Re: [Int-area] New draft: The IETF Will Continue Maintaining IPv4 (draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4)

2022-03-15 Thread Ted Lemon
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 2:59 PM Seth David Schoen wrote: > When we presented our reserved address space drafts at the previous IETF > meeting, we noticed that the most common concern was not so much about > the substance of our proposals as about the question of whether intarea > and the IETF

Re: [Int-area] New draft: The IETF Will Continue Maintaining IPv4 (draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4)

2022-03-15 Thread to...@strayalpha.com
> On Mar 15, 2022, at 1:04 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > FWIW I do not consider the minor wastage of IPv4 addresses that > the same authors are concerned about to be serious enough to need > fixing. +1 on that, especially. I.e., regardless of IPv6, this is working in too far in the

[Int-area] draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4

2022-03-15 Thread Jim Reid
> On 15 Mar 2022, at 20:04, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > IMHO the draft is unnecessary and potentially harmful. Well said! There is nothing to be gained from further consideration on this draft - or for the IETF to expend significant effort on the dregs of IPv4 space. There is

Re: [Int-area] New draft: The IETF Will Continue Maintaining IPv4 (draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4)

2022-03-15 Thread Behcet Sarikaya
+1 Behcet On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:32 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > +1 > > > El 15/3/22, 21:05, "Int-area en nombre de Brian E Carpenter" < > int-area-boun...@ietf.org en nombre de brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> > escribió: > > Hi, > > > Please let us know if you have any questions

Re: [Int-area] New draft: The IETF Will Continue Maintaining IPv4 (draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4)

2022-03-15 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
+1 El 15/3/22, 21:05, "Int-area en nombre de Brian E Carpenter" escribió: Hi, > Please let us know if you have any questions after reading the > draft. I have no questions. IMHO the draft is unnecessary and potentially harmful. It's a matter of common sense that

Re: [Int-area] New draft: The IETF Will Continue Maintaining IPv4 (draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4)

2022-03-15 Thread mrcullen42
> On Mar 15, 2022, at 4:05 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > […] > IMHO the draft is unnecessary and potentially harmful. +1 Margaret ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Re: [Int-area] New draft: The IETF Will Continue Maintaining IPv4 (draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4)

2022-03-15 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi, Please let us know if you have any questions after reading the draft. I have no questions. IMHO the draft is unnecessary and potentially harmful. It's a matter of common sense that the IETF will fix things that *need* fixing, even if they are specific to IPv4. It's a matter of fact that

[Int-area] New draft: The IETF Will Continue Maintaining IPv4 (draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4)

2022-03-15 Thread Seth David Schoen
Hi intarea, When we presented our reserved address space drafts at the previous IETF meeting, we noticed that the most common concern was not so much about the substance of our proposals as about the question of whether intarea and the IETF should be working on IPv4 fixes at all. This question