Re: Skiplist causing DB problems?

2004-01-17 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Hi, -- Jason Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on Freitag, 16. Januar 2004 17:00 Uhr -0800 regarding Skiplist causing DB problems?: Here is the problem, shown in my logfiles: Jan 16 16:46:01 obsidian master[167]: process started Jan 16 16:46:01 obsidian ctl_cyrusdb[168]:

Re: LDAP ptloader Take2

2004-01-17 Thread Igor Brezac
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Tim Pushor wrote: Ok, after doing some hunting, I found out that my imapd was not being built with the experimental ldap pts module because: 1) For some reason my openldap wasn't installing the liblutil related header files, and It should not. These are openldap

Problem With installing IMAPD

2004-01-17 Thread Cody Harris
(Note: I'm not curretly on this list. Please CC any replies) I just installed cyrus-sasl-2.1.17 and did an ldconfig. When i went back to the cyrus-imapd-2.0.17 and did a ./configure i get: checking for dlopen... yes checking for sasl.h... no configure: error: Cannot continue without libsasl.

Follow-Up: Unable to update seen flag for some mailboxes

2004-01-17 Thread Patrick Goetz
Yesterday I posted a question to this list regarding a problem I was having with the mailboxes for some users on cyrus 2.1.15; namely previously read messages were being marked as unread every time the mailbox listing was refreshed by the IMAP server. One thing I didn't make clear was that this

Re: OT - Getting Sendmail to not rewrite the recipient (to) address

2004-01-17 Thread Andrzej Filip
David W. Wormuth wrote: I haven't integrated sendmail and cyrus, hence the OT (off-topic) in the heading. My domains Y.org and Z.org are cnames for X.org Sendmail replaces CNAMEs by real names. Use A records insted of CNAMEs in DNS zone. Your sendmail can be instructed to skip CNAMEs

Re: Sendmail rules for delivering to user@domain1 local and user@doma in2 cyrus

2004-01-17 Thread Andrzej Filip
Joe Thomas wrote: Running FreeBSD (4.7R) with Sendmail 8.12.9 and Cyrus 2.2.2 BETA... I have two domains on this box with a user that exists in both domains. I want email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be delivered via sendmail:local as if cyrus weren't around (which it does) and email for [EMAIL

Re: Skiplist causing DB problems?

2004-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello and thanks for your reply... check the permissions for /var/imap/db. I had a problem with that once. What's in /var/imap/db? centralcore# ls -la /var/imap/ total 20 drwxr-xr-x 10 cyrus cyrus 512 Jan 17 22:23 . drwxr-xr-x 21 root wheel 512 Jan 17 22:23 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 cyrus cyrus

Re: nntp fiddling

2004-01-17 Thread Nils Vogels
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Ken Murchison wrote: There is no overlap between the groups from the different servers, and grouping them is easy with wildcard matching: cups.* microsoft.* infragistics.* everything else OK, so you need the newspeer option to be a *list* of peers? But you *don't*

PTS LDAP Take 3

2004-01-17 Thread Tim Pushor
I am assuming by the lack of response that no-one really cares (at least at this point) about LDAP group based authorization. I have determined that the way its currently setup (the ldap ptloader) won't do what I want, so I am in the process of rewriting it for my needs. I am wondring if there

Re: PTS LDAP Take 3

2004-01-17 Thread +archive . info-cyrus
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Tim Pushor wrote: I am assuming by the lack of response that no-one really cares (at least at this point) about LDAP group based authorization. Oh, I wouldn't go that far. I just think folks haven't gotten too deep into it yet. If you search the archive you'll see it was

Re: PTS LDAP Take 3

2004-01-17 Thread Tim Pushor
I have determined that the way its currently setup (the ldap ptloader) won't do what I want, so I am in the process of rewriting it for my needs. Interesting. Why is that? (Not using it myself right now, but would like to at some point.) Because it relies on a user having multiple

Re: PTS LDAP Take 3

2004-01-17 Thread Igor Brezac
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Tim Pushor wrote: I have determined that the way its currently setup (the ldap ptloader) won't do what I want, so I am in the process of rewriting it for my needs. Interesting. Why is that? (Not using it myself right now, but would like to at some point.)