Re: SASL problems

2005-12-14 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
i, --On 14. Dezember 2005 13:26:00 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do apologize but I have a problem I cannot solve. I type: sasldblistusers2 and I see that user cyrus exists in sasl2.db, that has 644 permissions. When I try testsaslauthd -u cyrus -p cyrus I found in /var/log/messages the

Re: SASL problems

2005-12-14 Thread Cristian Livadaru
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:26:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do apologize but I have a problem I cannot solve. I type: sasldblistusers2 and I see that user cyrus exists in sasl2.db, that has 644 permissions. yes this means that you have the user in your sasldb, but the error below

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Rob McMahon wrote: it. It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? As long as you add a policy that Trash gets wiped

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.0 Released

2005-12-14 Thread Ken Murchison
Huaqing Zheng wrote: On 12/12/05, Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.0. This is an BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new features that have not been tested on a wide-scale basis, although earlier

Just need a push

2005-12-14 Thread John P. Speno
Hi, my name is John, and I'm a former unix sys admin but I gave it up to be a programmer (yay python!). Now I'm back in the sys admin game for a small family business that needs to scale its order management system better and I think cyrus and IMAP is just the thing, but I just wanted to

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Simon Matter
I know this is an old problem, but I'd like your thoughts. We need to apply quotas to our students for the obvious reasons, but face the old issue of having them hit their quotas and then being unable to move forward because deleting mail from the client (SquirrelMail) typically means moving

replication : Authentication failed. no mechanism available

2005-12-14 Thread Patrice
Hi, I try to install the the new version of cyrus-imap to use the replication. but I can't authenticate on my replica server: here is the error in the log: sync_client[26757]: couldn't authenticate to backend server: no mechanism available here is the result of the synctest: S: * OK

Re: replication : Authentication failed. no mechanism available

2005-12-14 Thread Patrick H Radtke
Have you tried specifying what mechanism you want to use with synctest with -m? Its been a long time since I set this up (I started testing in May) so hopefully I remember everything. -Patrick On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Patrice wrote: Hi, I try to install the the new version of cyrus-imap to

Re: replication : Authentication failed. no mechanism available

2005-12-14 Thread Ken Murchison
Patrice wrote: Hi, I try to install the the new version of cyrus-imap to use the replication. but I can't authenticate on my replica server: here is the error in the log: sync_client[26757]: couldn't authenticate to backend server: no mechanism available here is the result of the

Re: replication : Authentication failed. no mechanism available

2005-12-14 Thread Patrick H Radtke
Looking a bit more at this: Our sync server does advertise the correct mechanism synctest -m PLAIN -t alpenwurst2 S: * SASL GSSAPI S: * STARTTLS S: * OK alpenwurst2.cc.columbia.edu Cyrus sync server v2.3-alpha C: STARTTLS S: OK Begin TLS negotiation now verify error:num=19:self signed

Design for a largish Cyrus server

2005-12-14 Thread Gary Mills
Our current SMTP and IMAP server is a Sun V480 with 4 CPUs and 16 GB of memory. It's running Solaris 9. It has 300 GB of IMAP storage on two 12-disk hardware RAID arrays. This contains about 30,000 mailboxes. There are about 1200 simultaneous IMAP sessions at the busiest time of the day. It's

Re: Just need a push

2005-12-14 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Hi, --On 14. Dezember 2005 08:57:01 -0500 John P. Speno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, my name is John, and I'm a former unix sys admin but I gave it up to be a programmer (yay python!). Now I'm back in the sys admin game for a small family business that needs to scale its order management

Re: Design for a largish Cyrus server

2005-12-14 Thread Jure Pečar
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:22:37 -0600 Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to leave SMTP on the V480 and add a 2-node load-balancing cluster for IMAP. Each of the two servers would be a Sun V440 with 4 CPUs and 16 GB of memory. They would run Solaris 10. Sun's QFS would provide shared

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Joseph Brennan
--On Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14 + Rob McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? Might as

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Rob McMahon
Joseph Brennan wrote: It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? Might as well just double their quota. They could create a whole set

Forcing users to IMAPS?

2005-12-14 Thread Jeff Davis
I'm in the process of getting a new server up and running and would like to force users to IMAPS, even if their client may not be configured to use it. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to the best way to accomplish this? Or do I need to suck it up and reconfigure the 1000

Re: Design for a largish Cyrus server

2005-12-14 Thread Patrick Radtke
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Jure Pečar wrote:About iSCSI ... any expirience with it? I know throughput is good enough, but what about latencies? Are they comparable with local disks or fibrechannel?I attended a "iSCSI is great" seminar last week, where a similar question was raised.Their answer

Re: Just need a push

2005-12-14 Thread Michael Loftis
--On December 14, 2005 8:57:01 AM -0500 John P. Speno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, my name is John, and I'm a former unix sys admin but I gave it up to be a programmer (yay python!). Now I'm back in the sys admin game for a small family business that needs to scale its order management

Re: Just need a push

2005-12-14 Thread cyrus
On Dec 14, 2005, at 9:57 PM, John P. Speno wrote: Hi, my name is John, and I'm a former unix sys admin but I gave it up to be a programmer (yay python!). Now I'm back in the sys admin game for a small family business that needs to scale its order management system better and I think cyrus

Re: Forcing users to IMAPS?

2005-12-14 Thread Jorey Bump
Jeff Davis wrote: I'm in the process of getting a new server up and running and would like to force users to IMAPS, even if their client may not be configured to use it. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to the best way to accomplish this? Or do I need to suck it up and

Re: Plain text password between frontend and backend

2005-12-14 Thread Ramya Krishnan
Ken Murchison wrote: Because the frontends proxy as the user to the backend, the IMAP LOGIN command can not be used. The only plaintext SASL mechanism that can be used is PLAIN, but you can't use it unless protected by TLS. Looking at the CAPABILITY output above, it doesn't look like you've

global quotta

2005-12-14 Thread Uroš Gruber
Hi! Is it possible to add for domain or maybe group some users, to use shared quotta. For example: client is allowed to create as many mailboxes, but used space is limited. I need this because I would like to create more flexible storage. regards Uros Cyrus Home Page: