--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ On Sunday, August 3, 2003 at 20:30:04 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
Greg A. Woods writes:
It seems to me that it would be most logical and most elegant to simply
use the combination of '-r' and '-D
[ On Sunday, August 3, 2003 at 20:38:37 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
If you think that this is obvious, then Heisenberg requires that
someone else would think that the obvious response would be to
diff the latest version on the specied branch
Greg A. Woods writes:
It seems to me that it would be most logical and most elegant to simply
use the combination of '-r' and '-D' when a date on a particular branch
is desired:
cvs [r]diff -r branch-1 -D date-1 -r branch-2 -D date-2
Unfortunately, it's impossibly ambiguous unless
[ On Sunday, August 3, 2003 at 20:30:04 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
Greg A. Woods writes:
It seems to me that it would be most logical and most elegant to simply
use the combination of '-r' and '-D' when a date on a particular branch
I will be out of the office until August 11. Thank you, Heather
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Mark D. Baushke
Does the command:
cvs diff -r B_PROD -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
work for you?
Not really:
$ cvs diff -r B_PROD -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
cvs diff: koucopy.sh was removed, no comparison available
-Original Message-
From: Mark D. Baushke
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Mark D. Baushke
Does
Hi Michael,
Okay. It appears that the 'feature' of being able to mix tags and dates
needs to be resolved and introduced into the trunk version of cvs as it
is not yet present in the cvshome.org version of cvs.
-- Mark
___
Info-cvs mailing
-Original Message-
From: Mark D. Baushke
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
Okay. It appears that the 'feature' of being able to mix tags
and dates
needs to be resolved
Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original Message-
From: Mark D. Baushke
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
Okay. It appears that the 'feature
[ On Thursday, July 31, 2003 at 07:47:09 (-0700), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
I think that the -D timestamp is documented as doing timestamps on the
trunk rather than a branch at present. The right thing to do is probably
to either extend the -r
[ On Thursday, July 31, 2003 at 16:36:09 (+0200), Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 wrote: ]
Subject: RE: Strange diff behavior on branch
And I would expect diff to use the sticky branch tag by
default. The other cvs commands need an explicit -r HEAD
to refer to the trunk.
Yes, cvs diff should
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ On Thursday, July 31, 2003 at 07:47:09 (-0700), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
I think that the -D timestamp is documented as doing timestamps on the
trunk rather than a branch at present. The right thing
Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not having seen a single reply I try again and ask:
Does the command:
cvs diff -r B_PROD -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
work for you?
Right now you are asking to compare the mainline version of 16-jul-2003
to the checked out copy and cvs
I have a file that was initially added on a branch. If I
do a diff based on a date I get this:
$ cvs diff -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
cvs diff: koucopy.sh is a new entry, no comparison available
$ cvs stat koucopy.sh
===
File:
15 matches
Mail list logo
