Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:51:50PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:28:07AM +1030, Stephen Carr wrote:
I get the following type of error (see below) during replication that
appeared after upgrading from 2.3.8 to 2.3.11.
BAH - upload_messages_from()
Gary Mills wrote:
Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
forwarding loop which cyrus breaks by discarding the e-mail. During
this vacation, all of the person's e-mail disappeared.
Shouldn't we
You can either remove the CRAM-MD5 SASL plugin, or restrict the list of
advertised mechanisms by using the 'sasl_mech_list' option in imapd.conf
Joshua Tew wrote:
I have not been able to authenticate POP3 over SSL from thunderbird
2.0.0.12 to Cyrus POm.3.8 on a OS X Server 10.5.
I have
It was added at some point in the 2.3 tree and is used for the IMAP
URLAUTH extension which isn't widely supported by clients yet.
Shelley Waltz wrote:
I searched, but could not find the relevant infomation regarding
the mboxkey_db database in 2.3.7
My current 2.2.3 install simply has
Joseph Brennan wrote:
I'm all for trying fix this if someone can come up with some logic to do
so. IMO, the code is correctly processing the script as written. Here
is the current code logic:
- original message is sent to lmtpd
- message is forwarded and a record is put in deliver.db
Mike Eggleston wrote:
Is there a way to change sieve's subject from 'Auto: ...' to 'Automated
Reply: ...'?
Change the string in sieve/bc_eval.c
--
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
Cyrus Home Page:
Joseph Silverman wrote:
can someone explain what the difference is?
so, I use cyradm to 'sq user/ME 12345678' - afterwards I see than if I
'lq user/ME' I see the number. HOWEVER, if I 'lqr user/ME' I don't
see anything. There appears to be no 'sqr' command and the only way I
know to
Make sure that you enable allowusermoves in imapd.conf. Make sure to
read the associated warnings. Then using cyradm:
rename user.ruser user.suser
Joseph Silverman wrote:
I tried 'mv /var/spool/imap/r/user/ruser /var/spool/imap/s/user/suser/
ruser-copy' and then 'reconstruct -f -r
at 16:01 -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I've changed my existing server to use the altnamespace and while for
one of my test accounts, they see the new namespace:
J2 NAMESPACE
* NAMESPACE (( .)) ((Other Users. .)) ((Shared Folders. .))
J2 OK Completed
Another
Is saslauthd configured and running?
Michael Jørgensen wrote:
This must really be a neewbie problem .-(
I'm trying to connect to my IMAP server using Thunderbird. I'm not
interested in SSL, so in Thunderbird I selected the radio button TLS,
if possible. However, Thunderbird refuses to
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I've changed my existing server to use the altnamespace and while for
one of my test accounts, they see the new namespace:
J2 NAMESPACE
* NAMESPACE (( .)) ((Other Users. .)) ((Shared Folders. .))
J2 OK Completed
Another account is not:
E2 NAMESPACE
Michael Menge wrote:
Hi,
I had a look at rfc2033. It is possible to send an individual returncode
after the DATA stage for each recipient.
So befor I try to patch the lmtpd, i would like to discus, which is
the desired/expected behavior. To make discussion easier lets think about
common
Michael Menge wrote:
Hi,
i don't know if this is a bug or a feature, but it seems that lmtpd
checks quota befor a e-mail is parsed by the sieve script. This causes
over quota bounces for
messages that would have been discarded or redirected.
Is there a way to only send the over quota
Its probably time for a new release. CVS compiles on my Linux box,
which platform are you on? Which bugs would you consider a priority?
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
Dear list!
Is anyone still reading bugs for the Cyrus SASL lib and considering patches?
The current CVS version of Cyrus SASL
at 12:11:34PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
Its probably time for a new release. CVS compiles on my Linux box,
which platform are you on? Which bugs would you consider a priority?
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
Dear list!
Is anyone still reading bugs for the Cyrus SASL lib and considering patches
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
Hi Ken!
Thanks for coming back on this one.
CVS compiles on my Linux box,
I will re-check this tomorrow. Might have been my fault.
OK. I'll do a test compile on our Solaris install.
Which bugs would you consider a priority?
Me personally: #3031. But
rupert wrote:
Hello first,
I was able to set up an murder cluster with one backend and a frontend
which also acts as a mupdate server.
i could get the mailbox accounts from the backend, which was a
standalone before.
