on Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2001 00:59 you wrote:
What about the capabilities of commitinfo, loginfo, taginfo. I would
imagine those must be limited on an NT server, since it won't have all
the same commands available. (I'm just guessing though, as I've never
run it on NT. It's something you
Mathias Meyer wrote:
on Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2001 00:59 you wrote:
What about the capabilities of commitinfo, loginfo, taginfo. I would
imagine those must be limited on an NT server, since it won't have all
the same commands available. (I'm just guessing though, as I've never
run it on
on Dienstag, 12. Juni 2001 11:23 you wrote:
Um, I don't have much experience with the Windows CVS server, but the
Windows filesystem is case insensitive and Linux's isn't. Linux
is
more reliable in general. More development work goes on on CVS
servers on UNIX systems, so bugs should show
What about the capabilities of commitinfo, loginfo, taginfo. I would
imagine those must be limited on an NT server, since it won't have all
the same commands available. (I'm just guessing though, as I've never
run it on NT. It's something you should investigate though).
Also, what about the more
Hi everybody,
I would like to know any disadvanteges or advantages of CVS running
with the ntserver-method on a win2000 box.
The admin in my compony does not really want to run it on Linux because
of backup problems (he uses Seagate Backup Exec with that cool Agent
Software) and because of
