-Original Message-
From: Ed J via RT
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 11:12 AM
Forgive my ignorance, including of MakeMaker - would it be possible to
make a test for the generality of building a module, by installing it into
a temporary directory, probably under /tmp? This would probably
Mon Jun 23 11:06:50 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
Sun Jun 15 17:55:25 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Mon Jun 09 22:45:21 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
-Original Message-
From: Jason McCarver via RT
I think I'd like to look into that problem. May be over the weekend
before I have a chance though.
I think there's another hiccup, too.
Using the patched Inline-0.55, the demo module in modules/Math/Simple (in
Inline-0.55 source) then
Sun Jun 08 09:18:53 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
-Original Message-
From: Jason McCarver via RT
It looks like a line of the patch was applied to the wrong location in
Inline.pm.
Sorry 'bout that.
Fixing it takes care of the problem.
Hopefully we're getting close! :)
I think so.
One thing I have noticed is that, for the
Wed Jun 04 05:11:58 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
Thu Jun 05 00:00:57 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
-Original Message-
From: Jason McCarver via RT
http://cac.parasite.cc/~slam/Inline
Kept getting a gateway timeout error.
I'll install mercurial and check it out that way (when I get a chance).
For the Foo distro I'm currently using:
Tue Jun 03 04:36:36 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
Tue Jun 03 08:36:25 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
-Original Message-
From: Jason McCarver via RT
After digging a bit I found that ExtUtils::MakeMaker was already locating
all modules to be installed and placing that list in $mm-{PM} (where $mm
is the returned object from the call to
ExtUtils::MakeMaker::WriteMakefile).
I didn't
Mon Jun 02 21:18:33 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by trueability@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
Sat May 31 17:58:18 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
-Original Message-
From: Jason McCarver via RT
.. so then it's back to how does I::MM know which modules need to
be 'use'ed. My attempt at a
solution was to force the programmer to explicitly tell I::MM by way of
the INLINE_MODULES argument. I do agree it would be better to
Tue May 27 10:16:00 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Mon May 26 06:03:09 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
-Original Message-
From: Jason McCarver via RT
I noticed that in your Foo.tar.gz that you originally built each module
had its own Makefile.PL, like each was its own distribution. For what I'm
working on I have a single distribution containing multiple modules that
use Inline. I
-Original Message-
From: sisyph...@optusnet.com.au via RT
Turns out that while the structure I was using successfully builds and
installs, it doesn't actually install the compiled libraries - so it's
inadequate on that score. (This also should be fixed.)
My mistake. Nothing to be
Mon May 26 08:20:03 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
Mon May 26 08:26:50 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Mon May 26 09:56:36 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
-Original Message-
From: Jason McCarver via RT
I don't see the Foo-4.tar.gz attachement? Neither in my email or via the
web.
Don't worry - you're not going blind. (I'm just going mad ;-)
I've now attached it as Foo-fixed.tar.gz.
It's essentially the Foo distro that you sent, except
Mon May 26 20:17:10 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
-Original Message-
From: Jason McCarver via RT
So just out of curiosity (and this may not be the proper forum) why do you
prefer your layout?
That's the layout I've always used, and it has never given me any trouble.
(That's pretty much the full extent of my reasoning ;-)
I also
Mon May 26 20:35:23 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
Sun May 25 15:49:48 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Sat May 24 08:57:51 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
From: sisyph...@optusnet.com.au via RT
To achieve a better understanding of the issue, I created a distro
(attached) that matches the description provided.
In the absence of any further feedback, I then altered the Foo distro so
that:
Foo uses Inline
Foo loads Foo::Bar (which uses Inline)
Sat May 24 20:21:07 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by s...@parasite.cc
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Wed May 21 07:40:52 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution
with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value
32 matches
Mail list logo
