, and I wonder if there are any
alternatives
You can use the CVSROOT/modules file to have aliases
Another feature I forgot about. CVS is just too flexible. ;-) (just
kidding!)
More importantly (in a multi-user enviroment at least) for different access
rights/policies. The way I look at repositories is as a unit of
I work for lehman
brothers. We are going to be using cvs to set up our development tree for
my department. We had a meeting yesterday and were discussing how to do
branching. I explained that you branch a whole tree not just branching
files. I was trying to explain that you keep one branch
I checkout a file from cvs, a made some changes but them i took care
that this changes are bad, what must i do in this situation if i like
to recover the version of the CVS server?
A checkout? or
Delete the file from my repository and them a checkout
or another...
Thanks
[ On Tuesday, October 30, 2001 at 14:37:22 (-0600), Lance Stephens wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Is it a good idea to use CVS for this??
The Pros:
--- you don't have to rebuild your execs. But this is not really a Pro?
No, it's not really any advantage -- any method of storing your
executables in
I've made a patch that logs remote hostname in history, instead of just
remote.
Maybe it's not portable to Win32. Maybe someone can help me with that?
Comments?
--
/Peter Åstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- main.c.org Fri Apr 27 21:57:23 2001
+++ main.c Wed Oct 31 19:41:00 2001
@@
Lasterra writes:
I checkout a file from cvs, a made some changes but them i took care
that this changes are bad, what must i do in this situation if i like
to recover the version of the CVS server?
You can use update -C to overwrite your locally modified file with a
new copy from the
James Knowles writes:
What was previous organized into a hierarchy now needs to be
flattened_through_very_long_project_names.
Why? CVS is happy to work with hierarchies. Perhaps you should explain
your situation in a bit more detail.
-Larry Jones
It's not denial. I'm just very selective
Harry Putnam writes:
$ cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/cvsroot login
Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/usr/local/cvsroot
CVS password: password
cvs [login aborted]: recv() from server cvs.gnus.org: Connection reset by peer
Either the server is misconfigured or
Hi,
I have set
export CVSROOT='', which include my user name and
the directory of the files which I need.
but when I use:
cvs login
and input my password, it shows:
cvs [login aborted]: connect to magnolia.metla.fi:2401
failed: No route to host.
what is the matter?
Thank you.
I might be being more thick than usual today,
but shouldn't the following two examples
essentially produce the same result?...
cvs up -jrev1 -jrev2 file
cvs diff -rrev1 -rrev2 file patch
patch file patch
__
Andy Baker
Prepay Development, One2One
-Mensaje original-
De:
Enviado el: Martes 30 de Octubre de 2001 11:11
Para: 'Info CVS Mailinglist'
Asunto: Anybody any idea why initial revision number is 2.1 when ever
was 1.1 ??
Importancia: Alta
Hi All´:
Any idea on the subject ???.
THANKS IN ADVANCE
Miaoer Lu wrote:
cvs [login aborted]: connect to magnolia.metla.fi:2401
failed: No route to host.
what is the matter?
Your machine cannot find a route to magnolia.metla.fi. You should get the same
response when you try to ping the host. This has nothing to do with CVS.
-Matt
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Baker wrote:
I might be being more thick than usual today,
but shouldn't the following two examples
essentially produce the same result?...
cvs up -jrev1 -jrev2 file
cvs diff -rrev1 -rrev2 file patch
patch file patch
The patch program does not
Mark Hewitt writes:
In the CVS (1.11.1pl1) source, the GNU option '--exclude' is
explicitly omitted from the command line parser data structures
with a comment saying it did not seem applicable for CVS.
That's because CVS only diffs two files at a time -- the recursion is
handled by CVS,
Hi Brian.
When I had a look for it on Sunday morning, I found the following
mappings (from memory):
cvs.cvshome.org 127.0.0.9
www.cvshome.org 127.0.0.15
That's totally bizarre, and I can't explain it.
That's what I thought, but the mappings were consistent over
From: Jonathan H Lundquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:10 PM
Yes, the way Windows handles file dates is weird, but it's
CVS that needs to
be fixed!
WinCVS (and cvsnt) had to be fixed because Windows is broken and will never
be fixed.
Full documentation
I'm trying to get the latest Windows client but the links
http://ftp.cvshome.org/win32/cvs1-11-1p1.zip and http://ftp.cvshome.org/
both redirect me to http://www.cvshome.org/ - is this a server issue?
Burt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
I've been using CVS for a little over a year now, and while it's an
improvement over previous SC tools (don't ask) there are a couple of issues
that I expected to be addressed by CVS that I can't really seem to get working
right. I don't know if my expectations are off, or I don't know what I'm
On 31 Oct 2001 17:59:20 -0800
dale a schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that was all I wanted to do, i.e. change the branch then get those changes
back into the mainline, it's not too bad. However, if I want to synch with
the mainline, then the next time I do a synch or check it into the
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I wondered if there is a way to force verbosity, where the negotiation
get printed to tty or something similar so that I can see what is the
problem. The normal flags for that kind of stuff -[vV] are taken for
other things and I see no `debug'
If I'm working on a file and then realize I want to discard my changes I can
use cvs update -C to get a clean copy. Using cvs 1.11 win32 command line
client, this command doesn't work if someone else has committed a newer
version of the file in the mean time.
for example;
cvs update -C
Hi,
We are implementing a restriction in our organisation wherein only one
person can put his modifications into cvs . This system is too restrictive
because people working across different branches need to wait until someone
else releases the cvs. Can we have some mechanism to lock or safegaurd
maybe you can try a tcp forwarding thingy.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/tcp_forward/
and tweak it to dump the transaction.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Harry Putnam
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL
Take charge of your career by utilizing www.marblejar.com. We offer IT
professionals like you all of the services you require to find the most
challenging positions in the IT industry. * $500 Signing bonus
when you get job through us* Dedicated recruiters to help you identify the
best job
32 matches
Mail list logo
