Re: CVS For VMS

2001-07-10 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Martin Eismann [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/09/2001 10:01:10 PM

Re: Upgrading CMS

2001-05-24 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Even though this is not a CMS mailing list. Try this from the 'Ask the Wizard' site at compaq: http://www.openvms.compaq.com/wizard/wiz_0170.html The Question is: i WOULD lIKE to upgrade from cms version 3.5-2 to 3.9 the convert utility enables convert from v2 to v3

Re: $Name$ Keyword does not expand

2001-04-25 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Try using the 'export' command. The idea, I think, is that with a checkout you might be temped to modify the code thus invalidating the Name keyword, whereas with an export it is explicit that you should not furthur modify the code. Rex. Markus Grunwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/25/2001

Re: CVS from RCS?

2001-04-16 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Id like to add that if I remember correctly, it is possible to create RCS files that will not be usable in CVS. For one example, if you have revisions of the form 1.x.y.z then is it not the case that these will confuse CVS? Rex. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) on 04/16/2001 11:41:09 AM

Re: -t/-f in cvswrappers

2001-04-13 Thread Rex_Jolliff
DAve Goodrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/13/2001 12:03:25 PM

Re: Issues with raising the 'floor' in CVS

2001-02-15 Thread Rex_Jolliff
This means that the data wasn't checked out of CVS in the first place. Importcheckout or add the files before attempting a checkin. This points out an weakness (or at least a perceived one) in CVS in my opinion. There isn't an easy way to add a new 'module' to the repository. Either you use

RE: cvs add --new

2001-02-15 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Actually I comment was meant to point out a percieved flaw in CVS. When I show developers CVS in the environment that I work, putting new projects into CVS is always a place that they see weakness in CVS as they either have to pretend they are their own vendor, or use the top level dir

RE: Multiple Repositories on a server

2001-02-08 Thread Rex_Jolliff
just use two --allow-root command line parameters Rex. ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs

Re: Viewing and Committing Older Revision in WinCVS

2001-02-01 Thread Rex_Jolliff

RE: Problems with CVS version 1.10.8 on Windows 2000

2001-01-31 Thread Rex_Jolliff
My guess would be that the colon in the pathname is being interpreted as a field separator. Try the following: cvs -d :local:\\z\iil\iswp\data\apt\ISIS\repository get trycvs "Reinstein, Shlomo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/30/2001 10:29:44 PM

Re: -kb

2001-01-29 Thread Rex_Jolliff
I think the file should contain regex's not file wildcards, and I believe that the first line to be matched is used, so probably something like the following: --- .*\.[Hh][Tt][Mm][Ll] -k 'v' .* -k 'b' Rob Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/27/2001 12:40:01 AM

Re: Question on disabling automatic merges

2001-01-25 Thread Rex_Jolliff
If you mean that you want to stop a developer from taking an old copy of a file and checking it in over the top of the current version of the file, there is a set of scripts in contrib directory that will facilitate this. They will require you to have $Id$ markers at the top of every file

Re: Tags in keyword substitutions

2001-01-23 Thread Rex_Jolliff
I should point out that $Name$ only works if you checkout or export based on a tag. But, this is the only way you should be building release candidates anyway. Rex. ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: file access

2001-01-10 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Guus Writes: PiAgLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gIEZyb206IGluZm8tY3ZzLWFkbWluQGdu dS5vcmcgDQo+ICBbbWFpbHRvOmluZm8tY3ZzLWFkbWluQGdudS5vcmddT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mDQo+ [...] Ya dont say. Rex. ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CVS Problem

2001-01-04 Thread Rex_Jolliff
You Wrote: I'm having trouble using CVS. I will check out files, edit them, and commit them. It gives them a new version number (no error comes up), but the files are not updated. If I go to the CVS repository and look at the file there, it's the old version not the one I just modified. Has

RE: Multiple developers in one work area

2001-01-02 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Tony Wrote: I've a new CVS user but an old hand at DEC's CMS code management system. The latter was very good about allowing multiple people in one area. CVS isn't so strong there. In my opinion this is basically bunk. CMS is roughly equivalent to RCS, and in the same vein supports the

Re: revision numbers

2000-12-12 Thread Rex_Jolliff
That source file seems to have been passed around between several development efforts that use RCS or CVS for version control. Each time the file was Actually, from the log it looks like someone in the same effort renamed it a couple times. each time it was renamed the revision was reset

Re: incorrect return code on vms...