I read that now the murder is running i should only create accounts on
3 at=0400
#delprune cmd=ctl_deliver -E 3 period=1440
# this is only necessary if caching TLS sessions
tlsprunecmd=tls_prune at=0400
# Squat failed, helps
squatter cmd=squatter -r user period=1440
}
On Jan 11, 2008 2:30 PM, Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto
cant connect with
a mail client.
On Jan 11, 2008 1:13 PM, Rupertt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
rupert wrote:
Hello first,
I was able to set up an murder cluster with one backend and a frontend
which also acts
David Reid wrote:
Is it possible to deliver mail (after procmail processing) to the server
such that sieve processing will still be occur? When using deliver it
seems to bypass sieve totally.
You have to deliver via LMTP. 'deliver -l' will do this but I *think*
deliver with any other options
Keith Edmunds wrote:
I've searched but been unable to find any information about this. Is it
feasible to have murder running over a WAN? We want to have two IMAP
servers in separate locations.
Thanks for any info or pointers.
CMU does this. We have a campus in Qatar with a couple of
Giuseppe Ravasio wrote:
Hi,
i need to move a big mailbox (about 20GB) to a new partition. Obiouvsly the
idea is doing something like:
cyradm renm big/mailbox big/mailbox newpartition
I think that the system will need about half an hour to move mailbox files to
the new location (another
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Hi,
When doing unuxpunge -l it doesn't show the spaces e.g. in the subject line.
Could someone confirme this, so I can file a bug report.
I'm running 2.3.10
unexpunge is pulling info from the index and cache files, and this is
how the subject header is stored for
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Hi,
When doing unuxpunge -l it doesn't show the spaces e.g. in the
subject line.
Could someone confirme this, so I can file a bug report.
I'm running 2.3.10
unexpunge is pulling info from the index and cache files
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hello,
I have a shared mailbox, and I want to give the users the right to
delete messages in it, but not the right to delete the mailbox itself.
How can I do that?
Look at the cyradm(1) manpage. The description of the individual ACL
bits is under 'setacl'
--
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.11. This
release should be considered production quality.
Noteworthy changes:
* Fixed several skiplist bugs -- courtesy of Fastmail.fm.
* Add robustness to skiplist recovery -- courtesy of Fastmail.fm.
* Added support
Matthieu Hallouin free wrote:
hi,
is it possible to authenticate users by certificate ?
thanks
If you mean by TLS client certificate, yes. The client must present the
certificate to the server with the user's credentials, and then
authenticate using the 'EXTERNAL' SASL mechanism.
--
Matthieu Hallouin free wrote:
Ken Murchison a écrit :
Matthieu Hallouin free wrote:
hi,
is it possible to authenticate users by certificate ?
thanks
If you mean by TLS client certificate, yes. The client must present
the certificate to the server with the user's credentials
Andrzej Kwiatkowski wrote:
Hello.
On my page http://www.kwiatek.eu.org/soft/patches/
is now available version of Cyrus Sasl library patch
for version 2.1.22.
After applying this patch you can use PostgreSQL as
auth mechanism, and use this backend without PAM.
Next step is to create
Guillermo Gómez wrote:
pam_mysql would correlate to saslauthd, and the cyrus sasl plugin
would correlate to auxprop.
See documentation on the SASL pwcheck_method setting
(sasl_pwcheck_method in /etc/imapd.conf).
When set to saslauthd, the pwcheck_method will allow the use of
the PLAIN and
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
Hi,
I have a quite large folder hierarchy. On mobile clients I'd like to
have a limited view on this hierarchy, i.e. I'd like to see only
important folders. Unfortunately the mobile clients don't understand
subscriptions.
So, how would I go on to get a
Folks,
I have recently been informed that Cyrus timsieved has had an
incompatible MANAGESIEVE STARTTLS implementation since v2.1.10. The
problem is that the server is supposed to automatically issue a
CAPABILITY response at the completion of STARTTLS, but this
functionality was removed in
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:40:21 +0100 (CET), Simon Matter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Hi Bron,
Did you consider this one
http://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3006 in the patch above?
From a quick look it seems both patches conflict, is #3006 obsolete now?
