I would like some agenda to give an update on:
draft-ietf-intarea-gue-00
draft-herbert-gue-extensions-01
draft-herbert-nvo3-ila-03
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Wassim Haddad
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> The Intarea WG will meet in Seoul on Wednesday (11/16) afternoon for an
> hou
Fred, et al,
Thank you very much for sharing the link to "aerolink" draft.
We also submitted a draft t describing the background of "
draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels-00":
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-opsawg-private-networks-over-thin-cpe/
Looks like there are som
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Generic UDP Encapsulation
Authors : Tom Herbert
Lucy Yong
Rolf,
I read this draft (the -00 version) recently, since I'm co-author of
draft-ietf-anima-grasp, which relies heavily on link-local multicast. I did
find it useful, although I didn't in the end change anything as a result.
Should you mention the MSEC work and RFC 5374 in particular?
Regards
Hi Fred,
Thank you for the information.
Text: This document specifies the operation of IP over tunnel virtual links
using Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO).
One question, is AERO for IP in IP case, or XX in IP case?
We can discuss AERO protocol for this space in Seoul. Could you
Hi Lucy et al,
I would like to invite you to review the AERO proposal, which is also about
interconnecting multiple network sites as VPNs over IP backbone networks:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-aerolink/
I have not yet aligned this document with intarea, but will probably do so
Hello,
This draft describes use of a set of IP tunnels to interconnect multiple
network sites over IP backbone networks. We will present this in Seoul meeting
and look forward to hearing comments and suggestions on this work.
Thanks,
Authors
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@iet
Hello,
I've posted an update to the ILA draft.
I would like to request that this draft be taken up as a WG item in
inet-area. In Berlin we chatted with the int-area ADs and the
conclusion for ILA (this draft) seemed to be that it should be worked
in int-area WG. There will be a routing or control
Hi,
Apologies, but I screwed up the draft naming convention and just
uploaded the 00 and a 01 version with correct naming. The 00 version is
the one that was adopted by the WG, the 01 version now addresses the
comments made by Eliot and Stephane.
Sorry for the confusion.
Best,
Rolf
Am 10/
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Privacy considerations for IP broadcast and multicast
protocol designers
Authors : Rolf Winter
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Privacy considerations for IP broadcast and multicast
protocol designers
Authors : Rolf Winter
Hi,
me again... that of course should read: "during the adoption call".
Best,
Rolf
Am 10/31/16 um 10:10 AM schrieb Rolf Winter:
Hi,
we just posted version 02 of the broadcast/multicast considerations
draft. We believe we have now addressed the review comments that the
document has received d
Hi,
we just posted version 02 of the broadcast/multicast considerations
draft. We believe we have now addressed the review comments that the
document has received during last call. Could commentors please check?
Best,
Rolf
___
Int-area mailing lis
13 matches
Mail list logo