Re: Transifex has become proprietary

for alternatives then I will say we should consider Zanata. I think OpenStack also affected by transifex which became closed source. They started discussing[1] [2] this issue. Regards, Parag Nemade [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/2013-October/000223.html [2] http

Re: Transifex has become proprietary

Hi all, On 07/11/2014 10:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000 Noriko Mizumotonor...@fedoraproject.org wrote: ...snip... Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of

Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Dear sysadmin-cvs group, I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs group that they found script process-git-requests[1] is not working for them and believe only limb knows how to run it. I see this is not good. We should have then new way of using process-git-requests

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Pierre-Yves, On 12/29/2014 05:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: Dear sysadmin-cvs group, I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs group that they found script process-git-requests[1] is not working

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Kevin, On 12/29/2014 10:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:29:48 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibonpin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: Dear sysadmin-cvs group, I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Jason, On 12/30/2014 12:32 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: PN == Parag Nemadepnem...@redhat.com writes: PN I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs PN group that they found script process-git-requests[1] is not working PN for them and believe only limb knows how to

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

On 12/30/2014 02:45 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 08:46:54AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: On 12/29/2014 05:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: Dear sysadmin-cvs group, I have seen after discussing with few

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Jason, On 12/31/2014 01:24 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: PN == Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com writes: PN In simple words no human is required for processing this request. Absolutely, categorically untrue. There are cases when it's OK. Even outside of simple sanity checking

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

Hi Jason, On 01/02/2015 03:32 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: PN == Parag Nemadepnem...@redhat.com writes: PN Another question, anyone can reply, why only one person is given PN this work? That isn't the case. For me, one problem is that generally when I check there aren't any requests to

Do Fedora apps follow some common UI design?

? Also, do all apps shows footer on main page which also give information about which version that app is using? e.g. møte app is not showing from which source version its built/deployed. Regards, Parag Nemade.

Re: Can't login to fedora project wiki page

Hi, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Nuwan Indika wrote: > Hi Kevin and all, > I will apply non CLA group but Kevin I created my fedoraproject wiki > account last year (I'm working with the Danishka Navin > and Truong Anh Tuan >

[PATCH] improve fedmsg rules for g11n

Hi, The pagure ticket update fedmsg notifications were not coming for i18n and g11n projects. I think attached patch will fix this. Please review this patch and if it looks good, merge it, not urgent maybe after freeze period gets completed. Regards, Parag Nemade. From

Re: [PATCH] improve fedmsg rules for g11n

Hi, I have expected few amount of messages but actually they are very much. Here I am proposing to minimize the message flow to irc channel. Please review the attached patch and if it looks good then apply. Thank you, Parag. From 636dfb78e5223231f1f55a46fef59ec7a81abd9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Re: [PATCH] improve fedmsg rules for g11n

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Parag Nemade <pnem...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > The pagure ticket update fedmsg notifications were not coming for i18n > and g11n projects. I think attached patch will fix this. Please review this > patch and if it looks good, merge it, not

Re: [PATCH] improve fedmsg rules for g11n

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:54:43 +0530 > Parag Nemade <pnem...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Parag Nemade <pnem...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > >