Re: Transifex has become proprietary

g for alternatives then I will say we should consider Zanata. I think OpenStack also affected by transifex which became closed source. They started discussing[1] [2] this issue. Regards, Parag Nemade [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/2013-October/000223.html [2]

Re: Transifex has become proprietary

Hi all, On 07/11/2014 10:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000 Noriko Mizumoto wrote: ...snip... Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of translators have not subscribed inf

Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Dear sysadmin-cvs group, I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs group that they found script process-git-requests[1] is not working for them and believe only limb knows how to run it. I see this is not good. We should have then new way of using process-git-requests do

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Pierre-Yves, On 12/29/2014 05:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: Dear sysadmin-cvs group, I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs group that they found script process-git-requests[1] is not working for

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Kevin, On 12/29/2014 10:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:29:48 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: Dear sysadmin-cvs group, I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs group that they found

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Jason, On 12/30/2014 12:32 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "PN" == Parag Nemade writes: PN> I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs PN> group that they found script process-git-requests[1] is not working PN> for them and believe only limb

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

On 12/30/2014 02:45 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 08:46:54AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: On 12/29/2014 05:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: Dear sysadmin-cvs group, I have seen after discussing with few

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Jason, On 12/31/2014 01:24 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "PN" == Parag Nemade writes: PN> In simple words no human is required for processing this request. Absolutely, categorically untrue. There are cases when it's OK. Even outside of simple sanity checking, the

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Jason, On 01/02/2015 03:32 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "PN" == Parag Nemade writes: PN> Another question, anyone can reply, why only one person is given PN> this work? That isn't the case. For me, one problem is that generally when I check there aren'

Do Fedora apps follow some common UI design?

? Also, do all apps shows footer on main page which also give information about which version that app is using? e.g. møte app is not showing from which source version its built/deployed. Regards, Parag Nemade.

Re: Can't login to fedora project wiki page

Hi, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Nuwan Indika wrote: > Hi Kevin and all, > I will apply non CLA group but Kevin I created my fedoraproject wiki > account last year (I'm working with the Danishka Navin > and Truong Anh Tuan >

[PATCH] improve fedmsg rules for g11n

Hi, The pagure ticket update fedmsg notifications were not coming for i18n and g11n projects. I think attached patch will fix this. Please review this patch and if it looks good, merge it, not urgent maybe after freeze period gets completed. Regards, Parag Nemade. From

Re: Why is RedHat using Piwik to track contributors?

Hi, On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft < jean-bapti...@holcroft.fr> wrote: > Le 11/10/2016 à 18:12, Fabio Alessandro Locati a écrit : > >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:48:20AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft wrote: >> >>> English native doing that to evade the subject... >>> >>

Re: [PATCH] improve fedmsg rules for g11n

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, > The pagure ticket update fedmsg notifications were not coming for i18n > and g11n projects. I think attached patch will fix this. Please review this > patch and if it looks good, merge it, not urgent maybe after freeze p

Re: [PATCH] improve fedmsg rules for g11n

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:54:43 +0530 > Parag Nemade wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Parag Nemade > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > The pagure ticket update fedmsg notifications were n

Re: [PATCH] improve fedmsg rules for g11n

Hi, I have expected few amount of messages but actually they are very much. Here I am proposing to minimize the message flow to irc channel. Please review the attached patch and if it looks good then apply. Thank you, Parag. From 636dfb78e5223231f1f55a46fef59ec7a81abd9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Re: congrats to our new sysadmin-mainer

Congratulations Samyak!! On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 2:23 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm happy to announce that We have approved a new member in our > sysadmin-main group: > > jnsamyak - Samyak Jain > > This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most > everything in fedora infras