Bron Gondwana wrote:
As usual you can get the patches here:
http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
I've been busy with Cyrus _again_ - so much for my theory
that I was taking a break.
OK - here's what's new.
* http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/patches/cyrus-skiplist-bugfixes-2.3.10.diff
Gary Mills wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 12:35:46PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
-- Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on
17. November 2007 11:21:38 -0500 regarding Re: One more attempt: stuck
processes:
Here's a patch that seems to fix
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
Well,
the new patch works as intended (processes time out yet remain
straceable), but looks like it might be overzealous:
Nov 20 16:46:30 lvr13 pop3s[25622]: accepted connection
Nov 20 16:46:30 lvr13 pop3s[25622]: error or timeout in SSL_accept() -
done
Nov
Pascal Gienger wrote:
Rob Banz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We went through a similar discussion last year in OpenAFS land, and
came the same conclusion -- basically, if your filesystem is
reasonably reliable (such as ZFS is), and you can trust your
underlying storage not to lose transactions
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
-- Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on
19. November 2007 13:17:07 -0500 regarding Re: One more attempt: stuck
processes:
The only other potential downside
the patch has is that stracing or gdb'ing it causes the timeout to
trigger
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
-- Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on
19. November 2007 12:35:46 -0500 regarding Re: One more attempt: stuck
processes:
How are things looking today?
Good! When I just checked I thought I'd found a new hanging pop3d
process, because
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
-- Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on
16. November 2007 15:54:50 -0500 regarding Re: One more attempt: stuck
processes:
That's exactly what Gary is seeing.
Right. Apparently stripped binaries aren't any good for straces.
Its
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
I think I will try one more approach: I reverted cyrus.conf to not use
-U 1 anymore, so that processes should be reused. I will strace one of
the pop3d processes in the hope that it gets stuck. That way I should be
able to see where things go wrong. If the process
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 16. November 2007 09:37:42 -0600 Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Could you get a stack trace? If you have gdb you just call it with gdb
-p 19175. Then you can do bt at the prompt. I forget how to do it
with Sun's debugger.
Easy:
# pstack 19175
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
The only reason I could imagine for the sequence of calls was signal
handling. But let's be methodical. There's only one spot where
SSL_accept() is called: in tls_start_servertls(). In pop3d.c that's only
called in cmd_starttls(). That in turn is called either in
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 16. November 2007 12:39:28 -0500 Ken Murchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, my patch wasn't complete. It wasn't logging the value that I
wanted.
OK:
Nov 16 18:48:17 lvr13 pop3s[1385]: SSL_read() returned 0:5
Nov 16 18:48:33 lvr13 pop3s[1375
Dale Ghent wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 1:39 AM, Pascal Gienger wrote:
Solaris 10 does this in my case. Via dtrace you'll see that open()
on the
mailboxes.db and read-calls do not exceed microsecond ranges.
mailboxes.db
is not the problem here. It is entirely cached and rarely written
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
Nov 16 18:00:26 lvr13 pop3s[3847]: SSL_read() returned 0
Nov 16 18:00:34 lvr13 pop3s[3215]: SSL_read() returned 0
Nov 16 18:00:34 lvr13 pop3s[3199]: SSL_read() returned 0
Nov 16 18:00:39 lvr13 pop3s[3199]: SSL_read() returned 0
Nov 16 18:00:43 lvr13 pop3s[3229]:
Dale Ghent wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Ken Murchison wrote:
Dale Ghent wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 1:39 AM, Pascal Gienger wrote:
Solaris 10 does this in my case. Via dtrace you'll see that open()
on the
mailboxes.db and read-calls do not exceed microsecond ranges.
mailboxes.db
It looks like it timed out properly, correct?
(from my phone)
--
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Postmaster Uni Köln
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
Thanks. I will try this patch as soon as I can, but it's clearly not the
only issue, because the same thing happens with POP processes. Here's an
example for one:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0096441e in __read_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x00ac02f7 in
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
No. Since this potentially affects all IMAP and POP processes I would
have to do it for all entries. Do you recommend that I try that?
Since it looks like things are hanging when a process is being used, I'd
like to see if the problem goes away if we don't reuse the
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 15. November 2007 08:21:48 -0500 Ken Murchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Since this potentially affects all IMAP and POP processes I would
have to do it for all entries. Do you recommend that I try that?
