"Laird Nelson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So your commit/loginfo line would look like this:
# example
DEFAULT /your/script/here $USER
Any ideas, then, why the following line in loginfo does not send out
any email?
DEFAULT $CVSROOT/CVSROOT/log_accum.pl -u $USER -m jesse %s
I
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Oliver Fischer wrote:
I tent to ignore them. Since they can produced automatically, I
regard them as temporary files.
And this is the crux, that you can produce them automatically.
Alas, this is a bit of a problem. In that there are hundreds of
the @##$! things. And as I
hallo,
my repository is located on our file server. this directory is mounted
on other computer. in passwd I've defined users, which can access the
repository:
rafcio:%/%/4F:cvsuser
all files should be write as cvsuser. but all users which are defined in
passwd can change files in CVSROOT
Hi.
I wanted to have a similar scenario, but should I consider this:
One potential problem is that when you check out the modules with these
artificial paths, which don't exist in the repository, the ./CVS/Repository
entries in the intermediate directories will point to CVSROOT/EmptyDir.
Is there any mechanism to extend cvsignore to match questionable files and
then use something like the "file" command to peek inside them to decide
whether to ignore them or not?
This seems doable. A quick hack would be to change ign_name to take a
new parameter:
int am_server
Change
David Martin writes:
Suppose, as before, my directory structure is simply a -- b -- c. Assume that I
have specified a line in "commitinfo" for a, one for b, and one for c. The line
for a calls prog_a, the line for b calls prog_b, and similarly for c.
From the top level, I call cvs
John Carter wrote:
Alas, this is a bit of a problem. In that there are hundreds of
the @##$! things. And as I have found out, people tend to get a bit lax
about booking files in. (I found out the hard way, by moving from RCS to
CVS and finding nothing worked. People had been too lazy /
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:59:46PM -0700, W. Reilly Cooley, Esq. wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:25:06PM -0700, Matthew Berney wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but what is the Cederqvist? Is it a user manual, some
arcane CVS lore? I have seen many references to it here on the CVS digest.
I am having problems connecting from jCVS to CVS. These are the errors I
am getting for rsh type connection.
If you have any suggestions, please suggest !
.rhosts is set
CVSClient.processCVSRequest
Command:noop
Repository:
From: Eric Siegerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 11:24 AM
Technical terminology is one thing; jargon for its own sake risks
the charge of willful obscurantism.
This document is sometimes called "Cederqvist," sometimes "the manual,"
sometimes "Version
At 2000-09-12 14:24 -0400, Eric Siegerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, I'm glad to have someone finally confirm my theory that
"The Cederqvist" and cvs.info are one and the same -- and I've
been using CVS since version 1.2 or 1.3.
Technical terminology is one thing; jargon for its own
I find this all very amusing because when I suggested that
we should have an FAQ (which would include answers to
questions like this) I was told by the loud, obnoxious
old-timers that we don't need an FAQ - All the answers
are in The Cederqvist.
But what if you don't know what The Cederqvist
Hello
I currently use CVS for our projects - we have 9 modules, about 9300
files, close to 80Mbytes in total (mostly .jsp and .java files). We don't
do much in-house development, but quite a bit of bug fixing and minor
improvements.
Most of the new development is done offsite for us - the code
Hi,
I'm on a UNIX machine and would like to see a CVS log
between two dates. Cederqvist (I like referring to this documentation
this way :) claims that I can do something like:
cvs log -d 2000-01-202000-09-01 MyFile.cc
csh doesn't like this. If I try back-slashing the '' I get something
weird
Isn't this the case with _EVERY_ board/list?
My conclusion is that the old-timers want to have their
obscure lingo so that they can feel superior. They can
then separate themselves from the masses while at the
same time, still feel good by professing to want to help
the down-trodden with
- Original Message -
From: Craig Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: What is Cederqvist?
I find this all very amusing because when I suggested that
we should have an FAQ (which would include answers to
questions
Enclosing the entire '2000-01-202000-09-01' argument in single quotes should
work.
tom
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, David Ratner wrote:
Hi,
I'm on a UNIX machine and would like to see a CVS log
between two dates. Cederqvist (I like referring to this documentation
this way :) claims that I can do
In my opinion, referring to a standard document by the last name of its author
is not snooty or superior. It would be annoying to have to list the full title
and author in every reference.
An entry should be added to a faq for this question. That way, people new to
CVS could instantly find out
18 matches
Mail list logo
