Ken Murchison wrote:
> Agreed. I'm going to add the Precedence header check momentarily. We
> are going to skip the List- header check because it would be difficult
> to implement given the current cmu-sieve architecture, and this check
> doesn't seem to be in wide use.
>
Our system includes the
Scott Russell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:49:26AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
> >
> >
> > Scott Russell wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:41:31AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Scott Russell wrote:
> > > > > My first concern is that vacation NOT respon
Scott Russell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:41:31AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
> >
> >
> > Scott Russell wrote:
> > >
> > > Okay, I've got the sieve stuff from 2.1.x CVS build under 2.0.16 and
> > > everything seems to be running fine. A few test scripts I setup worked
> > > as expecte
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:41:31AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>
> Scott Russell wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I've got the sieve stuff from 2.1.x CVS build under 2.0.16 and
> > everything seems to be running fine. A few test scripts I setup worked
> > as expected.
> >
> > With the vacation setup, wh
Scott Russell wrote:
>
> Okay, I've got the sieve stuff from 2.1.x CVS build under 2.0.16 and
> everything seems to be running fine. A few test scripts I setup worked
> as expected.
>
> With the vacation setup, what will it NOT respond to. I've some of this
> listed in the draft but I'm lookin
Quoting Amos Gouaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:16:43 -0500,
> > Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sr) writes:
>
> sr> My first concern is that vacation NOT respond to mail with headers of
> sr> Precedence: Bulk. I know Mailman uses this and we have a lot
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:16:43 -0500,
> Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sr) writes:
sr> My first concern is that vacation NOT respond to mail with headers of
sr> Precedence: Bulk. I know Mailman uses this and we have a lot of mailman lists
sr> here. :)
I'm afraid I can't answer that
Okay, I've got the sieve stuff from 2.1.x CVS build under 2.0.16 and
everything seems to be running fine. A few test scripts I setup worked
as expected.
With the vacation setup, what will it NOT respond to. I've some of this
listed in the draft but I'm looking for a full list. I would also like
