The adjective minor is used in a comparative way. At least I intended that
way.
hICN allows to implement ICN features with less changes than using ICN as
an overlay.
On an absolute scale, I don't think that hICN requires negligible changes.
So I haven't used the adjective minor as a synonym of
I am sorry but I'm not sure I get your question right.
I am not sure SRv6 is just a tunnelling technique but I am not right person
to talk about that.
We do mention SRv6 in the draft to show how hICN can use it to steer the
next-hop path for the request
carrying the ID in the DST addr field and
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Luca Muscariello
wrote:
> The adjective minor is used in a comparative way. At least I intended that
> way.
> hICN allows to implement ICN features with less changes than using ICN as an
> overlay.
> On an absolute scale, I don't think that hICN requires
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Luca Muscariello
wrote:
> More on the mobility use case which also makes deployment options easier to
> digest
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-auge-dmm-hicn-mobility/
>
>From the draft:
"The goal of hICN is to ease ICN insertion in existing IP
More on the mobility use case which also makes deployment options easier to
digest
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-auge-dmm-hicn-mobility/
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:33 PM Giovanna Carofiglio (gcarofig) <
gcaro...@cisco.com> wrote:
> This draft is about hICN and discusses various
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Giovanna Carofiglio (gcarofig) <
gcaro...@cisco.com> wrote:
> This draft is about hICN and discusses various deployment options with
> associated pros and cons, without supporting one specifically. Clearly,
> depending on application requirements, on network
