Marcelo Terres wrote:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from Horde) and
everything is working, except vacation. The sieve script is correct,
but nothing happens when the message come
Does the script have an :address parameter? If not, it will never work!
Search the list achive; this has been the problem with 3/4 of all cases.
Regards,
Torsten
Martin Schweizer schrieb:
Hello Marcelo
Is the script activated? Is the synatax correct? Check with sieveshell.
Regards,
Yes, the directory is correct. If I put a forward filter there, the
message is forwarded correctly.
The problem is specifically with vacation.
This is the script:
# Sieve Filter
# Generated by Ingo (http://www.horde.org/ingo/) (September 25, 2007, 4:38 pm)
require vacation;
# Férias
vacation
Here is the script:
# Sieve Filter
# Generated by Ingo (http://www.horde.org/ingo/) (September 25, 2007, 4:38 pm)
require vacation;
# Férias
vacation :days 0 :addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] :subject Retorno
de mensagem Teste de mensagem de resposta;
I just don't understand what is require
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Marcelo Terres might have said:
The script has an :addresses parameter not an :address. Is this a problem ?
I've been trying to get vacation working also. Is the :addresses [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
the address of the person we're looking to send a custom reply to or is this
the
The script has an :addresses parameter not an :address. Is this a problem ?
On 9/26/07, Torsten Schlabach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the script have an :address parameter? If not, it will never work!
Search the list achive; this has been the problem with 3/4 of all cases.
Regards,
Torsten
I just don't understand what is require vacation.
It's a kind of declaration. Your script announces it will need the
vacation module. If it would not be there, imapd would probably
complain. But it's usually built in.
I'm sure that sieve is working cause if the user add a forward filter,
Hi
- Quote ---
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-07.txt
4.5. Address Parameter and Limiting Replies to Personal Messages
Vacation MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's
email address is in a To, Cc, Bcc,
I think that addresses in this case is ':addresses
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I'm putting my address in this line.
On 9/26/07, Mike Eggleston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Marcelo Terres might have said:
The script has an :addresses parameter not an :address. Is this a problem ?
In this case, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just an example, this is not
the real address.
On 9/26/07, Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcelo Terres wrote:
Yes, the directory is correct. If I put a forward filter there, the
message is forwarded correctly.
The problem is specifically with
Hello.
I hope you made sure that the forwarding is by the means of Sieve, not
in the MTA?
Yes, sieve is working in forward filter. I saw in the logs.
I am not sure about the days: 0 parameter. I know the default is 7, but
will 0 mean that a response is sent every time?
I think so.
Hello Marcelo
Is the script activated? Is the synatax correct? Check with sieveshell.
Regards,
2007/9/25, Marcelo Terres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from
12 matches
Mail list logo
