to use pam_ldap to authenticate the cvs-users)
I don't worry about it.
Make sure nothing but CVS is on the machine, and users won't have access to
anything they don't already have access to.
No additional risk.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We
.
As an SCM person, I look upon a change such as this with agast. It's
equivalent to outdating a version of a file that has a bug in it. You
simply don't do that!
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan
lie. That's
how they were checked in. I may not like them, but I'll leave them be.
It's like removing old versions that checked in bugs. Just something you
don't do.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow
://www.cvshome.org/cyclic/cvs/dev-diff-hyphen.txt
Someday I should really write that sanity check and resubmit the patch.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty
, complaining about unchanged files is a bug, not an
undocumented feature.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
that the protocol will work either way, so if it bothers enough
people, make it a run time configuration option.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty
been mod'd) to find out what has changed.
This scenario is precisely why CVS was invented.
In the manual, look up stuff on vendor branches for recommended
procedures.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan
put
each item on it's own line, which could reduce conflicts.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Derrek Leute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *could* run a mirrored repository on my laptop and then merge that with
the primary repository when I return. But I don't know how to do that
Isn't this what cvsup is for?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED
-m merged oldbranch onto main
In the second case, do something like:
cvs up -A
cvs up -j oldbranch
# do fixups here
cvs commit -m merged oldbranch onto main
cvs tag newbranch_bp
cvs tag -b -r newbranch_bp newbranch
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda
multiple tags, so no need to cause a bump in version
number if nothing changed.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different
software, why is it hosted in the non-gnu area on
ftp.gnu.org?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
system. Not an SCM system.
While it may be wise to keep track of the information in CVS, it should be
the build system (be it make or whatever) that assigns identification to
the release.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living
that they other project is in CVS, so ignore that
point for now.
Just treat it as vendor sources and read up on the CVS docs on vendor
branches.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal
option. ;-
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info-cvs
time so that make will do a
rebuild.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:12:44PM -0800, Schwenk, Jeanie wrote:
Today, as I go to check in several files, I did a cvs update. No problem.
cvs update -A
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan
.
(skill is a linux-ism that is pretty close to something like kill `pidof
...`. Actually, depending on which package your /bin/kill came from,
/bin/kill -HUP inetd might have worked as well, but I've some to use skill
by default)
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
cfengine
(http://www.gnu.org/software/cfengine/cfengine.html) and put those
configuration files under CVS control.
Check the CVS archives. Been discussed here several times in the past. :-
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living
case UNIX:
cp file1.native file1.unix
case MAC:
mac2unix file1.native file1.unix
default:
error out unsupported platform
use file1.unix
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 06:02:42PM -0400, Matt McClure wrote:
You can add a line like
*.jpg -k 'b'
to the cvswrappers file in your CVSROOT module.
I'd actually suggest something like:
*.[jJ][pP][gG] -k 'b'
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda
back into the main tree.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
/info-cvs/2000-October/013058.html
After that, you may want to try adding site:mail.gnu.org to the search to
focus on those archives.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You
), or by renaming/moving the inappropriate RSH.EXE.
What about the built in :server: method?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all
Mozilla, and possibly wine). You download
a tar file and unpack it, and then you can do cvs commands directly
from there.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze
hacked cvs client to take your DES encrypted password
from the command line and use it directly.
It gains nothing.
This is what MS added to SMB. And it didn't gain them anything either.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living
ugo.
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info-cvs mailing list
+rs on the
top level directory, for instance.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info-cvs mailing list
logical (g+s sets directory-groupid on file
creation, but files won't be created).
But don't you still want g+s on the directories so that new directories
automatically inherit those group permissions?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all
, but why bother :ext: works?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
.
If you are that paranoid about your developers compromising system
passwords, then put them on a separate system that has no privileges, so
even if they do get root, they can't affect the rest of your network.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We
.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info-cvs mailing list
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 04:03:09PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
[ On Friday, July 13, 2001 at 11:47:27 (-0700), Mike Castle wrote: ]
presenting two versions of the files in question to the user.
Currently CVS does not present to versions of the file to the user.
Yes it does.
I tested
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:21:52AM +0530, Bhavaniprasad Polimetla wrote:
How can i implement this?
Standard unix groups.
Make chgrp foo login_module.
Add john to foo.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow
, but couldn't be
overridden, then that would be worth while. Check the archives for around
October, 2000.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features
, they ARE conceptually the same.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 08:00:23PM +0200, Ingolf Steinbach wrote:
if they were checked in as binary? I believe that many users would
appreciate a change which ignores -k for binary files.