Since it looks like things are hanging when
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 15. November 2007 08:32:18 -0500 Ken Murchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it looks like things are hanging when a process is being used,
I'd
like to see if the problem goes away if we don't reuse the processes.
I'm just trying to do a bsearch
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
Hi,
I've brought up this topic before. We've been running cyrus-imapd very
happily for several years. Yet there's one issue that none of the
updates have resolved. The last time I reported it we were running
2.2.12. Now we're running 2.3.8, but the issues is the
Simon Matter wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:42:02 +0100
Tomas Janousek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tjanouse Looks correct. (will not terminate if it reaches NGROUPS, don't
know if that
tjanouse can happen though)
Oops, it never happen.
It is intended to be safe-keeping for avoiding
Its nothing to worry about.
John Thomas wrote:
Am attempting to get secure imap connection working optimally. I do not
need server verification.
I am getting these in my logs. Do you know what it means or, more
importantly, if I need to worry?
Nov 3 08:51:43 srv imaps[9301]:
Ian G Batten wrote:
user.markr has, through a sequence of events, ended up with data on
both partition8 (/var/imap/partition-8) and default (/var/imap/
partition-1). All his mailboxes have been consolidated into
default, but there are still copies in partition-8.
So I think
sync_client in 2.3.10 should be much more resilient.
Rich Wales wrote:
I'm running 2.3.9 on a FreeBSD 6.2 system.
Recently, I installed 2.3.9 on an Ubuntu 7.10 system and set it up as
a replica of my original server.
Everything seems to be running well, except that the sync_client -r
Yes. The 'c' right controls CREATE/DELETE of mailboxes and the 'd'
right controls delete of messages. So, in your case, remove the 'c' right.
Lars Schimmer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I setup a cyrus 2.1.18 on debian sarge.
I tried to use a public IMAP
Tomas Janousek wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 03:52:24PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
It seems to me from the source of getgrouplist() that it sets the
actual number of groups found to ngroups only when it returns 0.
When it returns -1, the number of groups actually filled is set to
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
On the Linux box, all fresh compilations aside from the sasl 2.1.15
binaries:
I once posted to the list that 2.3.9 needs at least cyrus-sasl-2.1.19.
As
a package maintainer I know that :)
Did you ever figure out why? I'm not
John Capo wrote:
Quoting Ken Murchison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
John Capo wrote:
On Thu, October 25, 2007 21:10, John Capo wrote:
Quoting Ken Murchison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Simon Matter wrote:
On the Linux box, all fresh compilations aside from the sasl 2.1.15
binaries:
I once posted
Tomas Janousek wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
--- auth_unix.c.~1.46.~ 2007-09-27 16:02:45.0 -0400
+++ auth_unix.c 2007-10-25 23:02:15.0 -0400
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@
struct group *grp;
#ifdef HAVE_GETGROUPLIST
gid_t
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:03:35 -0400
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
murch John Capo wrote:
On Thu, October 25, 2007 21:10, John Capo wrote:
Quoting Ken Murchison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Simon Matter wrote:
On the Linux box, all fresh compilations aside
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:13:01 -0400
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
murch Tomas Janousek wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
--- auth_unix.c.~1.46.~ 2007-09-27 16:02:45.0 -0400
+++ auth_unix.c 2007-10-25
What does imapd.conf look like?
Does the output of 'ctl_mboxlist -d' look reasonable?
Does 'mbexamine user.igb' look reasonable?
Ian G Batten wrote:
I've just compiled 2.3.10 on batten.eu.org (my private x86 servers) and
although it looks OK on the Solaris 10 system, it's in deep
Ian G Batten wrote:
On 25 Oct 07, at 1248, Ken Murchison wrote:
What does imapd.conf look like?
Does the output of 'ctl_mboxlist -d' look reasonable?
Does 'mbexamine user.igb' look reasonable?
