Re: Has anyone built Inline for HP-UX 11.0?

2001-04-30 Thread Piers Harding
I have done this but I used the GCC on HP-UX - available from http://devresource.hp.com. I have had so much trouble with building other products such as Apache with mod_perl and openssl, and openldap, that I discarded the hp compiler ( you should see the comments about the hp compiler in the

Re: Has anyone built Inline for HP-UX 11.0?

2001-04-30 Thread Clint Olsen
Hi Brian: I built Perl with HP's performance C compiler since I've seen gcc on quite a few occasions produce considerably slower binaries for the HPPA. We already have enough performance problems with Perl as it is :) Our system administrator team built 5.005_03 with this compiler, so I know

Re: Has anyone built Inline for HP-UX 11.0?

2001-04-30 Thread Piers Harding
No - all my problems went away when I started using the GCC fro everything :-). The rarer problems I have now are with some non GCC compiled code, or code that isnt compiled position independent. Lots of pointers to problems like this on the HP compiler mailing lists. Cheers. On Mon, Apr

Re: Has anyone built Inline for HP-UX 11.0?

2001-04-30 Thread Piers Harding
OK - some more evidence - look on google for pointers towards problems with thread local storage and HP compilers ( TLS ) - these are also a source of pain for me ( in particular with linking in the oracle client libraries for instance ). Cheers. On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:18:45AM -0700,

Re: Has anyone built Inline for HP-UX 11.0?

2001-04-30 Thread Piers Harding
True - the optional extra ( at a price !) compiler is better than the KR, but I still had problems done the track with building mod_perl into Apache after having built perl cleanly with this. Cheers. On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:22:29AM -0700, Clint Olsen wrote: Hello: I want to distinguish