Maibox does not exist

Hello all, I experimenting the following problem: /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver -m test.haubold-int.de +test.haubold-int.de: Mailbox does not exist But the mailbox definetely EXIST: telnet localhost 143 Trying ::1... telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to

Sieve for shared mailboxes

What is the current situation with Sieve for shared mailboxes? I've read the discussion from last July on the cyrus-devel list, subject [PROPOSAL] Sieve for shared mailboxes, but I can't find any anything on the subject more recent than this. Is it still the intention to use the IMAP ANNOTATE

Cyrus and imapd fun ina debian box

I've installed cyrus in my debian box as a package. Now I would like to configure it so it used imapds (port 993). Could anyone outlineme what I need to get going? For instance, I've created a certificate, installed it in /var/imap/ and added the following lines in /etc/imapd.conf: #

permission denied

Hello all, I'm experimenting the following error in the /var/log/imap.log when I use /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver -m user.test Mar 17 20:51:52 lighthouse lmtpunix[21459]: accepted connection Mar 17 20:51:52 lighthouse lmtpunix[21459]: lmtp connection preauth'd as postman Mar 17 20:51:52 lighthouse

IMAP clients that use ANNOTATE[MORE]

Greets - I was thinking about enabling ANNOTATEMORE on the Cyrus IMAPd 2.2.3 build I'm planning. I was curious though, is it worth it? Are there IMAP clients in the wild that use ANNOTATE and ANNOTATEMORE? Most of my users are Mozilla Mail, Netscape Mail (4.7x), pine, mutt, and Evolution

Re: IMAP clients that use ANNOTATE[MORE]

Scott Russell wrote: Greets - I was thinking about enabling ANNOTATEMORE on the Cyrus IMAPd 2.2.3 build I'm planning. I was curious though, is it worth it? Are there IMAP clients in the wild that use ANNOTATE and ANNOTATEMORE? ANNOTATEMORE is enabled by default in 2.2.3 (and can't be

Re: Cyrus 'breaks' RFC?!

Jamie Penman-Smithson wrote: Hey all, Someone I've been setting up an account for, kept getting the same mail over and over again. Having questioned him about it, he said that he had the 'keep mail on server' option in Outlook. (*sigh* why can't people use _real_ MUA's) Then he said that

Re: sendmail and virtual domains and catchalls?

Carl Brewer wrote: I've been trying a number of combinations of configs to try and get sendmail (8.12.10) to handle virtual domains and catchall addresses for those virtual domains, but am not sure if what I'm trying to do can be achieved with sendmail? Say I have 2 virtual domains and a default.