So when are you going to contribute the code that does it?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED
option.
cvs up -A
cvs up -j next_release
[resolve any conflicts]
cvs commit -m merged in changes done on next_release branch
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
?
Exactly what IS the better mousetrap?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:56:09AM -0400, Larry Jones wrote:
Since such file don't allow for concurrent modifications, I can't
imagine why you'd want to use the *Concurrent* Versions System to store
them.
It's free and has decent networking capabilities?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL
me with
this?
cvs co -c
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info
a simple
document. But then, that's just me.
Choosing an inferior tool just because the version control system can't handle
a full-featured one is a poor way to work.
*shrug*
Name calling.
I consider Word to be an inferior tool.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com
/Write or whatever it
was called. I can't believe they've always been so dense...)
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different
air of competition between the
groups, might want to make it so they can't even read each other's
repositories (more for sake of competition than anything else). LockDir
setting might be of interest here.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all
that.
issues with concurrent accesses.
Or should I rather create two sandboxes and use commit/update to synchronize
them?
commit/update.
If you have to go onto a branch to do that, fine. But commit/update
always. Commit early, commit often.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED
symlinks.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info-cvs mailing
, 2001 at 02:44:52PM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:03:58PM -0400, Derek R. Price wrote:
Mike Castle wrote:
But consider the following sequence:
branch at 1.1. Branch has 1.1.0.1 and 1.1.0.2.
I'm going to pretend these are valid branch version numbers
cvs update. or i need to update
once for one file.
Once per file. If it was more than 3 files, it might be worth it to script
it. But for just three, it's easy to just do a cvs stat, see the current
number, and back off one revision.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 03:26:31PM -0400, Derek R. Price wrote:
Mike Castle wrote:
And I think that this complete merging happens less than you might think.
It cannot handle the situation where a specific set of changes is migrated
before another (i.e., -j tag1 -j tag2). It may not even
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:03:58PM -0400, Derek R. Price wrote:
Mike Castle wrote:
But consider the following sequence:
branch at 1.1. Branch has 1.1.0.1 and 1.1.0.2.
I'm going to pretend these are valid branch version numbers for the sake of
argument.
Thanks. Been a while since
from 1.1 -
1.1.0.2. Then I apply the diff from 1.1.0.3 - current. Because I know
I've already applied 1.1.0.3.
If you're going to automate this, this is how I would expect the automation
to work.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us
2. apply the diff, as a patch, to the to version
They don't even have to have a common ancestor. It can be any two
versions, and really, in any order (example, maybe you want to back out a
specific set of changes on a particular branch).
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED
looked at. Not something you could easily do with cvs automatically
tracking it.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different
a lot
higher administrative overhead.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal (You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different); -- gcc
as secure as using a password.
Try that and see how it works.
(someone recently posted the instructions they use internally for using
ssh/cvs like this. You could check the archives for that. If those
instructions say do not enter a passphrase, then you should enter one
anyway).
mrc
--
Mike
then take your private key and use it wherever they like.
I'm not sure how useful something like ssh-agent is in this case, I have
no experience with it. But maybe that's what you need.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 06:21:05PM +0200, Fabrice Gautier wrote:
I would like to create a local cvs server which mirror another
repository. I only have anonymous access to the original repository.
would cvsup work in this scenario?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED
, and many would say
that's too many (obviously I don't fall into THAT category though ;-).
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
want to keep a cvs repository
and a clearcase vob in sync.
Maybe cvsup would offer a better level of abstraction for this.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda
the
files that are in the way, and do cvs up again and that should be
sufficient. If it's a lot of files, it will probably be easier to rm -rf
the heirarchy and from the top level to a cvs up -Pd.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:45:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just don't do it.
Or, if you insist on living dangerously (as I do) use editors and
Well, yeah.
I used certain implementations of vi to accomplish that as well.
I just wasn't going to give
comfortable with it, I'd either
do EVERYTHING inside of cygwin, or nothing. I get the impression that as
long as you don't mix and match what type of tools work on a file, you
should be ok.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
(probably vim, but not certain)
to edit the files. And compile on the NT box.
But I was EXTREMLEY careful about making sure I didn't muck up any line
endings.
And I would not recommend it for anyone with less than 10 years experience
in both Unix and DOS-like worlds.
mrc
--
Mike Castle
works fine) onto NFS-mounted partitions.
