id 1BYoES-00079g-Mv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:46:16 -0400
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
id 1BYoDg-00079b-SF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:45:28 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam
Well, any chance of a binary requires a C compiler
and I couldn't tell from the GCC doc contents
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.0/gcc/
which is the right hardware model.
You've given us what I assume are system and OS
names. Can you translate that into an CPU make
and model? Check the GCC
> I thought COBOL died with Y2K, how much COBOL development still goes on?
They're not called legacy systems for nothing :-) Seriously, most large corporations
still have a ton of COBOL apps. We're in the process of migrating to Java and open
systems, but it'll be a few years (decades?) until
Are you kidding? One of the bases for the software boom of the '90s
was to fix all that non-compliant COBOL code. Do you think all those
old-timers came out of retirement to do porting?
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought COBOL died with Y2K, how much COBOL development still goe
I thought COBOL died with Y2K, how much COBOL development still goes on?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kyle Adams
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CVS binary for Unisys MCP
Does anyone know of a binary
Does anyone know of a binary (or even a successful build) of the CVS client for
Unisys' MCP operating system? We would like to look at the possibility of version
controlling our mainframe COBOL code and need to know if our mainframe can directly
interact with the CVS repository.
My background
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 09:41, Derek Robert Price wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tom Copeland wrote:
>
> >1.11.17 release is mirrored here, along with a source and i386 binary
> >RPM:
> >
> >http://cougaar.org/frs/?group_id=7
>
>
> If you'd like to mirror your binari
On 2004-06-11 08:35-0700 Conrad T. Pino wrote:
> > Anybody heard anything about the mother ship?
>
> Looks like the mother ship has returned.
Yeh, and with https warp power too. :)
Fred og solskinn,
Ãyvind A. Holm
-
cat /dev/urandom >SCO
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 08:30:31AM -0700, Abhinandan Jain wrote:
>Perhaps "bug" was too strong a term. My point is that the longstanding
>behavior of CVS (several years and at least until 1.11.4) has been to
>accept such legal variants of relative paths. I am not sure why this has
>changed and whet
> Anybody heard anything about the mother ship?
Looks like the mother ship has returned.
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Perhaps "bug" was too strong a term. My point is that the longstanding
behavior of CVS (several years and at least until 1.11.4) has been to
accept such legal variants of relative paths. I am not sure why this has
changed and whether the change is intentional or a side-effect of some
other mod to C
It looks to me like your script is broken. The /./ in the middle of the
path although legal does nothing. Why not fix the script?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Abhinandan Jain
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2004-06-11 07:18-0700 Conrad T. Pino wrote:
> Anybody heard anything about the mother ship?
>
> >tracert www.cvshome.org
> [...]
> 1331 ms31 ms32 ms fw.sjc.collab.net [64.125.132.30]
> 14 *** Request timed out.
> 15 *** Request tim
Anybody heard anything about the mother ship?
>tracert www.cvshome.org
Tracing route to www.cvshome.org [64.125.132.233]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.41.1
2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 66.166.200.185
332 ms31 ms31 ms 172.31.255.253
431
14 matches
Mail list logo