OK, there's a steady stream of imapd processes being forked and then
dying on SIGSEGV
Ian G Batten wrote:
On 25 Oct 07, at 1230, Ian G Batten wrote:
I've just compiled 2.3.10 on batten.eu.org (my private x86 servers)
and although it looks OK on the Solaris 10 system, it's in deep
trouble on the elderly Linux machine. Both are upgrades from 2.3.7,
the Solaris box is a
Ian G Batten wrote:
On the Linux box, all fresh compilations aside from the sasl 2.1.15
binaries:
imapd 2.3.7 + sasl 2.1.15: works
imapd 2.3.7 + sasl 2.1.22: works
imapd 2.3.9 + sasl 2.1.15: not tried
imapd 2.3.9 + sasl 2.1.22: works
imapd 2.3.10 + sasl 2.1.15: fails (cannot examine
Vladimir Nikolic wrote:
Hi,
I have questions regarding murder scalability. Untill last week we had
one imap server with about 5 users and 2TB mailboxes. Server was
overloaded and little slow but there was no troubles like connections
drop and repeatedly asking users for password.
Simon Matter wrote:
On the Linux box, all fresh compilations aside from the sasl 2.1.15
binaries:
I once posted to the list that 2.3.9 needs at least cyrus-sasl-2.1.19. As
a package maintainer I know that :)
Did you ever figure out why? I'm not surprised that code in Cyrus
somehow depends
Your problem is most likely related to using NFS. NFS has never been
recommended for Cyrus because is doesn't play nice with mmap() and
flock(), both of which are critical to the operation of Cyrus.
Ian G Batten wrote:
Since we moved to 2.2.6 on Solaris 10, with storage coming via NFS,
Noah Silverman wrote:
Hi,
I have cyrus and cyrus sasl installed on a freebsd box.
I can use my desktop e-mail client to reliably access my imap box.
(It has been working perfectly for months.)
I recently got a Blackberry and they have a service that will poll
the imap server for
Vincent Fox wrote:
So I want to do LMTP between an MX pool and Cyrus backends.
The common way I read about doing this, is with a shared LMTP
account from MX pool to backends. So it becomes a postman sort
of account with the password in plaintext in various places and of
course transiting
Jorey Bump wrote:
Anders Norrbring wrote, at 10/07/2007 07:06 AM:
Is there a way to disable a specific user's access to POP and IMAP in
Cyrus? I still want the mail to be delivered to the mailboxes (done via
LMTP), but I would like to turn off the user from getting the mail.
In case you
Jorey Bump wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote, at 10/07/2007 07:51 PM:
Jorey Bump wrote:
Delete ACLs:
localhost dam user.bob bob read
Now bob can't read his INBOX, and will get a message like the
following when he tries (this is from Thunderbird):
This won't work since Cyrus implicitly gives
Andrew Morgan wrote:
I would like to write the following sieve rule:
require [reject];
reject The account '${address}' has not been activated.;
Is it possible to use a variable in a string, specifically the email
address?
Cyrus Sieve doesn't support the variables extension (yet).
--
Yann Rouillard wrote:
Le dimanche 30 septembre 2007 à 11:39 +0300, Georgy Goshin a écrit :
Hello,
Thanks for the answer but the answer was not do I need this or not, I've
asked how to do it. I'll try to explain why I need this and I beleive that
not only I am.
You're not, I opened a bug
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
;
; I didn't like the way that the macro looked in the code, so I just typedef'd
; it instead. Here is my current patch. If it works, I'll commit it.
Seems fine, no crashes with my test suite.
Thanks!
(for the other
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
; This patch tries to force the entire buffer to be aligned, rather than
; aligning each 64-bit field individually. Don't know if this will work or
not.
The concept seems to work fine. There are some other places
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
; Good point. I'm wondering if we need the struct at all, and can just use a
; union.
You're right, I've just tested the following and it works fine:
#define ALIGNBUF(buf, size) \
union { \
bit64 align8
Gary Mills wrote:
We have a Cyrus murder configuration with one proxy front-end and
one storage back-end. I'm very pleased with it. However, users who
happen to look at the full headers of their e-mail are often alarmed
by the word `murder' that appears in the first `Received' header.
It's
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
; We have been running 2.3.x code on 64-bit sparcv9 kernels (Solaris 8 on Sun
; Fire V240) without any problem. What is your hardware and OS?
The test server is a Sun V210 running
SunOS xxx 5.10 Generic_125100-10 sun4u sparc SUNW
We have been running 2.3.x code on 64-bit sparcv9 kernels (Solaris 8 on
Sun Fire V240) without any problem. What is your hardware and OS?