You're not using a reiserfs partition via NFS are you?
There are known issues with that just plain not working.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:36:36AM -0500, Bob Stafford wrote:
If my working copy is already tied to the branch, how do I make it revert to
the main trunk without deleting the working copy and checking out the main
trunk.
cvs up -A
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can
on the servers
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
.
Just don't do it.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan
built
in actually, called a change number.
If I was going to run a running counter like this, I'd probably use a 3rd
party database like PostgresQL.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
aborted]: Can't parse date/time: ...'
I always use the ISO standard:
-D 2001-05-01
-D 2001-05-01 13:00
Also relative:
-D 4 hours ago
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 12:26:15PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a way to get the list of files that a user has currently check out
for writing (edit command)
cvs editors?
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
the appropriate files, for instance) and pass that back to the
developer via email. This way I don't for a commit of invalid code into
the system, but the developer can still see things in the same way that I
did.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL
. Makes it easier to handle situations like this.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:34:33AM -1000, Joseph Dane wrote:
"Mike" == Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike As I said in an earlier post, this can be scripted around.
can you give me an idea as to what such a script might look like?
wouldn't there have to be some sort of
le on your harddrive. Now, you may have uncommitted changes, and
if you later commit those, the tag does not reflect that. It tags just the
version of the file you last updated to.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right al
we were talking about a generic tool that would do a merge for
any arbitrary file and save it to disk. What needs to use CVS/Entries?
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com
. Ok.
So there'd have to be some protocol that 3 files, and some sort of return
code and CVS would handle marking up all of the Entries stuff (conflict,
resolved status, appropriate time stamps, etc).
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED
g the fact that no matter what SCM tool we use,
we're still going to have to write our own wrappers around it.)
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at l
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 06:06:22PM -0400, Eric Siegerman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:27:15PM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
I've recently started working at a perforce shop. One thing that perforce
does with it's merging is, instead of doing a default merge, it gives you
options
, and can't be managed in any natural
way.
A logrotate type of program can't work against history?
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice
. It determines
the sizes of a patch and compares it against the size of the newest
version. And then sends the smaller of the two.
True, the server determines whether to send a patch or not. The client
just applies it.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work
and just use :ext: with rsh or ssh.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow
Thu Nov 2 22:08:47 2000//
Are you using a file system that is not case senstive and tools that may
change the case of files? If you see this, does the CVS/Entries file still
have the file listed? Is your disk full where maybe the rewriting of the
CVS/Entries file fails?
mrc
--
M
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:11:42PM -0500, Derek R. Price wrote:
$ find newdir -type f -exec cvs add {} \;
This is the first command I've ever seen that works better with -exec vs
-print | xargs
(Ie, it won't work at all with -print | xargs)
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like
part of the merge... oh damn
cvs up -A
make clean
make
make test
Granted, not that big of a deal, but annoying.
And does answer the question as to why one doesn't want to use -kk. It can
also be a little slow having to rewrite all of your files when doing the
-A.
mrc
--
Mike Castle
on Win32 systems where people had two files
of the same name but mixed case. :-/
What should I be looking at, if I really want to know
what's causing this and how to stop it.
Move the file out of the way, do an update, and then verify that they
actually do have the same contents.
mrc
--
Mike
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:15:52AM -0800, Stephen Rasku wrote:
Why is this a problem? You can always do "cvs update -A" after you
have checked in your changes to get rid of the sticky tag.
Because it mucks up binary files?
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: Yo
program externally after
generating diffs in a slightly different manner.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:51:46AM +0900, Develop01 wrote:
is there any simple command/flag for omitting binary (non-text) files from
an import/update?
-I
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time
t;BUG #123" and you could have something on the backend that
will notice this in the message, and mark the bug as fixed in the bug
tracking system.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not w
d. So
typically add at any given time, probably no more than 3 files at once:
source, header, documentation.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least
for those files.
What exact problems are you having?
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living
words:
Sure. Run cvs in server mode over ssh, and use standard unix permissions.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
the server on NT (*shiver*), you could be using NT level
ACL's.
But, basically, something supported by your OS, rather than CVS.
(No sense trying to have CVS reinvent the wheel, perhaps poorly).
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Since there is a race condition where someone coudl check in a file on the
branch after you did the merge but before you tagged, I would recommend not
trying to use rtag anyway.
Instead, check out the branch you want to merge, tag there, then do the
merge.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo