Hi, Eric,
> On Sep 23, 2019, at 1:40 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>
> Now, it would nice to have a volunteer to write a document to finally
> document those “Any bla” protocol number by putting common sense
> restrictions/constraints on them (protocols 9/IGP, 61/host internal, 63/local
>
network, 68/distributed FS, 99/private encryption scheme, 114/0-hop).
Regards
-éric
From: Int-area on behalf of Eric Vyncke
Date: Thursday, 19 September 2019 at 17:07
To: "int-area@ietf.org" , "i...@ietf.org"
Subject: [Int-area] Existing use of IP protocol 114 (any 0-hop pr
Erik,
IP Protocol numbers are a scarce resource and the allocation policy is
"IESG Approval or Standards Action". They aren't interested in the latter,
so they would need the former. So if they can legitimately reuse 114, it
makes everyone's life easier.
Cheers,
Andy
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at
Where do they want to use this, and why not request a new protocol value?
(What did i...@iana.org say?)
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 08:07, Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
wrote:
> The authors of https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhu-intarea-gma-03.txt
> would like to use IP protocol 114 as it is described as
On 19/9/19 18:06, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> The authors of https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhu-intarea-gma-03.txt
> would like to use IP protocol 114 as it is described as “Any 0-hop
> protocol” on the IANA page[1]. Alas, on the IANA page, there is no
> reference to this “Any 0-hop protocol”.
The authors of https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhu-intarea-gma-03.txt would
like to use IP protocol 114 as it is described as “Any 0-hop protocol” on the
IANA page[1]. Alas, on the IANA page, there is no reference to this “Any 0-hop
protocol”.
Obviously, we all understand that this must be a