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
; I'm finally getting around to upgrading my 2.3.7 system to 2.3.9. When I
; put in 2.3.7 I
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.9. This release
should be considered production quality. This release is currently
deployed on the production Murder at CMU, as well as several other large
sites.
This release fixes some bugs in the replication code, the handling of
Tim Bannister wrote:
Recently we saw what we hope is a one-off error on our Cyrus deployment
here. This is Cyrus 2.3.7 on x86_64 RHEL4 based on Simon Matter's RPMs.
I'd used IMAP as cyrus to delete a number of users. This is done using
some rather old code:
# Change ACL for mailbox to be
Dale Ghent wrote:
Hey all. Just curious, are there any plans re: implementing the
variables extension to Cyrus's implementation of Sieve?
Yes, but I can't give you a firm time frame.
--
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
Ross Boylan wrote:
I've created INBOX.a.b, INBOX.a.c, and others. To my suprise, there is no
INBOX.a folder. This was discussed previously on this list (2/28/06, similar
to this messages subject), and is Cyrus's expected behavior.
I've now decided I want a folder INBOX.a, that is something
Carsten Mathaes wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
I just committed this fix to CVS. Its appropriate for 2.3.8.
Ok. I changed my copy of the source in the way the diff shows and it
works fine. Thanks!
Actually, there is a better fix that was sent to me by Tomas Janousek at
Redhat.
https
Carsten Mathaes wrote:
Hi,
I was looking around (Cyrus-Wiki, List, Google ... ) but I did not found
really helpful things.
Now I want to ask here, if there is a way, to compile Cyrus-IMAPD 2.3.8
against the current BerkeleyDB (4.5.20).
Always I got the error:
cyrusdb_berkeley.c:162: error:
Brian Dial wrote:
oh, duh. i thhought they were part of the core by now. thanks!
They will be integrated once they support all possible configurations of :
unixhierarchysep, virtdomains, and Murder
Simon Matter wrote:
Using SuSE 10.2 with the included cyrus-imapd-2.2.13 I was able to
Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:50:32AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
This behavior is annoying because I build the Cyrus software on a
development server but then install it on other servers where there
is no compiler and the source tree is mounted read-only
Dickson Law wrote:
Hi all
If I do not include the :subject directive in my vacation script the
reply subject line would be
'Re: X' where is the original subject line.
But If I add :subject Out of the Office in the vacation script the
subject line would be just that without appending
Blake Hudson wrote:
I am having a problem where long POP transactions are being closed by
the server.
I turned on per-user debugging, but didn't actually see the problem
until I ran a packet sniffer(wireshark) on the server.
The transaction goes as follows:
1) Client connects/auths
2) Client
tarjei wrote:
Hi,
Many of my users are having problems saving sent emails to the sent
folder in Thunderbird.
This is a known problem in Thunderbird and partly documented here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206408
What I am wondering about is if anyone can give me some advice
Bron Gondwana wrote:
We've now fully updated our patchset against 2.3.8 and rolled it out
to all our servers. As usual, the patches are available at:
http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
I still don't understand why the allow-plaintext-for-sync_client patch
is needed. Doesn't 'sync_server -p2'
Simon Matter wrote:
URLs for this release:
ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus/cyrus-imapd-2.3.8.tar.gz
or
http://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus/cyrus-imapd-2.3.8.tar.gz
Questions and comments can be directed to
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu (public list), or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for
Simon Matter wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.8. This release
should be considered production quality. This release (minus
replication) is currently deployed on the production Murder at CMU,
and the replication code is deployed in production at several other
large
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.8. This release
should be considered production quality. This release (minus
replication) is currently deployed on the production Murder at CMU,
and the replication code is deployed in production at several other
large sites.
Please note
Olivier Delemar wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if there is a way to view the list of already responded addresses when
a sieve/vacation script is active on a mailbox. I've bee googling around for a
couple of hours without success.
I use cyrus on a Kolab server.
Not easily. The data you're looking
peter pilsl wrote:
I recently upgraded from 2.0.16 to cyrus 2.2 and first followed the
offical upgrade-document at
http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/imapd/install-upgrade.html
This document has several serious flaws.
neither the recommended rehash works as proposednor could I convert the
201 - 300 of 1988 matches
Mail list logo
