I am also wondering if hop-by-hop options been considered for this
application? Their interpretation in the network is unabiguous and
they also have the advantage that the work with any IP protocol or
encapsulation.
IPv6 hop-by-hop options has been considered. See
draft-brockners-inband-oam-transp
Hi Adrian,
Many thx for leading this side meeting with many thought provoking
sub-topics.
I just wanted to ask
- If this is part of a series of side meetings on
this broader topic? ( I remember a couple of IETFs back one side meeting on
this topic but couldn't find it in t
posted in this WG recently
>
> > https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/routing.addressing.manifesto
>
> > (btw, I signed up there)
>
>
>
> Not directly related, no. Although you are right to observe that Luigi’s
> draft (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iannone-r
Great discussion and inputs from many header compression experts.
>So maybe for the networks or applications where low latency is a critical
requirement in addition to the bandwidth efficiency, we could find such
context-less scheme more compelling.
I can with certainty give 2 such examples wher