2000-12-04 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Larry Jones wrote: I don't think diff-utils is interested in running on non-Unix/Posix systems. CVS is (although it doesn't quite succeed just yet). We use CVS under VMS here and it works fine, with the exception of the release command, but DELETE works just fine as a replacement. Rex.

Re: CVSIGNORE won't ignore .conf files

2000-12-04 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Richard Ponton wrote: I tried using both .cvsignore and the CVSIGNORE environment variable. If you are importing, checkout CVSROOT/cvswrappers first and edit to add: *.[Cc][Oo][Nn][Ff] -k 'kkv' Rex. ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: No space left on device error during cvs status/update

2000-11-01 Thread Rex_Jolliff
You write: Pretty darn sure. I checked and double-checked and triple-checked and then had other smarter people check for me: Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 962582 830683 3564996%/ assuming /tmp is part of this

Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place

2000-08-04 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Kalle Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/03/2000 05:03:47 PM

Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place

2000-08-04 Thread Rex_Jolliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) on 08/04/2000 10:24:28 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Not true. if there is a subdirectory that contains files from a different repository than its parent and a recursive cvs command is executed from the parent, the client will not switch repositories

Re: CVS'ing home directory files; CVS in place

2000-08-04 Thread Rex_Jolliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) on 08/04/2000 11:33:55 AM wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Even if this is the case I would be wary of using this ability. Why? It has worked from quite some time and there are tests in sanity.sh to verify it. If I cannot recreate the structure easily

Re: Sorting tags

2000-07-27 Thread Rex_Jolliff
This theory does not hold if more than one tag is on the latest revision of a file. It also does not indicate the latest tag across all branches. It does not appear that the date of a tag is stored in the ,v file, so it is probably not possible to always determine the latest tag. Rex.

Re: Branch/Tag list

2000-07-13 Thread Rex_Jolliff
cvs history -H -a will at least show all modules that have been tagged. Perhaps that is enough. Rex. "Kuykendall, PR Paul (8807)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/13/2000 02:01:54 PM To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Rex Jolliff/YM/RWDOE) Subject: Branch/Tag list

Re: CVS support for /cvs rm -rf/???

2000-07-10 Thread Rex_Jolliff
If you're client is running under unix, you can do something like: find . -prune CVS -type f -exec rm \{} ; cvs remove \{} \; Rex. Shawn Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/07/2000 08:59:13 AM To: CVS ListServe [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Rex Jolliff/YM/RWDOE) Subject: CVS support

RE: .trunk patch refinement

2000-06-19 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Mike Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/19/2000 09:12:42 AM To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED], "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Rex Jolliff/YM/RWDOE) Subject: RE: ".trunk" patch refinement -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: loginfo question

2000-06-12 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Only the first match gets executed, How about: # ^test/dir1* bla "%s" olaf, john ^test* bla "%s" john Rex. Chris Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/2000 06:14:35 PM Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Olaf Meding' [EMAIL PROTECTED], info-cvs mailing

Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5?

2000-04-18 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Lenny Foner [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/18/2000 08:36:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Rex Jolliff/YM/RWDOE) Subject: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Of course, it's entirely likely that

Re: status feature

2000-04-13 Thread Rex_Jolliff
cvs co -c will give a list of module names. But you must define the module in CVSROOT/modules in order for it to show up on this list. Rex. Dave Sherohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/13/2000 10:01:10 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Gersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL

Re: About buttons....

2000-02-21 Thread Rex_Jolliff
Richard Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/18/2000 11:20:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CVS-II Discussion Mailing List) cc:(bcc: Rex Jolliff/YM/RWDOE) Subject: Re: About buttons [ On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 17:38:32 (CST), Win32 M$ wrote: ] Subject: About buttons

Re: Enhancement suggestion

2000-02-15 Thread Rex_Jolliff
I dont think you understood the request. The keyword replacement was desired, but in such a way as to not expand the field. ie: $Author: williams $ can become $Author: rexj$ but $Author: rexj $ would become $Author: will $ Rex. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Sander) on 02/15/2000