Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Luca Muscariello <
> luca.muscarie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> IMHO, there's no such a thing as a wrong question. But you can always ask
>> another one.
>> And BTW, I answered already to one of the questions you redo. Yes, ther
IMHO, there's no such a thing as a wrong question. But you can always ask
another one.
And BTW, I answered already to one of the questions you redo. Yes, there
will be another draft on transport.
It is not ready but I can have a technical report right before the IETF
week and I might give a
I answered to 3. Please dig into the reply for the full answer. In short it
is no, it does not.
And BTW, I am aware I'm not providing any analysis and that I'm not trying
to resolve any big thing
in an email thread discussion, I never said I was.
The objective is to answer to clarification
wait for that work to be available to the list first, probably next
week.
Luca
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:47 PM Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Luca Muscariello
> wrote:
> > There are several points raised here:
> > 1) Alleged protocol layering viol
e a lot more compelling if the transport
> and network layer are decoupled so there was one solution that
> provided seamless mobility for everyone in the network regardless of
> type of transport protocol they use or application that they wish to
> run. Beyond that, there might be
que while hICN is talking about anchoress mobility.
> Did I get something wrong?
>
> Behcet
>
>> Giovanna
>> ------
>> *From:* Int-area on behalf of Behcet
>> Sarikaya
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:18 PM
>> *To:* Luca Muscariello
>
switch to it.
There is no intent to replace TCP, UDP, LEDBAT, QUIC, SCTP or any other
transport protocol with the consumer/producer
sockets.
Luca
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:13 PM Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Luca Muscariello
> wrote:
> > More on the mobility us
* Int-area on behalf of Behcet Sarikaya
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:18 PM
> *To:* Luca Muscariello
> *Cc:* Internet Area; Luca Muscariello (lumuscar); Tom Herbert; dmm
> *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] [DMM] New draft posted: Anchorless mobility
> management through hICN (hICN-A
at 12:30 AM Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Luca Muscariello
> wrote:
> > The paragraph you reported is from the draft that describes hICN to
> enable
> > several use cases.
> > Mobility is one of those, not the only one.
> > To cl
Hi all,
the draft below has been posted and describes a network architecture
that implements icn semantics in IPv6 networks.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-muscariello-intarea-hicn/
the reason to implement icn semantics in IPv6, as opposed to on top of IP,
is that IPv6 addresses can be
10 matches
Mail list logo
