Re: [Int-area] IP Protocol number allocation request for Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol

2020-03-23 Thread Jon Maloy
On 3/20/20 11:04 AM, Joseph Touch wrote: On Mar 20, 2020, at 7:09 AM, Jon Maloy > wrote: Adding cc toint-a...@ietf.org, since I forgot that in my original response. On 3/19/20 9:18 PM, Joseph Touch wrote: On Mar 19, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Jon Maloy

Re: [Int-area] IP Protocol number allocation request for Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol

2020-03-23 Thread Tom Herbert
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 7:32 AM Jon Maloy wrote: > > > > On 3/20/20 11:04 AM, Joseph Touch wrote: > > > > On Mar 20, 2020, at 7:09 AM, Jon Maloy wrote: > > Adding cc to int-area@ietf.org, since I forgot that in my original response. > > > On 3/19/20 9:18 PM, Joseph Touch wrote: > > > > On Mar

Re: [Int-area] IP Protocol number allocation request for Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol

2020-03-23 Thread Joseph Touch
Jon, First, if you’re going to come to the IETF asking for something as core as an IP protocol number, you need to be able to explain your system to us in our terms. That means explaining things below in the following terms: UDP/TCP and nearly anything over IP = transport IP =

Re: [Int-area] IP Protocol number allocation request for Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol

2020-03-23 Thread Jon Maloy
On 3/23/20 11:38 AM, Tom Herbert wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 7:32 AM Jon Maloy wrote: On 3/20/20 11:04 AM, Joseph Touch wrote: On Mar 20, 2020, at 7:09 AM, Jon Maloy wrote: Adding cc to int-area@ietf.org, since I forgot that in my original response. On 3/19/20 9:18 PM, Joseph

Re: [Int-area] IP Protocol number allocation request for Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol

2020-03-23 Thread Joseph Touch
> On Mar 23, 2020, at 11:40 AM, Jon Maloy wrote: > >>> At the socket level we are using TIPC service addresses for this, i.e., a >>> {service type, service instance} tuple, each element being a 32-bit integer. >> >> That, IMO, is an ID that belongs *inside* UDP port TIPC. That is YOUR >>

[Int-area] FYI/Feedback for draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps-00

2020-03-23 Thread Toerless Eckert
Dear intarea WG We think draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps/ does in part touch aspects related to intarea, so we are interested in your opinion/feedback. We think its mostly architectual through, so maybe architecture-disc...@ietf.org is more appropriate for

Re: [Int-area] FYI/Feedback for draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps-00

2020-03-23 Thread Joseph Touch
Reads like an academic white paper. Worth about as much of my attention. Sorry, but you asked. Joe > On Mar 23, 2020, at 7:09 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote: > > Dear intarea WG > > We think draft > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps/ > does in part touch aspects