Hello,
what do you think about moving the mailspool to a central SAN storage
shared via NFS and having several blades to manage the mmapped files
like seen state, quota etc.? So still only one server is responsible for
a certain set of mailboxes, but these SAN boxes have nice backup and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/12/07 5:41 AM, Marten Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
what do you think about moving the mailspool to a central SAN storage
shared via NFS and having several blades to manage the mmapped files
like seen state, quota etc.? So still only one server is
Hello!
I want to build load-balanced mail system with LVS, Postfix, Cyrus IMAP,
MySQL and Murder or Perdition.
For now I plan to use two nodes for storing users' mailboxes (each node will
store one half of mailboxes).
First, incoming mail will come to Postfix. But where (at what node) Postfix
Hi list,
I have a problem with my cyrus server that I managed to track to the
presence of the LDAP on the system.
The user and group information is obtained form the LDAP server.
When this functionality is enabled, when I start cyrus I get the
following error:
Feb 12 14:58:12 pingo
Igor Zhbanov wrote:
Hello!
I want to build load-balanced mail system with LVS, Postfix, Cyrus IMAP,
MySQL and Murder or Perdition.
A note on LVS with perdition (launched from xinetd): set the KEEPALIVE
flag to true if you are using xinetd.
For now I plan to use two nodes for storing
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Marten Lehmann wrote:
what do you think about moving the mailspool to a central SAN storage
shared via NFS and having several blades to manage the mmapped files
like seen state, quota etc.?
Why do you need NFS?
The whole point of a SAN is distributed access to storage
If anyone wants to assist in testing, here is the bug report
I filed just now:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370178
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info:
Hi everyone,
I have a user running Outlook 2000 and new messages stopped showing a few
days ago. After running reconstruct once, two new messages showed up, but
subsequent runs have not had any affect.
I have about 50 users running a mix of various Outlooks, Thunderbird and
Eudora and none one
On Monday 12 February 2007 10:56, James Miller wrote:
So, I'm not sure if this is an Outlook issue or cyrus-imap issue -- I'm
leaning towards it being something wrong with that profile on Outlook since
if he switches to Tbird all of the messages show up just fine -- and I had
him create a
Hello,
Why do you need NFS?
because NFS is the only standard network file protocol. I don't want to
load a proprietary driver into the kernel to access a SAN device.
The whole point of a SAN is distributed access to storage after all :).
So where's the point? SANs usually have redundant
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Marten Lehmann wrote:
because NFS is the only standard network file protocol. I don't want to
load a proprietary driver into the kernel to access a SAN device.
Fair enough, although NFS is likely to be really rather slow compared to a
block device which just happens to
David Carter wrote:
Why do you need NFS?
The whole point of a SAN is distributed access to storage after all :).
SAN distributes the disk, not the filesystem. I presume in this case hes
not using the SAN for its multiple-client-access features but just
because its fast/reliable.
Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/12/07 11:01 AM, David Carter wrote:
I would be surprised if NFS worked given that it is only a approximation
to a real Unix filesystem. Cyrus really hammers the filesystem.
NFS does not work with cyrus. Been there, done that, didn't like the
Fastmail dont use SAN, as I understand they use external raid arrays.
There are many ways to lose your data, one of these being filesystem
error, others being software bugs and human error. Block-level replication
(typically used in SANs) is very fast and uses few resources but doesnt
protect
If it's using block level replication, how does it offer instant
recovery on filesystem corruption? Does it track every block written
to disk, and can thus roll back to effectively what was on disk at a
particular instant in time, so you then just remount the filesystem
and the replay of the
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, urgrue wrote:
If it's using block level replication, how does it offer instant recovery
on filesystem corruption? Does it track every block written to disk, and
can thus roll back to effectively what was on disk at a particular instant
in time, so you then just remount
GSSAPI authentication from Thunderbird to Cyrus IMAP works!
You MUST:
1. Specify a FQDN for your IMAP server in Thunderbird's
account settings. I was specifying an IP address. Not
good enough.
2. The FQDN must resolve somehow. For me, it was a matter
of adding info to
I agree of course about avoiding SPOFs, but I do like a multi-tiered
approach, I mean multiple lines of defense. I use SAN for its speed,
reliability, and ease of administration, but naturally I replicate
everything on the SAN and have true backups as well.
So you have multiple SAN's? Or
18 matches
Mail list logo
