Yes, at least they all use git...
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Andras Lasso wrote:
> Yes, processes are different. But it helps if at least tools are the same.
>
>
>
> Andras
>
>
>
> From: Bill Lorensen
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 20:33
> To: Andras Lasso
> Cc: Matt McCormick; Insight-User
Andras,
Each of our systems, VTK, ITK and Slicer use a different process. I am
only comfortable with the one that I am currently using. If I change
from VTK to Slicer, I need to relearn. Even from VTK to ITK I have to
relearn a bit.
Until we all use the same process, we will have these issues. An
Here are comments I made 3 years ago on the VTK discussion about
changing VTK's code review process.
-
Berk,
I think we need to reach out to potential developers. Especially those
outside of Kitware(and their paying customers) and the long term VTK
developers outside Kitware. Those co
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:07:44 -0400, Matt McCormick said:
>We are considering migration of ITK's software process to GitHub, and
>we would like your feedback.
My 2 cents:
- I'd be happy to see a move away from gerrit.
- I'd prefer a move to a Kitware-hosted GitLab, like VTK did.
- GitHub is nic
I agree. I argued against gitlab but lost...
+1 for this move.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Matt McCormick
wrote:
> I have followed VTK's migration to GitLab, and Kitware has done an
> excellent job with it. That said, I still think GitHub is the better
> choice for ITK. Also, the technical
I have followed VTK's migration to GitLab, and Kitware has done an
excellent job with it. That said, I still think GitHub is the better
choice for ITK. Also, the technical and social situation has changed
in the time since VTK moved to GitLab.
I think the key factor is "community", and GitHub has
Vtk moved to gitlab. Have you checked with the Kitware folks to see why
they didn't use gitlab? For me, either github or gitlab is great.
On Jul 31, 2017 6:03 PM, "Johnson, Hans J" wrote:
> 1000 x +1
>
> I enthusiastically support this proposal.
>
> Hans
>
>
> On 7/31/17, 4:57 PM, "Insight-use
1000 x +1
I enthusiastically support this proposal.
Hans
On 7/31/17, 4:57 PM, "Insight-users on behalf of Jim Miller"
wrote:
+1
Jim
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Matt McCormick
wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> We are considering migration of ITK's software
+1
Jim
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Matt McCormick
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> We are considering migration of ITK's software process to GitHub, and
> we would like your feedback.
>
> As an open-source, community-driven project, mechanisms to communicate
> and interact with the community ar
Hi folks,
We are considering migration of ITK's software process to GitHub, and
we would like your feedback.
As an open-source, community-driven project, mechanisms to communicate
and interact with the community are a high priority for ITK.
Contributing should be as easy as possible. Increasingly
10 matches
Mail list logo
