On Tuesday 26 April 2011 10:19:36 David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
cyrus.header.
4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:19:10 +0200
Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
In my experience, most IMAP-mail clients have problems inserting the
INBOX.sub folder. In these cases we'd probably need to do this manually
using cyradm.
I think at this point it comes down to what is most likely -
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 09:49:05 Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:19:10 +0200
Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Would a second flag, for instance --full-dir-tree (or similar), to
change the behaviour to create the directory regardless work?
It would, but we don't
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
cyrus.header.
4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one cyrus.* file
OR at least one message file in the directory before
creating the mailbox. (so an
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
cyrus.header.
4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one cyrus.* file
OR at least one message file in the directory
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, David Lang david.l...@digitalinsight.com
wrote:
I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
INBOX.sub.folder1
and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism
if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user didn't want it, could they
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, David Lang david.l...@digitalinsight.com
wrote:
I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
INBOX.sub.folder1
and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism
if you were to create INBOX.sub
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, David Lang david.l...@digitalinsight.com
wrote:
I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
INBOX.sub.folder1
and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism
if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user didn't
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:20:51 +0900, Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, David Lang david.l...@digitalinsight.com
wrote:
I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
INBOX.sub.folder1
and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:31:40AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:20:51 +0900, Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
10 matches
Mail list logo
