Re: [Int-area] New Version Notification for draft-bonica-intarea-lossless-pmtud-01.txt

2019-10-31 Thread Joe Touch
> On Oct 31, 2019, at 5:07 PM, Erik Kline wrote: > > It may be folly to try to modify IPv4 implementations at this point. I have > no objections if you wish to try pushing this big rock up hill, but I doubt > you will be successful. > > BTW, what *actually* prevents a middlebox from doing

Re: [Int-area] New Version Notification for draft-bonica-intarea-lossless-pmtud-01.txt

2019-10-31 Thread Erik Kline
> > It may be folly to try to modify IPv4 implementations at this point. I > have no objections if you wish to try pushing this big rock up hill, but I > doubt you will be successful. > BTW, what *actually* prevents a middlebox from doing IPv6 fragmentation? In other words, if some box "decided

[Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-intarea-lossless-pmtud-01.txt

2019-10-31 Thread Ron Bonica
Updated draft Juniper Business Use Only -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 3:15 PM To: Ron Bonica ; Hakan Alpan ; Radon Rosborough ; Bradely Newton ; Bradley Newton ; Miles President ; Manoj Nayak Subject: New Version Notification

Re: [Int-area] New Version Notification for draft-bonica-intarea-lossless-pmtud-00.txt

2019-10-31 Thread Ron Bonica
Joe, You have a point that this solution may never be widely deployed. So, I have cranked the intended status back to EXPERIMENTAL and removed the IANA request. (We can work with experimental code points.) We will do the experiment and report on results.