Koji.fedoraproject.org currently stores every rpm ever shipped to users
since the Fedora 7 days, along with a lot of information about every
build it’s ever made, even if not distributed. We have continued to grow
the storage backing koji over time, but it is close to reaching a size
we can no
On 8/2/19 7:12 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> Alright, I now have quite a few checks for the RabbitMQ servers. Those
> checks also give out interesting metrics like queue sizes, connections,
> message throughput, etc.
> Do we have something in place to use and display those metrics?
> I'd like to
Alright, I now have quite a few checks for the RabbitMQ servers. Those
checks also give out interesting metrics like queue sizes, connections,
message throughput, etc.
Do we have something in place to use and display those metrics?
I'd like to look at what our common usage values and trends are
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 19:46, Justin W. Flory wrote:
>
> On 8/1/19 3:34 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The Fedora Infrastructure is planning to retire the infinote [0]
> > service. This service allows text collaboration using the Gobby
> > client[1] and was mainly used by the
>
> What should I do? Create a SELinux module to allow that connection? Do we
> have a policy regarding that sort of module creation?
>
I see that the Copr role has a policy module in Ansible (both source and
binary), copies the binary to the destination and loads it with "semodule
-i". Can I do
>
> I've made a few changes to Jeremy's proposal, because I wanted to make use
> of the configuration file that the NRPE plugin already deploys.
> Attached is my proposed change to the Ansible repo.
>
> If that works I'll add more checks later on.
>
>
OK I deployed that config but now SELinux is
On 7/31/19 12:02 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hey Infra SIG!
>
> I've previously sent this to infra-...@lists.fedoraproject.org but that
> list is private, so reposting here:
>
> Forwarded Message
>
> This bugzilla is assigned to the Fedora Infrastructure SIG.
>
> There has been
On 8/1/19 8:33 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to try to implement this, and possibly add app-specific
>> monitoring of queues afterwards.
>>
>
> I've made a few changes to Jeremy's proposal, because I wanted to make use
> of the configuration file that the NRPE plugin already deploys.
