Re: [ovirt-devel] The importance of fixing failed build-artifacts jobs

2018-02-25 Thread Eyal Edri
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Martin Perina wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:41 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > >> I think there's a rush to add FC27 and S390 (unrelated?) to the build. If >> either fail, right now, I don't think we should be too concerned with them. >> In the very near future

Re: [ovirt-devel] The importance of fixing failed build-artifacts jobs

2018-02-23 Thread Martin Perina
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:41 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > I think there's a rush to add FC27 and S390 (unrelated?) to the build. If > either fail, right now, I don't think we should be too concerned with them. > In the very near future we should be, though. > Y. > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Da

Re: [ovirt-devel] The importance of fixing failed build-artifacts jobs

2018-02-22 Thread Yaniv Kaul
I think there's a rush to add FC27 and S390 (unrelated?) to the build. If either fail, right now, I don't think we should be too concerned with them. In the very near future we should be, though. Y. On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: > Hi All, > > We have been seeing a large amoun

The importance of fixing failed build-artifacts jobs

2018-02-22 Thread Dafna Ron
Hi All, We have been seeing a large amount of changes that are not deployed into tested lately because of failed build-artifacts jobs so we decided that perhaps we need to explain the importance of fixing a failed build-artifacts job. If a change failed a build-artifacts job, no matter what platf